Articles | Volume 16, issue 10
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2227–2234, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2227-2016

Special issue: Resilience and v​ulnerability assessm​ents in natural haza​rds...

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2227–2234, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2227-2016

Research article 07 Oct 2016

Research article | 07 Oct 2016

Risk assessment in the North Caucasus ski resorts

Anton Y. Komarov et al.

Related subject area

Risk Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies, Socioeconomic and Management Aspects
Comparing an insurer's perspective on building damages with modelled damages from pan-European winter windstorm event sets: a case study from Zurich, Switzerland
Christoph Welker, Thomas Röösli, and David N. Bresch
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 279–299, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-279-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-279-2021, 2021
Short summary
Probabilistic characterisation of coastal storm-induced risks using Bayesian networks
Marc Sanuy and Jose A. Jiménez
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 219–238, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-219-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-219-2021, 2021
A glimpse into the future of exposure and vulnerabilities in cities? Modelling of residential location choice of urban population with random forest
Sebastian Scheuer, Dagmar Haase, Annegret Haase, Manuel Wolff, and Thilo Wellmann
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 203–217, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-203-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-203-2021, 2021
Short summary
Invited perspectives: Building sustainable and resilient communities – recommended actions for natural hazard scientists
Joel C. Gill, Faith E. Taylor, Melanie J. Duncan, Solmaz Mohadjer, Mirianna Budimir, Hassan Mdala, and Vera Bukachi
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 187–202, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-187-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-187-2021, 2021
Short summary
Design of parametric risk transfer solutions for volcanic eruptions: an application to Japanese volcanoes
Delioma Oramas-Dorta, Giulio Tirabassi, Guillermo Franco, and Christina Magill
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 99–113, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-99-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-99-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Bartelt, P., Bühler, Y., Buser, O., Christen, M., and Meier, L.: Modeling mass-dependent flow regime transitions to predict the stopping and depositional behavior of snow avalanches, J. Geophys. Res., 117, F01015, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JF001957, 2012.
Bohnenblust, H. and Troxler, C.: Risk analysis – Is it a tool for the politician in making decisions on avalanche safety?, Avalanche formation, movement and effects, Proceedings of the Davos Symposium, Switzerland, September 1986, IAHS Publ. no. 162, 1987.
Bolov, V. R. and Zalikhanov, M. Ch.: Avalanche hazard of Zakki-Don and Mamison-Don river valleys, Gidrometeoizdat Publishing house, Moscow, Russia, 1984.
Brugger, H., Etter, H. J., and Zweifel, B.: The impact of avalanche rescue devices on survival, Resuscitation, 75, 476–483, 2007.
The construction of infrastructure: available at: http://www.ncrc.ru/activities/stroitelstvo-infrastruktury/ (last access: 12 August 2016), 2015.
Download
Short summary
This paper presents the results of avalanche risk assessment methods research. The suggested method includes formulas to calculate collective and individual avalanche risk. The results of risk analysis are shown in quantitative data that can be used to determine levels of avalanche risk (appropriate, acceptable and inappropriate) and to suggest methods to decrease the individual risk to an acceptable level or better.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint