Articles | Volume 22, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3231-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3231-2022
Research article
 | 
07 Oct 2022
Research article |  | 07 Oct 2022

Pseudo-prospective testing of 5-year earthquake forecasts for California using inlabru

Kirsty Bayliss, Mark Naylor, Farnaz Kamranzad, and Ian Main

Related authors

Impact of change in erosion rate and landscape steepness on hillslope and fluvial sediments grain size in the Feather River basin (Sierra Nevada, California)
M. Attal, S. M. Mudd, M. D. Hurst, B. Weinman, K. Yoo, and M. Naylor
Earth Surf. Dynam., 3, 201–222, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-201-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-201-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Earthquake Hazards
Tsunami scenario triggered by a submarine landslide offshore of northern Sumatra Island and its hazard assessment
Haekal A. Haridhi, Bor Shouh Huang, Kuo Liang Wen, Arif Mirza, Syamsul Rizal, Syahrul Purnawan, Ilham Fajri, Frauke Klingelhoefer, Char Shine Liu, Chao Shing Lee, Crispen R. Wilson, Tso-Ren Wu, Ichsan Setiawan, and Van Bang Phung
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 507–523, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-507-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-507-2023, 2023
Short summary
Scrutinizing and rooting the multiple anomalies of Nepal earthquake sequence in 2015 with the deviation–time–space criterion and homologous lithosphere–coversphere–atmosphere–ionosphere coupling physics
Lixin Wu, Yuan Qi, Wenfei Mao, Jingchen Lu, Yifan Ding, Boqi Peng, and Busheng Xie
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 231–249, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-231-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-231-2023, 2023
Short summary
On the calculation of smoothing kernels for seismic parameter spatial mapping: methodology and examples
David Montiel-López, Sergio Molina, Juan José Galiana-Merino, and Igor Gómez
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 91–106, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-91-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-91-2023, 2023
Short summary
Mass flows, turbidity currents and other hydrodynamic consequences of small and moderate earthquakes in the Sea of Marmara
Pierre Henry, M. Sinan Özeren, Nurettin Yakupoğlu, Ziyadin Çakir, Emmanuel de Saint-Léger, Olivier Desprez de Gésincourt, Anders Tengberg, Cristele Chevalier, Christos Papoutsellis, Nazmi Postacıoğlu, Uğur Dogan, Hayrullah Karabulut, Gülsen Uçarkuş, and M. Namık Çağatay
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3939–3956, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3939-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3939-2022, 2022
Short summary
Brief communication: The crucial assessment of possible significant vertical movements preceding the 28 December 1908, Mw = 7.1, Messina Straits earthquake
Nicola Alessandro Pino
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3787–3792, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3787-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3787-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Adelfio, G. and Chiodi, M.: Including covariates in a space-time point process with application to seismicity, Stat. Method. Appl., 30, 947–971, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-020-00543-5, 2020. a
Bach, C. and Hainzl, S.: Improving empirical aftershock modeling based on additional source information, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 117, B04312, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008901, 2012. a
Bachl, F. E., Lindgren, F., Borchers, D. L., and Illian, J. B.: inlabru: an R package for Bayesian spatial modelling from ecological survey data, Meth. Ecol. Evol., 10, 760–766, https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13168, 2019. a
Bayliss, K., Naylor, M., Illian, J., and Main, I. G.: Data-Driven Optimization of Seismicity Models Using Diverse Data Sets: Generation, Evaluation, and Ranking Using Inlabru, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 125, e2020JB020226, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB020226, 2020. a, b, c, d, e
Bayliss, K., Naylor, M., Kamranzad, F., and Main, I.: Pseudo-prospective testing of 5-year earthquake forecasts for California using inlabru – data and code (v1.0.0), Zenodo [data set] and [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6534724, 2021. a
Download
Short summary
We develop probabilistic earthquake forecasts that include different spatial information (e.g. fault locations, strain rate) using a point process method. The performance of these models is tested over three different periods and compared with existing forecasts. We find that our models perform well, with those using simulated catalogues that make use of uncertainty in model parameters performing better, demonstrating potential to improve earthquake forecasting using Bayesian approaches.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint