Articles | Volume 22, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3231-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3231-2022
Research article
 | 
07 Oct 2022
Research article |  | 07 Oct 2022

Pseudo-prospective testing of 5-year earthquake forecasts for California using inlabru

Kirsty Bayliss, Mark Naylor, Farnaz Kamranzad, and Ian Main

Related authors

Downstream rounding rate of pebbles in the Himalaya
Prakash Pokhrel, Mikael Attal, Hugh D. Sinclair, Simon M. Mudd, and Mark Naylor
Earth Surf. Dynam., 12, 515–536, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-515-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-515-2024, 2024
Short summary
Impact of change in erosion rate and landscape steepness on hillslope and fluvial sediments grain size in the Feather River basin (Sierra Nevada, California)
M. Attal, S. M. Mudd, M. D. Hurst, B. Weinman, K. Yoo, and M. Naylor
Earth Surf. Dynam., 3, 201–222, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-201-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-201-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Earthquake Hazards
A dense micro-electromechanical system (MEMS)-based seismic network in populated areas: rapid estimation of exposure maps in Trentino (NE Italy)
Davide Scafidi, Alfio Viganò, Jacopo Boaga, Valeria Cascone, Simone Barani, Daniele Spallarossa, Gabriele Ferretti, Mauro Carli, and Giancarlo De Marchi
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1249–1260, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1249-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1249-2024, 2024
Short summary
Exploring inferred geomorphological sediment thickness as a new site proxy to predict ground-shaking amplification at regional scale: application to Europe and eastern Türkiye
Karina Loviknes, Fabrice Cotton, and Graeme Weatherill
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1223–1247, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1223-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1223-2024, 2024
Short summary
Surface rupture kinematics of the 2020 Mw 6.6 Masbate (Philippines) earthquake determined from optical and radar data
Khelly Shan Sta. Rita, Sotiris Valkaniotis, and Alfredo Mahar Francisco Lagmay
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1135–1161, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1135-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1135-2024, 2024
Short summary
The influence of aftershocks on seismic hazard analysis: a case study from Xichang and the surrounding areas
Qing Wu, Guijuan Lai, Jian Wu, and Jinmeng Bi
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1017–1033, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1017-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1017-2024, 2024
Short summary
Characteristics and mechanisms of near-surface negative atmospheric electric field anomalies preceding the 5 September 2022, Ms 6.8 Luding earthquake in China
Lixin Wu, Xiao Wang, Yuan Qi, Jingchen Lu, and Wenfei Mao
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 773–789, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-773-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-773-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Adelfio, G. and Chiodi, M.: Including covariates in a space-time point process with application to seismicity, Stat. Method. Appl., 30, 947–971, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-020-00543-5, 2020. a
Bach, C. and Hainzl, S.: Improving empirical aftershock modeling based on additional source information, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 117, B04312, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008901, 2012. a
Bachl, F. E., Lindgren, F., Borchers, D. L., and Illian, J. B.: inlabru: an R package for Bayesian spatial modelling from ecological survey data, Meth. Ecol. Evol., 10, 760–766, https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13168, 2019. a
Bayliss, K., Naylor, M., Illian, J., and Main, I. G.: Data-Driven Optimization of Seismicity Models Using Diverse Data Sets: Generation, Evaluation, and Ranking Using Inlabru, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 125, e2020JB020226, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB020226, 2020. a, b, c, d, e
Bayliss, K., Naylor, M., Kamranzad, F., and Main, I.: Pseudo-prospective testing of 5-year earthquake forecasts for California using inlabru – data and code (v1.0.0), Zenodo [data set] and [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6534724, 2021. a
Download
Short summary
We develop probabilistic earthquake forecasts that include different spatial information (e.g. fault locations, strain rate) using a point process method. The performance of these models is tested over three different periods and compared with existing forecasts. We find that our models perform well, with those using simulated catalogues that make use of uncertainty in model parameters performing better, demonstrating potential to improve earthquake forecasting using Bayesian approaches.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint