Articles | Volume 16, issue 6
Research article
15 Jun 2016
Research article |  | 15 Jun 2016

A review of multivariate social vulnerability methodologies: a case study of the River Parrett catchment, UK

I. Willis and J. Fitton

Related subject area

Risk Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies, Socioeconomic and Management Aspects
Quantifying the potential benefits of risk-mitigation strategies on future flood losses in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal
Carlos Mesta, Gemma Cremen, and Carmine Galasso
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 711–731,,, 2023
Short summary
Review article: Potential of nature-based solutions to mitigate hydro-meteorological risks in sub-Saharan Africa
Kirk B. Enu, Aude Zingraff-Hamed, Mohammad A. Rahman, Lindsay C. Stringer, and Stephan Pauleit
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 481–505,,, 2023
Short summary
Invited perspectives: An insurer's perspective on the knowns and unknowns in natural hazard risk modelling
Madeleine-Sophie Déroche
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 251–259,,, 2023
Short summary
Classifying marine faults for hazard assessment offshore Israel: a new approach based on fault size and vertical displacement
May Laor and Zohar Gvirtzman
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 139–158,,, 2023
Short summary
Assessing agriculture's vulnerability to drought in European pre-Alpine regions
Ruth Stephan, Stefano Terzi, Mathilde Erfurt, Silvia Cocuccioni, Kerstin Stahl, and Marc Zebisch
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 45–64,,, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Adger, W. N., Brooks, N., Bentham, G., and Agnew, M.: New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research Technical Report, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Tyndall, P15–P19, 2004.
Bellù, L. G. and Liberati, P.: Inequality analysis: The gini index, EASYPol Module, FAO, 40 pp., (last access: June 2016), 2006.
Birkmann, J.: Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: Conceptual frameworks and definitions. Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies, United Nations University Press, 1, 9–54, 2006.
Birkmann, J., Cardona, O. D., Carreño, M. L., Barbat, A. H., Pelling, M., Schneiderbauer, S., Kienberger, S., Keiler, M., Alexander, D., Zeil, P., and Welle, T.: Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework, Nat. Hazards, 67, 193–211,, 2013.
Bolin, R., Jackson, M., and Crist, A.: Gender inequality, vulnerability, and disaster: Issues in theory and research. The gendered terrain of disaster: Through women's eyes, Canberra, Australia, 8–16, (last access: June 2016), 1998.
Short summary
In the field of Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR), there is a proliferation of research into different ways to measure, represent, and ultimately quantify differential social vulnerability to natural hazards. This study shows how the same census data but three alternative multivariate methodologies can lead to radical differences in our assessment of the most vulnerable population groups to flood risk. A case study of the 2013 floods in the Parrett catchment, Somerset (UK), provides context.
Final-revised paper