Articles | Volume 17, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-781-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-781-2017
Research article
 | 
01 Jun 2017
Research article |  | 01 Jun 2017

Evaluating simplified methods for liquefaction assessment for loss estimation

Indranil Kongar, Tiziana Rossetto, and Sonia Giovinazzi

Related authors

Interdependence and dynamics of essential services in an extensive risk context: a case study in Montserrat, West Indies
V. L. Sword-Daniels, T. Rossetto, T. M. Wilson, and S. Sargeant
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 947–961, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-947-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-947-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Earthquake Hazards
Risk-informed representative earthquake scenarios for Valparaíso and Viña del Mar, Chile
Hugo Rosero-Velásquez, Mauricio Monsalve, Juan Camilo Gómez Zapata, Elisa Ferrario, Alan Poulos, Juan Carlos de la Llera, and Daniel Straub
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2667–2687, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2667-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2667-2024, 2024
Short summary
Harmonizing seismicity information in Central Asian countries: earthquake catalogue and active faults
Valerio Poggi, Stefano Parolai, Natalya Silacheva, Anatoly Ischuk, Kanatbek Abdrakhmatov, Zainalobudin Kobuliev, Vakhitkhan Ismailov, Roman Ibragimov, Japar Karaev, Paola Ceresa, and Paolo Bazzurro
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2597–2613, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2597-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2597-2024, 2024
Short summary
Comparing components for seismic risk modelling using data from the 2019 Le Teil (France) earthquake
Konstantinos Trevlopoulos, Pierre Gehl, Caterina Negulescu, Helen Crowley, and Laurentiu Danciu
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2383–2401, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2383-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2383-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modelling seismic ground motion and its uncertainty in different tectonic contexts: challenges and application to the 2020 European Seismic Hazard Model (ESHM20)
Graeme Weatherill, Sreeram Reddy Kotha, Laurentiu Danciu, Susana Vilanova, and Fabrice Cotton
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1795–1834, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1795-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1795-2024, 2024
Short summary
Scoring and ranking probabilistic seismic hazard models: an application based on macroseismic intensity data
Vera D'Amico, Francesco Visini, Andrea Rovida, Warner Marzocchi, and Carlo Meletti
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1401–1413, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1401-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1401-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Andrus, R. D. and Stokoe, K. H.: Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity, J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 126, 1015–1025, 2000.
Beaven, J., Motagh, M., Fielding, E. J., Donnelly, N., and Collett, D.: Fault slip models of the 2010–2011 Canterbury, New Zealand, earthquakes from geodetic data and observations of postseismic ground deformation, New Zeal. J. Geol. Geop., 55, 207–221, https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.2012.697472, 2012.
Bird, J. F. and Bommer, J. J.: Earthquake losses due to ground failure, Eng. Geol., 75, 147–179, 2004.
Bird, J. F., Bommer, J. J., Crowley, H., and Pinho, R.: Modelling liquefaction-induced building damage in earthquake loss estimation, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 26, 15–30, 2006.
Boore, D. M.: Estimating VS30 (or NEHRP site classes) from shallow velocity models (depths  <  30 m), B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 94, 591–597, 2004.
Download
Short summary
The purpose of this research is to evaluate the predictive capability of simplified liquefaction models that can be applied across wide geographical areas for insurance and risk management purposes. Predictions from nine models are compared to observations from the Canterbury earthquake sequence and finds that models based on a previously proposed Liquefaction Potential Index perform the best, whilst the commonly used HAZUS methodology does not perform well.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint