Articles | Volume 17, issue 3
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 397–407, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-397-2017
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 397–407, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-397-2017

Research article 13 Mar 2017

Research article | 13 Mar 2017

Control spectra for Quito

Roberto Aguiar et al.

Related authors

The role of GIS in urban seismic risk studies: application to the city of Almería (southern Spain)
A. Rivas-Medina, J. M. Gaspar-Escribano, B. Benito, and M. A. Bernabé
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2717–2725, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2717-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2717-2013, 2013

Related subject area

Risk Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies, Socioeconomic and Management Aspects
Comparing an insurer's perspective on building damages with modelled damages from pan-European winter windstorm event sets: a case study from Zurich, Switzerland
Christoph Welker, Thomas Röösli, and David N. Bresch
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 279–299, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-279-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-279-2021, 2021
Short summary
Probabilistic characterisation of coastal storm-induced risks using Bayesian networks
Marc Sanuy and Jose A. Jiménez
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 219–238, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-219-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-219-2021, 2021
A glimpse into the future of exposure and vulnerabilities in cities? Modelling of residential location choice of urban population with random forest
Sebastian Scheuer, Dagmar Haase, Annegret Haase, Manuel Wolff, and Thilo Wellmann
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 203–217, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-203-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-203-2021, 2021
Short summary
Invited perspectives: Building sustainable and resilient communities – recommended actions for natural hazard scientists
Joel C. Gill, Faith E. Taylor, Melanie J. Duncan, Solmaz Mohadjer, Mirianna Budimir, Hassan Mdala, and Vera Bukachi
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 187–202, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-187-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-187-2021, 2021
Short summary
Design of parametric risk transfer solutions for volcanic eruptions: an application to Japanese volcanoes
Delioma Oramas-Dorta, Giulio Tirabassi, Guillermo Franco, and Christina Magill
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 99–113, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-99-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-99-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Abrahamson, N. A., Silva, W. J., and Kamai, R.: Update of the AS08 Ground-Motion Prediction Equations Based on the NGA-West2 Data Set, PEER – Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Headquarters, University of California, Berkeley, 2013.
Aguiar, R.: Microzonificación Sísmica de Quito, 1st Edn., IPGH, Ecuador, p. 212, 2003.
Aguiar, R., Rivas, A., Benito, M., Gaspar, J., Trujillo, S., Arciniegas, S., Villalba, P., and Parra, H.: Aceleraciones registradas y calculadas del sismo del 12 de agosto de 2014 en Quito, Revista Ciencia, 16, 139–153, 2014.
Alvarado, A., Audin, L., Nocquet, J. M., Lagreulet, S., Segovia, M., Font, Y., Lamarque, G., Yepes, H., Mothes, P., Rolandone, F., Jarrin, P., and Quidelleur, X.: Active tectonics in Quito, Ecuador, assessed by geomorphological studies, GPS data, and crustal seismicity, Tectonics, 33, 67–83, https://doi.org/10.1002/2012tc003224, 2014.
Anderson, J.: Estimating the seismicity from geological structure for seismic-risk studies, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 69, 135–158, https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(79)90309-7, 1979.
Download
Short summary
In the Metropolitan District of Quito is located on or very close to five segments of reverse blind faults. The city is divided into five areas: south, south-central, central, north-central and north. For each of the urban areas, elastic response spectra are calculated considering the maximum magnitude. Subsequently, the recurrence period of earthquakes of maximum magnitude are presented.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint