Articles | Volume 15, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1275-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1275-2015
Research article
 | 
18 Jun 2015
Research article |  | 18 Jun 2015

Forest damage and snow avalanche flow regime

T. Feistl, P. Bebi, M. Christen, S. Margreth, L. Diefenbach, and P. Bartelt

Related authors

Quantification of basal friction for technical and silvicultural glide-snow avalanche mitigation measures
T. Feistl, P. Bebi, L. Dreier, M. Hanewinkel, and P. Bartelt
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2921–2931, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2921-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2921-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Other Hazards (e.g., Glacial and Snow Hazards, Karst, Wildfires Hazards, and Medical Geo-Hazards)
Statistical calibration of probabilistic medium-range Fire Weather Index forecasts in Europe
Stephanie Bohlmann and Marko Laine
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4225–4235, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4225-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4225-2024, 2024
Short summary
Glide-snow avalanches: a mechanical, threshold-based release area model
Amelie Fees, Alec van Herwijnen, Michael Lombardo, Jürg Schweizer, and Peter Lehmann
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3387–3400, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3387-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3387-2024, 2024
Short summary
Improving fire severity prediction in south-eastern Australia using vegetation-specific information
Kang He, Xinyi Shen, Cory Merow, Efthymios Nikolopoulos, Rachael V. Gallagher, Feifei Yang, and Emmanouil N. Anagnostou
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3337–3355, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3337-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3337-2024, 2024
Short summary
Review article: A scoping review of human factors in avalanche decision-making
Audun Hetland, Rebecca Anne Hetland, Tarjei Tveito Skille, and Andrea Mannberg
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1628,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1628, 2024
Short summary
How hard do avalanche practitioners tap during snow stability tests?
Håvard B. Toft, Samuel V. Verplanck, and Markus Landrø
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2757–2772, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2757-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2757-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Baroudi, D., Sovilla, B., and Thibert, E.: Effects of flow regime and sensor geometry on snow avalanche impact-pressure measurements, J. Glaciol., 57, 277–288, 2011.
Bartelt, P. and Stöckli, V.: The influence of tree and branch fracture, overturning and debris on snow avalanche flow, Ann. Glaciol., 32, 209–216, 2001.
Bartelt, P., Feistl, T., Bühler, Y., and Buser, O.: Overcoming the stauchwall: Viscoelastic stress redistribution and the start of full-depth gliding snow avalanches, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L16501, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052479, 2012a.
Bartelt, P., Glover, J., Feistl, T., Bühler, Y., and Buser, O.: Formation of levees and en-echelon shear planes during snow avalanche run-out, J. Glaciol., 58, 980–992, 2012b.
Bartelt, P., Buser, O., Bühler, Y., Dreier, L., and Christen, M.: Numerical simulation of snow avalanches: Modelling dilatative processes with cohesion in rapid granular shear flows, in: Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering – Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering, NUMGE, 327–332, 2014.
Download
Short summary
Snow avalanches break, uproot and overturn trees, causing damage to forests. In this paper, we define avalanche loading cases representing four different avalanche flow regimes: powder, intermittent, dry and wet. Using a numerical model that simulates both powder and wet snow avalanches, we study documented events with forest damage. We find that powder clouds with velocities over 20m/s break tree stems and that quasi-static pressures of wet snow avalanches are much higher than dynamic pressure.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint