Articles | Volume 15, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-769-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-769-2015
Research article
 | 
09 Apr 2015
Research article |  | 09 Apr 2015

Comparison of storm damage functions and their performance

B. F. Prahl, D. Rybski, O. Burghoff, and J. P. Kropp

Related authors

Damage functions for climate-related hazards: unification and uncertainty analysis
Boris F. Prahl, Diego Rybski, Markus Boettle, and Jürgen P. Kropp
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1189–1203, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1189-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1189-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric, Meteorological and Climatological Hazards
On the potential of using smartphone sensors for wildfire hazard estimation through citizen science
Hofit Shachaf, Colin Price, Dorita Rostkier-Edelstein, and Cliff Mass
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3035–3047, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3035-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3035-2024, 2024
Short summary
Global estimates of 100-year return values of daily precipitation from ensemble weather prediction data
Florian Ruff and Stephan Pfahl
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2939–2952, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2939-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2939-2024, 2024
Short summary
Exploring the sensitivity of extreme event attribution of two recent extreme weather events in Sweden using long-running meteorological observations
Erik Holmgren and Erik Kjellström
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2875–2893, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2875-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2875-2024, 2024
Short summary
Probabilistic short-range forecasts of high-precipitation events: optimal decision thresholds and predictability limits
François Bouttier and Hugo Marchal
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2793–2816, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2793-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2793-2024, 2024
Short summary
Surprise floods: the role of our imagination in preparing for disasters
Joy Ommer, Jessica Neumann, Milan Kalas, Sophie Blackburn, and Hannah L. Cloke
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2633–2646, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2633-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2633-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Bernaola-Galván, P., Oliver, J., Hackenberg, M., Coronado, A., Ivanov, P., and Carpena, P.: Segmentation of time series with long-range fractal correlations, Eur. Phys. J. B, 85, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2012-20969-5, 2012.
Bouwer, L. M. and Wouter Botzen, W. J.: How sensitive are US hurricane damages to climate? Comment on a paper by W. D. Nordhaus, Clim. Change Econ., 02, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007811000188, 2011.
Box, G. E. and Cox, D. R.: An analysis of transformations, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B, 26, 211–252, 1964.
Cusack, S.: A 101 year record of windstorms in the Netherlands, Climatic Change, 116, 693–704, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0527-0, 2013.
Download
Short summary
Winter storms are the most costly natural hazard for European residential property. Their costs can be assessed via damage functions relating storm intensity to loss. However, the heavy-tailed loss distribution and the high uncertainty pose difficulties for their application. We address these difficulties by comparing four empirical damage functions and providing model recommendations. In a broader context, we discuss the shape of the damage functions in the light of theoretical considerations.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint