Articles | Volume 14, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-3077-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-3077-2014
Research article
 | 
27 Nov 2014
Research article |  | 27 Nov 2014

Evaluation of forest fire models on a large observation database

J. B. Filippi, V. Mallet, and B. Nader

Related authors

Evaluation of wildland fire smoke plume dynamics and aerosol load using UV scanning lidar and fire–atmosphere modelling during the Mediterranean Letia 2010 experiment
V. Leroy-Cancellieri, P. Augustin, J. B. Filippi, C. Mari, M. Fourmentin, F. Bosseur, F. Morandini, and H. Delbarre
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 509–523, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-509-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-509-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Other Hazards (e.g., Glacial and Snow Hazards, Karst, Wildfires Hazards, and Medical Geo-Hazards)
How hard do avalanche practitioners tap during snow stability tests?
Håvard B. Toft, Samuel V. Verplanck, and Markus Landrø
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2757–2772, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2757-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2757-2024, 2024
Short summary
A large-scale validation of snowpack simulations in support of avalanche forecasting focusing on critical layers
Florian Herla, Pascal Haegeli, Simon Horton, and Patrick Mair
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2727–2756, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2727-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2727-2024, 2024
Short summary
A glacial lake outburst flood risk assessment for the Phochhu river basin, Bhutan
Tandin Wangchuk and Ryota Tsubaki
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2523–2540, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2523-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2523-2024, 2024
Short summary
AutoATES v2.0: Automated Avalanche Terrain Exposure Scale mapping
Håvard B. Toft, John Sykes, Andrew Schauer, Jordy Hendrikx, and Audun Hetland
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1779–1793, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1779-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1779-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modelling the vulnerability of urban settings to wildland–urban interface fires in Chile
Paula Aguirre, Jorge León, Constanza González-Mathiesen, Randy Román, Manuela Penas, and Alonso Ogueda
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1521–1537, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1521-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1521-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Alexander, M. E. and Cruz, M. G.: Are the applications of wildland fire behaviour models getting ahead of their evaluation again?, Environ. Modell. Softw., 41, 65–71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.11.001, 2013.
Anderson, H.: Heat transfer and fire spread, USDA Forest Service research paper INT, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, US Dept. of Agriculture, 1969.
Anderson, H., Forest, I., and Range Experiment Station (Ogden, U.: Aids to determining fuel models for estimating fire behavior, General technical report INT, US Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1981.
Andrews, P. L.: BEHAVE: fire behavior prediction and fuel modeling system – BURN subsystem, Tech. rep., USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, 1986.
Andrews, P. L., Cruz, M. L., and Rothermel, R.: Examination of the wind speed limit function in the Rothermel surface fire spread model, Int. J. Wildland Fire, 22, 959–969, https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.1071/WF12122, 2013.
Download
Short summary
A set of 80 Mediterranean fire cases is used as an observation database for model evaluation. Simulations are carried out with 4 different front velocity models. The results are compared with several error scoring methods. All simulations are performed as automatic first guesses with no tuning, as an operational use. Regardless of the quality of the input data, it is found that the models can be ranked based on their performance and that the most complex models outperform the more empirical one.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint