Articles | Volume 15, issue 4
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 769–788, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-769-2015
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 769–788, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-769-2015

Research article 09 Apr 2015

Research article | 09 Apr 2015

Comparison of storm damage functions and their performance

B. F. Prahl et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 2,960 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,485 1,380 95 2,960 361 96 84
  • HTML: 1,485
  • PDF: 1,380
  • XML: 95
  • Total: 2,960
  • Supplement: 361
  • BibTeX: 96
  • EndNote: 84
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Sep 2014)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Sep 2014)

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Saved (final revised paper)

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 21 Jan 2022
Download
Short summary
Winter storms are the most costly natural hazard for European residential property. Their costs can be assessed via damage functions relating storm intensity to loss. However, the heavy-tailed loss distribution and the high uncertainty pose difficulties for their application. We address these difficulties by comparing four empirical damage functions and providing model recommendations. In a broader context, we discuss the shape of the damage functions in the light of theoretical considerations.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint