Articles | Volume 18, issue 1
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 231–240, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-231-2018

Special issue: Damage of natural hazards: assessment and mitigation

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 231–240, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-231-2018

Research article 18 Jan 2018

Research article | 18 Jan 2018

Seismic assessment of a multi-span steel railway bridge in Turkey based on nonlinear time history

Mehmet F. Yılmaz and Barlas Ö. Çağlayan

Related subject area

Earthquake Hazards
Fault network reconstruction using agglomerative clustering: applications to southern Californian seismicity
Yavor Kamer, Guy Ouillon, and Didier Sornette
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3611–3625, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3611-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3611-2020, 2020
Short summary
Style of faulting of expected earthquakes in Italy as an input for seismic hazard modeling
Silvia Pondrelli, Francesco Visini, Andrea Rovida, Vera D'Amico, Bruno Pace, and Carlo Meletti
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3577–3592, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3577-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3577-2020, 2020
Short summary
The utility of earth science information in post-earthquake land-use decision-making: the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence in Aotearoa New Zealand
Mark C. Quigley, Wendy Saunders, Chris Massey, Russ Van Dissen, Pilar Villamor, Helen Jack, and Nicola Litchfield
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3361–3385, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3361-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3361-2020, 2020
Short summary
Spatiotemporal changes of seismicity rate during earthquakes
Chieh-Hung Chen, Yang-Yi Sun, Strong Wen, Peng Han, Li-Ching Lin, Huaizhong Yu, Xuemin Zhang, Yongxin Gao, Chi-Chia Tang, Cheng-Horng Lin, and Jann-Yenq Liu
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3333–3341, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3333-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3333-2020, 2020
Short summary
Deep learning of the aftershock hysteresis effect based on the elastic dislocation theory
Jin Chen, Hong Tang, and Wenkai Chen
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3117–3134, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3117-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3117-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Alam, M. S., Bhuiyan, M. A. R., and Billah, A. H. M. M.: Seismic fragility assessment of SMA-bar restrained multi-span continuous highway bridge isolated by different laminated rubber bearings in medium to strong seismic risk zones, Bull. Earthq. Eng., 10, 1885–1909, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9381-8, 2012. 
Banerjee, S. and Shinozuka, M.: Nonlinear static procedure for seismic vulnerability assessment of bridges, Comput. Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 22, 293–305, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2007.00486.x, 2007. 
Bignell, J. L., LaFave, J. M., Wilkey, J. P., and Hawkins, N. M.: 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Seismic Evaluation Of Vulnerable Highway Bridges With Wall Piers on Emergency Routes in Southern Illinois, 1–6 August 2004, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 286–299, 2004. 
Bruneau, M., Wilson, J. C., and Tremblay, R.: Performance of steel bridges during the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe, Japan) earthquake, Can. J. Civ. Eng., 23, 678–713, 1996. 
Byers, W. G.: Railroad Lifeline Damege in Earthquaked, 13th World Conf. Earthq. Eng., Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 324–335, 2004. 
Download
Short summary
This study focuses on the determination of seismic behavior and safety of specific bridges under seismic conditions. One of the nine intensity measures is selected considering practicality, efficiency, and proficiency. Component and system fragility curves are derived considering serviceability limits and component capacity. The results show that serves velocity limits has important effects on fragility curves of bridges and truss piers elements are the most vulnerable elements in the system.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint