Articles | Volume 24, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1459-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1459-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Evaluation of debris-flow building damage forecasts
Katherine R. Barnhart
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Geologic Hazards Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey,Box 25046 DFC MS 966, Denver, CO 80225-0046, USA
Christopher R. Miller
independent researcher: Denver, CO, USA
Francis K. Rengers
Geologic Hazards Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey,Box 25046 DFC MS 966, Denver, CO 80225-0046, USA
Jason W. Kean
Geologic Hazards Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey,Box 25046 DFC MS 966, Denver, CO 80225-0046, USA
Related authors
Alexander N. Gorr, Francis K. Rengers, Katherine R. Barnhart, Matthew A. Thomas, and Jason W. Kean
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6572, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6572, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Short summary
Postfire debris flows are fast-moving landslides that pose a significant risk to downstream communities around the world. Accurately predicting how large postfire debris flows will be, before they occur, allows us to better understand the potential effects of future events. In this study, we develop a new method for predicting postfire debris-flow volume in the western United States. Results show that this new method outperforms existing volume models and can improve postfire hazard assessments.
Nicole M. Gasparini, Adam M. Forte, and Katherine R. Barnhart
Earth Surf. Dynam., 12, 1227–1242, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-1227-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-1227-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The time it takes for a landscape to adjust to new environmental conditions is critical for understanding the impacts of past and future environmental changes. We used different computational models and methods and found that predicted times for a landscape to reach a stable condition vary greatly. Our results illustrate that reporting how timescales are measured is important. Modelers should ensure that the measurement technique addresses the question.
Alexander B. Prescott, Luke A. McGuire, Kwang-Sung Jun, Katherine R. Barnhart, and Nina S. Oakley
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2359–2374, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2359-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2359-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Fire can dramatically increase the risk of debris flows to downstream communities with little warning, but hazard assessments have not traditionally included estimates of inundation. We unify models developed by the scientific community to create probabilistic estimates of inundation area in response to rainfall at forecast lead times (≥ 24 h) needed for decision-making. This work takes an initial step toward a near-real-time postfire debris-flow inundation hazard assessment product.
Francis K. Rengers, Samuel Bower, Andrew Knapp, Jason W. Kean, Danielle W. vonLembke, Matthew A. Thomas, Jaime Kostelnik, Katherine R. Barnhart, Matthew Bethel, Joseph E. Gartner, Madeline Hille, Dennis M. Staley, Justin K. Anderson, Elizabeth K. Roberts, Stephen B. DeLong, Belize Lane, Paxton Ridgway, and Brendan P. Murphy
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2093–2114, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2093-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2093-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Every year the U.S. Geological Survey produces 50–100 postfire debris-flow hazard assessments using models for debris-flow likelihood and volume. To refine these models they must be tested with datasets that clearly document rainfall, debris-flow response, and debris-flow volume. These datasets are difficult to obtain, but this study developed and analyzed a postfire dataset with more than 100 postfire storm responses over a 2-year period. We also proposed ways to improve these models.
Luke A. McGuire, Scott W. McCoy, Odin Marc, William Struble, and Katherine R. Barnhart
Earth Surf. Dynam., 11, 1117–1143, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-11-1117-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-11-1117-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Debris flows are mixtures of mud and rocks that can travel at high speeds across steep landscapes. Here, we propose a new model to describe how landscapes are shaped by debris flow erosion over long timescales. Model results demonstrate that the shapes of channel profiles are sensitive to uplift rate, meaning that it may be possible to use topographic data from steep channel networks to infer how erosion rates vary across a landscape.
Francis K. Rengers, Luke A. McGuire, Katherine R. Barnhart, Ann M. Youberg, Daniel Cadol, Alexander N. Gorr, Olivia J. Hoch, Rebecca Beers, and Jason W. Kean
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2075–2088, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2075-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2075-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Debris flows often occur after wildfires. These debris flows move water, sediment, and wood. The wood can get stuck in channels, creating a dam that holds boulders, cobbles, sand, and muddy material. We investigated how the channel width and wood length influenced how much sediment is stored. We also used a series of equations to back calculate the debris flow speed using the breaking threshold of wood. These data will help improve models and provide insight into future field investigations.
Gregory E. Tucker, Eric W. H. Hutton, Mark D. Piper, Benjamin Campforts, Tian Gan, Katherine R. Barnhart, Albert J. Kettner, Irina Overeem, Scott D. Peckham, Lynn McCready, and Jaia Syvitski
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 1413–1439, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1413-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1413-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Scientists use computer simulation models to understand how Earth surface processes work, including floods, landslides, soil erosion, river channel migration, ocean sedimentation, and coastal change. Research benefits when the software for simulation modeling is open, shared, and coordinated. The Community Surface Dynamics Modeling System (CSDMS) is a US-based facility that supports research by providing community support, computing tools and guidelines, and educational resources.
Alexander N. Gorr, Francis K. Rengers, Katherine R. Barnhart, Matthew A. Thomas, and Jason W. Kean
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6572, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6572, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Short summary
Postfire debris flows are fast-moving landslides that pose a significant risk to downstream communities around the world. Accurately predicting how large postfire debris flows will be, before they occur, allows us to better understand the potential effects of future events. In this study, we develop a new method for predicting postfire debris-flow volume in the western United States. Results show that this new method outperforms existing volume models and can improve postfire hazard assessments.
Nicole M. Gasparini, Adam M. Forte, and Katherine R. Barnhart
Earth Surf. Dynam., 12, 1227–1242, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-1227-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-1227-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The time it takes for a landscape to adjust to new environmental conditions is critical for understanding the impacts of past and future environmental changes. We used different computational models and methods and found that predicted times for a landscape to reach a stable condition vary greatly. Our results illustrate that reporting how timescales are measured is important. Modelers should ensure that the measurement technique addresses the question.
Alexander B. Prescott, Luke A. McGuire, Kwang-Sung Jun, Katherine R. Barnhart, and Nina S. Oakley
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2359–2374, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2359-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2359-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Fire can dramatically increase the risk of debris flows to downstream communities with little warning, but hazard assessments have not traditionally included estimates of inundation. We unify models developed by the scientific community to create probabilistic estimates of inundation area in response to rainfall at forecast lead times (≥ 24 h) needed for decision-making. This work takes an initial step toward a near-real-time postfire debris-flow inundation hazard assessment product.
Francis K. Rengers, Samuel Bower, Andrew Knapp, Jason W. Kean, Danielle W. vonLembke, Matthew A. Thomas, Jaime Kostelnik, Katherine R. Barnhart, Matthew Bethel, Joseph E. Gartner, Madeline Hille, Dennis M. Staley, Justin K. Anderson, Elizabeth K. Roberts, Stephen B. DeLong, Belize Lane, Paxton Ridgway, and Brendan P. Murphy
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2093–2114, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2093-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2093-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Every year the U.S. Geological Survey produces 50–100 postfire debris-flow hazard assessments using models for debris-flow likelihood and volume. To refine these models they must be tested with datasets that clearly document rainfall, debris-flow response, and debris-flow volume. These datasets are difficult to obtain, but this study developed and analyzed a postfire dataset with more than 100 postfire storm responses over a 2-year period. We also proposed ways to improve these models.
Luke A. McGuire, Francis K. Rengers, Ann M. Youberg, Alexander N. Gorr, Olivia J. Hoch, Rebecca Beers, and Ryan Porter
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1357–1379, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1357-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1357-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Runoff and erosion increase after fire, leading to a greater likelihood of floods and debris flows. We monitored debris flow activity following a fire in western New Mexico, USA, and observed 16 debris flows over a <2-year monitoring period. Rainstorms with recurrence intervals of approximately 1 year were sufficient to initiate debris flows. All debris flows initiated during the first several months following the fire, indicating a rapid decrease in debris flow susceptibility over time.
Luke A. McGuire, Scott W. McCoy, Odin Marc, William Struble, and Katherine R. Barnhart
Earth Surf. Dynam., 11, 1117–1143, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-11-1117-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-11-1117-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Debris flows are mixtures of mud and rocks that can travel at high speeds across steep landscapes. Here, we propose a new model to describe how landscapes are shaped by debris flow erosion over long timescales. Model results demonstrate that the shapes of channel profiles are sensitive to uplift rate, meaning that it may be possible to use topographic data from steep channel networks to infer how erosion rates vary across a landscape.
Francis K. Rengers, Luke A. McGuire, Katherine R. Barnhart, Ann M. Youberg, Daniel Cadol, Alexander N. Gorr, Olivia J. Hoch, Rebecca Beers, and Jason W. Kean
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2075–2088, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2075-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2075-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Debris flows often occur after wildfires. These debris flows move water, sediment, and wood. The wood can get stuck in channels, creating a dam that holds boulders, cobbles, sand, and muddy material. We investigated how the channel width and wood length influenced how much sediment is stored. We also used a series of equations to back calculate the debris flow speed using the breaking threshold of wood. These data will help improve models and provide insight into future field investigations.
Gregory E. Tucker, Eric W. H. Hutton, Mark D. Piper, Benjamin Campforts, Tian Gan, Katherine R. Barnhart, Albert J. Kettner, Irina Overeem, Scott D. Peckham, Lynn McCready, and Jaia Syvitski
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 1413–1439, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1413-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1413-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Scientists use computer simulation models to understand how Earth surface processes work, including floods, landslides, soil erosion, river channel migration, ocean sedimentation, and coastal change. Research benefits when the software for simulation modeling is open, shared, and coordinated. The Community Surface Dynamics Modeling System (CSDMS) is a US-based facility that supports research by providing community support, computing tools and guidelines, and educational resources.
Cited articles
Alessio, P., Dunne, T., and Morell, K.: Post-wildfire generation of debris-flow slurry by rill erosion on colluvial hillslopes, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 126, e2021JF006108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JF006108, 2021.
Baker, J., Bradley, B., and Stafford, P.: Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 582 pp., https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108425056, 2021.
Barnhart, K. R.: Select model results and model input parameters for debris-flow runout model simulations of the 9 January 2018 Montecito debris flow runout event, U.S. Geol. Surv. data release [data set], https://doi.org/10.5066/P9X18F2H, 2023.
Barnhart, K. R., Jones, R. P., George, D. L., McArdell, B. W., Rengers, F. K., Staley, D. M., and Kean, J. W.: Multi-model comparison of computed debris flow runout for the 9 January 2018 Montecito, California post-wildfire Event, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 126, e2021JF006245, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JF006245, 2021.
Barnhart, K. R., Romero, V. Y., and Clifford, K. C.: User needs assessment for post-fire debris flow inundation hazard products, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rep. 2023–1025, 25 pp., U.S. Geological Survey, https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20231025, 2023.
Calvo, B. and Savi, F.: A real-world application of Monte Carlo procedure for debris flow risk assessment, Model. Simul. Danger. Phenom. Hazard Mapp., 35, 967–977, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.04.002, 2009.
Cannon, S. H.: Debris-flow generation from recently burned watersheds, Environ. Eng. Geosci., 7, 321–341, https://doi.org/10.2113/gseegeosci.7.4.321, 2001.
Christen, M., Kowalski, J., and Bartelt, P.: RAMMS: Numerical simulation of dense snow avalanches in three-dimensional terrain, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 63, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.04.005, 2010.
FEMA – Federal Emergency Management Agency: Preliminary Damage Assessment Guide, 127 pp., https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_2021-pda-guide.pdf (last access: 22 April 2024), 2021.
FEMA – Federal Emergency Management Agency: Hazus® 5.1 Tsunami Model Technical Manual, 165 pp., https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_hazus-tsunami-model-technical-manual-5-1.pdf (last access: 22 April 2024), 2022a.
FEMA – Federal Emergency Management Agency: Hazus® 5.1 Earthquake Model Technical Manual, 467 pp., https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_hazus-earthquake-model-technical-manual-5-1.pdf (last access: 22 April 2024), 2022b.
Fuchs, S., Heiss, K., and Hübl, J.: Towards an empirical vulnerability function for use in debris flow risk assessment, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 7, 495–506, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-7-495-2007, 2007.
Furbish, D. J.: Fluid Physics in Geology, Oxford University Press, ISBN 9780195077018, https://global.oup.com/academic/product/fluid-physics-in-geology-9780195077018?cc=us&lang=en&# (last access: 22 April 2024), 1997.
Furbish, D. J.: Using the dynamically coupled behavior of land-surface geometry and soil thickness in developing and testing hillslope evolution models, in: Prediction in Geomorphology, Geophysical Monograph Series 135, edited by: Wilcock, P. R. and Iverson, R. M., American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 169–181, https://doi.org/10.1029/135GM12 2003.
Gartner, J. E., Cannon, S. H., and Santi, P. M.: Empirical models for predicting volumes of sediment deposited by debris flows and sediment-laden floods in the transverse ranges of southern California, Eng. Geol., 176, 45–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.04.008, 2014.
George, D. L. and Iverson, R. M.: A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy. II. Numerical predictions and experimental tests, P. Roy. Soc. A, 470, 20130820, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2013.0820, 2014.
Iverson, R. M.: The physics of debris flows, Rev. Geophys., 35, 245–296, https://doi.org/10.1029/97RG00426, 1997.
Iverson, R. M.: How should mathematical models of geomorphic processes be judged?, in: Prediction in Geomorphology, Geophysical Monograph Series 135, edited by: Wilcock, P. R. and Iverson, R. M., American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 83–94, https://doi.org/10.1029/135GM07, 2003.
Iverson, R. M. and George, D. L.: A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy. I. Physical basis, P. Roy. Soc. A, 470, 20130819, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2013.0819, 2014.
Iverson, R. M. and George, D. L.: Modelling landslide liquefaction, mobility bifurcation and the dynamics of the 2014 Oso disaster, Géotechnique, 66, 175–187, https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.LM.004, 2016.
Iverson, R. M., Schilling, S. P., and Vallance, J. W.: Objective delineation of lahar-inundation hazard zones, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 110, 972–984, https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1998)110<0972:ODOLIH>2.3.CO;2, 1998.
Iverson, R. M., George, D. L., and Logan, M.: Debris flow runup on vertical barriers and adverse slopes, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 121, 2333–2357, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JF003933, 2016.
Jakob, M., Stein, D., and Ulmi, M.: Vulnerability of buildings to debris flow impact, Nat. Hazards, 60, 241–261, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-0007-2, 2012.
Jones, R. P., Rengers, F. K., Barnhart, K. R., George, D. L., Staley, D. M., and Kean, J. W.: Simulating debris flow and levee formation in the 2D shallow flow model D-Claw: Channelized and unconfined flow, Earth Space Sci., 10, e2022EA002590, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002590, 2023.
Kean, J. W., Staley, D. M., Lancaster, J. T., Rengers, F. K., Swanson, B. J., Coe, J. A., Hernandez, J. L., Sigman, A. J., Allstadt, K. E., and Lindsay, D. N.: Debris-flow inundation and damage data from the 9 January 2018 Montecito debris-flow event, U.S. Geol. Surv. data release [data set], https://doi.org/10.5066/P9JQJU0E, 2019a.
Kean, J. W., Staley, D. M., Lancaster, J. T., Rengers, F. K., Swanson, B. J., Coe, J. A., Hernandez, J. L., Sigman, A. J., Allstadt, K. E., and Lindsay, D. N.: Inundation, flow dynamics, and damage in the 9 January 2018 Montecito debris-flow event, California, USA: Opportunities and challenges for post-wildfire risk assessment, Geosphere, 15, 1140–1163, https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02048.1, 2019b.
Lancaster, J. T., Swanson, B. J., Lukashov, S. G., Oakley, N. S., Lee, J. B., Spangler, E. R., Hernandez, J. L., Olson, B. P. E., DeFrisco, M. J., Lindsay, D. N., Schwartz, Y. J., McCrea, S. E., Roffers, P. D., and Tran, C. M.: Observations and analyses of the 9 January 2018 debris-flow disaster, Santa Barbara County, California, Environ. Eng. Geosci., 27, 3–27, https://doi.org/10.2113/EEG-D-20-00015, 2021.
Lukashov, S. G., Lancaster, J. T., Oakley, N. S., and Swanson, B. J.: Post-fire debris flows of 9 January 2018, Thomas Fire, southern California: Initiation areas, precipitation and impacts, 7th International Conference on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation, Colorado School of Mines Repository, 8 pp., https://doi.org/10.25676/11124/173144, 2019.
Luo, H. Y., Zhang, L. M., He, J., and Yin, K. S.: Reliability-based formulation of building vulnerability to debris flow impacts, Can. Geotech. J., 59, 40–54, https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2020-0120, 2022.
Luo, H. Y., Zhang, L. M., Zhang, L. L., He, J., and Yin, K. S.: Vulnerability of buildings to landslides: The state of the art and future needs, Earth-Sci. Rev., 238, 104329, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104329, 2023.
Morell, K. D., Alessio, P., Dunne, T., and Keller, E.: Sediment recruitment and redistribution in mountain channel networks by post-wildfire debris flows, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL095549, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095549, 2021.
Oakley, N. S., Cannon, F., Munroe, R., Lancaster, J. T., Gomberg, D., and Ralph, F. M.: Brief communication: Meteorological and climatological conditions associated with the 9 January 2018 post-fire debris flows in Montecito and Carpinteria, California, USA, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3037–3043, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-3037-2018, 2018.
Oakley, N. S., Liu, T., McGuire, L. A., Simpson, M., Hatchett, B. J., Tardy, A., Kean, J. W., Castellano, C., Laber, J. L., and Steinhoff, D.: Toward probabilistic post-fire debris-flow hazard decision support, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 104, E1587–E1605, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0188.1, 2023.
O'Brien, J. S.: FLO-2D reference manual, Tech. Rep., FLO-2D, https://documentation.flo-2d.com/ (last access: 1 June 2020), 2020.
O'Brien, J. S., Julien, P. Y., and Fullerton, W. T.: Two-dimensional water flood and mudflow simulation, J. Hydraul. Eng., 119, 244–261, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:2(244), 1993.
OpenStreetMap contributors: Planet dump, https://planet.osm.org (last access: 12 November 2021), 2021.
Quan Luna, B., Blahut, J., Van Westen, C. J., Sterlacchini, S., Van Asch, T. W. J., and Akbas, S. O.: The application of numerical debris flow modelling for the generation of physical vulnerability curves, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 2047–2060, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-2047-2011, 2011.
R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, v4.1.1, https://www.R-project.org (last access: 10 August 2021), 2021.
Roebber, P. J.: Visualizing multiple measures of forecast quality, Weather Forecast., 24, 601–608, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008WAF2222159.1, 2009.
Tan, W. Y.: Shallow water hydrodynamics: Mathematical theory and numerical solution for a two-dimensional system of shallow-water equations, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 433 pp., ISBN 9780080870939, 1992.
Totschnig, R., Sedlacek, W., and Fuchs, S.: A quantitative vulnerability function for fluvial sediment transport, Nat. Hazards, 58, 681–703, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9623-5, 2011.
Tucker, G. E.: Natural experiments in landscape evolution, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 34, 1450–1460, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1833, 2009.
U.S. Geological Survey: Lidar point cloud – USGS national map 3DEP downloadable data collection, U.S. Geological Survey, https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/4f70ab64e4b058caae3f8def (last access: 22 April 2024), 2017.
U.S. Geological Survey: Emergency assessment of post-fire debris-flow hazards, 2017 Thomas Fire, https://landslides.usgs.gov/static/landslides-realtime/fires/20171204_thomas/PostFireDebrisFlowEstimates.zip (last access: 22 April 2024), 2018.
U.S. Geological Survey: National Hydrography Dataset Flowline – Large Scale, https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/nhd/MapServer/6 (last access: 27 December 2022), 2022.
Vreugdenhil, C. B.: Numerical methods for shallow-water flow, in: Volume 13 of the Water Science and Technology Library, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 262 pp., ISBN 978-0-7923-3164-3, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8354-1, 1994.
Weisberg, M.: Simulation and Similarity: Using Models to Understand the World, Oxford University Press, New York, 224 pp., https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199933662.001.0001, 2013.
Wilcock, P. R. and Iverson, R. M.: Prediction in Geomorphology, in: Geophysical Monograph Series, edited by: Wilcock, P. R. and Iverson, R. M., American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 3–11, https://doi.org/10.1029/135GM01, 2003.
Wilks, D. S.: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, in: 4th Edn., Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 818 pp., https://doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-03921-6, 2019.
Zhang, S., Zhang, L., Li, X., and Xu, Q.: Physical vulnerability models for assessing building damage by debris flows, Eng. Geol., 247, 145–158, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.10.017, 2018.
Short summary
Debris flows are a type of fast-moving landslide that start from shallow landslides or during intense rain. Infrastructure located downstream of watersheds susceptible to debris flows may be damaged should a debris flow reach them. We present and evaluate an approach to forecast building damage caused by debris flows. We test three alternative models for simulating the motion of debris flows and find that only one can forecast the correct number and spatial pattern of damaged buildings.
Debris flows are a type of fast-moving landslide that start from shallow landslides or during...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint