Articles | Volume 22, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-947-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-947-2022
Research article
 | 
22 Mar 2022
Research article |  | 22 Mar 2022

Ground motion prediction maps using seismic-microzonation data and machine learning

Federico Mori, Amerigo Mendicelli, Gaetano Falcone, Gianluca Acunzo, Rose Line Spacagna, Giuseppe Naso, and Massimiliano Moscatelli

Related authors

Characterizing uncertainty in shear wave velocity profiles from the Italian seismic microzonation database
Federico Mori, Giuseppe Naso, Amerigo Mendicelli, Giancarlo Ciotoli, Chiara Varone, and Massimiliano Moscatelli
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-104,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-104, 2024
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary

Related subject area

Earthquake Hazards
Modelling seismic ground motion and its uncertainty in different tectonic contexts: challenges and application to the 2020 European Seismic Hazard Model (ESHM20)
Graeme Weatherill, Sreeram Reddy Kotha, Laurentiu Danciu, Susana Vilanova, and Fabrice Cotton
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1795–1834, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1795-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1795-2024, 2024
Short summary
Scoring and ranking probabilistic seismic hazard models: an application based on macroseismic intensity data
Vera D'Amico, Francesco Visini, Andrea Rovida, Warner Marzocchi, and Carlo Meletti
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1401–1413, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1401-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1401-2024, 2024
Short summary
A dense micro-electromechanical system (MEMS)-based seismic network in populated areas: rapid estimation of exposure maps in Trentino (NE Italy)
Davide Scafidi, Alfio Viganò, Jacopo Boaga, Valeria Cascone, Simone Barani, Daniele Spallarossa, Gabriele Ferretti, Mauro Carli, and Giancarlo De Marchi
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1249–1260, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1249-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1249-2024, 2024
Short summary
Exploring inferred geomorphological sediment thickness as a new site proxy to predict ground-shaking amplification at regional scale: application to Europe and eastern Türkiye
Karina Loviknes, Fabrice Cotton, and Graeme Weatherill
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1223–1247, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1223-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1223-2024, 2024
Short summary
Surface rupture kinematics of the 2020 Mw 6.6 Masbate (Philippines) earthquake determined from optical and radar data
Khelly Shan Sta. Rita, Sotiris Valkaniotis, and Alfredo Mahar Francisco Lagmay
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1135–1161, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1135-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1135-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

ALOS: https://www.eorc.jaxa.jp/ALOS/en/dataset/aw3d30/aw3d30_e.htm, last access: May 2021. 
Beyer, K. and Bommer, J. J.: Relationships between Median Values and between Aleatory Variabilities for Different Definitions of the Horizontal Component of Motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, 1512–1522, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050210, 2006. 
Bindi, D., Pacor, F., Luzi, L., Puglia, R., Massa, M., Ameri, G., and Paolucci, R.: Ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian strong motion database, Bull. Earthq. Eng., 9, 1899–1920, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9313-z, 2011. 
Bindi, D., Massa, M., Luzi, L., Ameri, G., Pacor, F., Puglia, R., and Augliera, P.: Pan-European ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5 %-damped PSA at spectral periods up to 3.0 s using the RESORCE dataset, Bull. Earthq. Eng., 12, 391–430, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9525-5, 2014. 
Bouckovalas, G. D. and Papadimitriou, A. G.: Numerical evaluation of slope topography effects on seismic ground motion, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 25, 547–558, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.008, 2005. 
Download
Short summary
This work addresses the problem of the ground motion estimation over large areas as an important tool for seismic-risk reduction policies. In detail, the near-real-time estimation of ground motion is a key issue for emergency system management. Starting from this consideration, the present work proposes the application of a machine learning approach to produce ground motion maps, using nine input proxies. Such proxies consider seismological, geophysical, and morphological parameters.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint