Articles | Volume 23, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1719-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1719-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
10 May 2023
Research article |
| 10 May 2023
| 10 May 2023
A user perspective on the avalanche danger scale – insights from North America
Abby Morgan
School of Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser
University, Burnaby, V5A 1S6, Canada
School of Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser
University, Burnaby, V5A 1S6, Canada
Henry Finn
School of Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser
University, Burnaby, V5A 1S6, Canada
School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh,
Edinburgh, EH8 9LD, UK
Patrick Mair
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138,
United States
Related authors
No articles found.
John Sykes, Pascal Haegeli, Roger Atkins, Patrick Mair, and Yves Bühler
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1255–1292, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1255-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1255-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We model the decision-making of professional ski guides and develop decision support tools to assist with determining appropriate terrain based on current conditions. Our approach compares a manually constructed Bayesian network with machine learning classification models. The models accurately capture the real-world decision-making outcomes in 85–93 % of cases. Our conclusions focus on strengths and weaknesses of each model and discuss ramifications for practical applications in ski guiding.
Florian Herla, Pascal Haegeli, Simon Horton, and Patrick Mair
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 625–646, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-625-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-625-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present a spatial framework for extracting information about avalanche problems from detailed snowpack simulations and compare the numerical results against operational assessments from avalanche forecasters. Despite good agreement in seasonal summary statistics, a comparison of daily assessments revealed considerable differences, while it remained unclear which data source represented reality the best. We discuss how snowpack simulations can add value to the forecasting process.
Simon Horton, Florian Herla, and Pascal Haegeli
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 193–209, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-193-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-193-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present a method for avalanche forecasters to analyze patterns in snowpack model simulations. It uses fuzzy clustering to group small regions into larger forecast areas based on snow characteristics, locations, and temporal history. Tested in the Columbia Mountains in two winter seasons, it closely matched real forecast regions regions and identified major avalanche hazard patterns. This approach simplifies complex model outputs, helping forecasters make informed decisions.
Florian Herla, Pascal Haegeli, Simon Horton, and Patrick Mair
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2727–2756, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2727-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2727-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Snowpack simulations are increasingly employed by avalanche warning services to inform about critical avalanche layers buried in the snowpack. However, validity concerns limit their operational value. We present methods that enable meaningful comparisons between snowpack simulations and regional assessments of avalanche forecasters to quantify the performance of the Canadian weather and snowpack model chain to represent thin critical avalanche layers on a large scale and in real time.
John Sykes, Håvard Toft, Pascal Haegeli, and Grant Statham
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 947–971, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-947-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-947-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The research validates and optimizes an automated approach for creating classified snow avalanche terrain maps using open-source geospatial modeling tools. Validation is based on avalanche-expert-based maps for two study areas. Our results show that automated maps have an overall accuracy equivalent to the average accuracy of three human maps. Automated mapping requires a fraction of the time and cost of traditional methods and opens the door for large-scale mapping of mountainous terrain.
John Sykes, Pascal Haegeli, and Yves Bühler
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3247–3270, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3247-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3247-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Automated snow avalanche terrain mapping provides an efficient method for large-scale assessment of avalanche hazards, which informs risk management decisions for transportation and recreation. This research reduces the cost of developing avalanche terrain maps by using satellite imagery and open-source software as well as improving performance in forested terrain. The research relies on local expertise to evaluate accuracy, so the methods are broadly applicable in mountainous regions worldwide.
Simon Horton and Pascal Haegeli
The Cryosphere, 16, 3393–3411, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3393-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3393-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Snowpack models can help avalanche forecasters but are difficult to verify. We present a method for evaluating the accuracy of simulated snow profiles using readily available observations of snow depth. This method could be easily applied to understand the representativeness of available observations, the agreement between modelled and observed snow depths, and the implications for interpreting avalanche conditions.
Florian Herla, Pascal Haegeli, and Patrick Mair
The Cryosphere, 16, 3149–3162, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3149-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3149-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present an averaging algorithm for multidimensional snow stratigraphy profiles that elicits the predominant snow layering among large numbers of profiles and allows for compiling of informative summary statistics and distributions of snowpack layer properties. This creates new opportunities for presenting and analyzing operational snowpack simulations in support of avalanche forecasting and may inspire new ways of processing profiles and time series in other geophysical contexts.
Kathryn C. Fisher, Pascal Haegeli, and Patrick Mair
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1973–2000, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1973-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1973-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Avalanche bulletins include travel and terrain statements to provide recreationists with tangible guidance about how to apply the hazard information. We examined which bulletin users pay attention to these statements, what determines their usefulness, and how they could be improved. Our study shows that reducing jargon and adding simple explanations can significantly improve the usefulness of the statements for users with lower levels of avalanche awareness education who depend on this advice.
Animesh K. Gain, Yves Bühler, Pascal Haegeli, Daniela Molinari, Mario Parise, David J. Peres, Joaquim G. Pinto, Kai Schröter, Ricardo M. Trigo, María Carmen Llasat, and Heidi Kreibich
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 985–993, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-985-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-985-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
To mark the 20th anniversary of Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS), an interdisciplinary and international journal dedicated to the public discussion and open-access publication of high-quality studies and original research on natural hazards and their consequences, we highlight 11 key publications covering major subject areas of NHESS that stood out within the past 20 years.
Kathryn C. Fisher, Pascal Haegeli, and Patrick Mair
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3219–3242, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3219-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3219-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Avalanche warning services publish condition reports to help backcountry recreationists make informed decisions about when and where to travel in avalanche terrain. We tested how different graphic representations of terrain information can affect users’ ability to interpret and apply the provided information. Our study shows that a combined presentation of aspect and elevation information is the most effective. These results can be used to improve avalanche risk communication products.
Cited articles
Aitsi-Selmi, A., Blanchard, K., and Murray, V.: Ensuring science is useful,
usable and used in global disaster risk reduction and sustainable
development: a view through the Sendai framework lens, Palgrave Communications, 2, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.16, 2016.
Akaike, H.: A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE T. Automat. Contr., 19, 716–723, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705, 1974.
Avalanche Canada: Forecast Archive, https://avalanche.ca/forecasts/archives, last access: 21 December 2021.
Avalanche Canada: Danger Ratings,
https://avysavvy.avalanche.ca/danger-ratings, last access: 23 July 2022.
Bloom, B. S.: Taxonomy of educational objectives, McKay, New York, Vol. 1:
Cognitive domain, 2–24, 1956.
Brotzge, J. and Donner, W.: The Tornado Warning Process: A Review of Current
Research, Challenges, and Opportunities, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 1715–1733, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00147.1, 2013.
Budescu, D. V., Por, H.-H., Broomell, S. B., and Smithson, M.: The interpretation of IPCC probabilistic statements around the world, Nat. Clim. Change, 4, 508–512, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2194, 2014.
Clark, T.: Exploring the link between the Conceptual Model of Avalanche
Hazard and the North American Public Avalanche Danger Scale, M.R.M. research
project no. 721, 2019-1, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, 116 pp., https://summit.sfu.ca/item/18786 (last access: 19 April 2023), 2019.
Collins, L. M. and Lanza, S. T.: Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences, John Wiley and Sons Inc., https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470567333, 2010.
Conger, S.: A Review of Colour and Cartography in Avalanche Danger
Visualization, in: Proceedings of the 2004 International Snow Science
Workshop, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, 477–482, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/item/1122 (last access: 19 April 2023), 2004.
Demuth, J. L., Morss, R. E., Palen, L., Anderson, K. M., Anderson, J.,
Kogan, M., Stowe, K., Bica, M., Lazrus, H., Wilhelmi, O., and Henderson, J.:
“Sometimes da #beachlife ain't always da wave”: Understanding People's
Evolving Hurricane Risk Communication, Risk Assessments, and Responses Using
Twitter Narratives, Weather Clim. Soc., 10, 537–560, https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-17-0126.1, 2018.
Dennis, A. and Moore, M.: Evolution of Public Avalanche Information: The
North American Experience with Avalanche Danger Rating Levels, in:
Proceedings of the 1996 International Snow Science Workshop, International
Snow Science Workshop, Banff, Alberta, 60–66, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/item/1405 (last access: 19 April 2023), 1996.
Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG) and the NOAA Social Science Committee: A Practical Guide for Natural Hazard Risk Communication, https://www.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/2022-08/Natural_Hazard_Risk_Communication_Practical_Guide.pdf (last access: 19 April 2023), 2019.
Engeset, R. V., Pfuhl, G., Landrø, M., Mannberg, A., and Hetland, A.: Communicating public avalanche warnings – what works?, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2537–2559, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2537-2018, 2018.
Environment and Climate Change Canada: About the Air Quality Health Index,
https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/air-quality-health-index/about.html,
last access: 24 July 2022.
European Avalanche Warning Services: Avalanche Danger Scale,
https://www.avalanches.org/education/avalanche-danger-scale/ (last access: 24 July 2022), 2021a.
European Avalanche Warning Services: Information Pyramid,
https://www.avalanches.org/standards/information-pyramid/ (last access: 24 July 2022), 2021b.
Eyland, T.: Avalanche danger ratings and deaths, putting things into
perspective, in: Proceedings of the 2018 International Snow Science Workshop, Innsbruck, Austria, 1501–1505, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/item/2808 (last access: 19 April 2023), 2018.
Finn, H.: Examining risk literacy in a complex decision-making environment:
A study of public avalanche bulletins, M.R.M. research project no. 745,
2020-1, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, 134 pp., https://summit.sfu.ca/item/20205 (last access: 19 April 2023), 2020.
Greene, E., Wiesinger, T., Birkeland, K., Coléou, C., Jones, A., and
Statham, G.: Fatal Avalanche Accidents and Forecasted Danger Levels:
Patterns in the United States, Canada, Switzerland and France, Proceedings
of the 2006 International Snow Science Workshop, Telluride, Colorado,
640–649, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/item/503 (last access: 19 April 2023), 2006.
Haegeli, P.: Avaluator V2.0 – Avalanche accident prevention card, Avalanche Canada, Revelstoke, BC, 30 pp., ISBN 978-0-9866597-2-0, 2010.
Haegeli, P. and Strong-Cvetich, L. R.: Using discrete choice experiments to
examine the stepwise nature of avalanche risk management decisions – An
example from mountain snowmobiling, Journal of Outdoor Recreation and
Tourism, 32, 100165, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2018.01.007, 2020.
Haegeli, P., Gunn, M., and Haider, W.: Identifying a High-Risk Cohort in a
Complex and Dynamic Risk Environment: Out-of-bounds Skiing – An Example from
Avalanche Safety, Prev. Sci., 13, 562–573,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0282-5, 2012.
Haegeli, P., Rupf, R., and Karlen, B.: Do avalanche airbags lead to riskier
choices among backcountry and out-of-bounds skiers?, Journal of Outdoor
Recreation and Tourism, 32, 100270, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2019.100270, 2020.
Haegeli, P., Morgan, A., Finn, H., Fisher, K., and Mair, P.: A user
perspective on the avalanche danger scale – Insights from North
America–Data and Code, OSF [code/data set], https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RTMYX,
2022.
Hancock, P. A. and Volante, W. G.: Quantifying the qualities of language,
PLoS ONE, 15, e0232198, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232198, 2020.
Harrison, X. A., Donaldson, L., Correa-Cano, M. E., Evans, J., Fisher, D. N., Goodwin, C. E. D., Robinson, B. S., Hodgson, D. J., and Inger, R.: A brief introduction to mixed effects modelling and multi-model inference in ecology, PeerJ, 6, e4794, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4794, 2018.
Harvey, S. and Zweifel, B.: New trends of recreational avalanche accidents
in Switzerland, in: Proceedings of the 2008 International Snow Science
Workshop, International Snow Science Workshop, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/item/151 (last access: 19 April 2023), 2008.
Herovic, E., Sellnow, T. L., and Sellnow, D. D.: Challenges and
opportunities for pre-crisis emergency risk communication: lessons learned
from the earthquake community, J. Risk Res., 23, 349–364,
https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2019.1569097, 2020.
Hogarth, R. M.: Educating Intuition, University of Chicago Press, 348 pp., ISBN: 978-0226348605, 2001.
Hogarth, R. M., Lejarraga, T., and Soyer, E.: The Two Settings of Kind and
Wicked Learning Environments, Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., 24, 379–385,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415591878, 2015.
Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., and Zeileis, A.: Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A
Conditional Inference Framework, J. Comput. Graph. Stat., 15, 651–674, https://doi.org/10.1198/106186006X133933, 2006.
Ipsos Reid: Avalanche Danger Scale Test – Avalanche Bulletin Users – Final
Report, 61 pp., 2009.
Jamieson, B., Haegeli, P., and Gauthier, D.: Avalanche Accidents in Canada
Vol. 5: 1996–2007, Canadian Avalanche Association, Revelstoke, BC, ISBN: 978-0986659744, 2010.
Jung, T. and Wickrama, K. A. S.: An introduction to latent class growth
analysis and growth mixture modeling, Social and Personality Psychology
Compass, 2, 302–317, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00054.x, 2008.
Kahneman, D.: Thinking, Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York,
NY, ISBN: 978-0385676533, 2011.
Kellens, W., Terpstra, T., and De Maeyer, P.: Perception and Communication
of Flood Risks: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research, Risk Anal., 33,
24–49, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01844.x, 2013.
Klassen, K.: Incorporating Terrain into Public Avalanche Information
Products, in: Proceedings of the 2012 International Snow Science Workshop,
209–213, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/item/1582 (last access: 19 April 2023), 2012.
Krathwohl, D. R.: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview, Theor. Pract., 41, 212–218, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2, 2002.
Langer, L., Hide, S., and Pearce, G.: Effectiveness of rural fire danger
warnings to New Zealand communities, in: Proceedings of Bushfire CRC &
AFAC 2011 Conference Science Day, Bushfire CRC & AFAC 2011 Conference
Science Day, 29 August–1 September 2011,
https://www.bushfirecrc.com/resources/presentation/effectiveness-rural-fire-danger-warnings-new-zealand-communities (last access: 19 April 2023), 2011.
Lazar, B., Trautman, S., Cooperstein, M., Greene, E., and Birkeland, K.:
North American Avalanche Danger Scale: Are Public Backcountry Forecasters
Applying it Consistently?, in: Proceedings of the 2016 International Snow
Science Workshop, International Snow Science Workshop, 457–465, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/item/2307 (last access: 19 April 2023), 2016.
Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Henry, N. W.: Latent structure analysis,
Houghton, Mifflin, New York, NY, 1968.
Lazrus, H., Morss, R. E., Demuth, J. L., Lazo, J. K., and Bostrom, A.:
“Know What to Do If You Encounter a Flash Flood”: Mental Models Analysis
for Improving Flash Flood Risk Communication and Public Decision Making,
Risk Anal., 36, 411–427, https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12480, 2016.
Linzer, D. A. and Lewis, J. B.: poLCA: An R Package for Polytomous Variable
Latent Class Analysis, J. Stat. Softw., 42, 1–29, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v042.i10, 2011.
Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., and Welch, N.: Risk as
feelings, Psychol. Bull., 127, 267–286, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267, 2001.
Lundgren, R. E. and McMakin, A. H.: Risk Communication: A Handbook for
Communicating Environmental, Safety, and Health Risks, 6th edn., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 544 pp., ISBN: 978-1119456117, 2018.
McClung, D. M.: Predictions in avalanche forecasting, Ann. Glaciol., 31, 377–381, https://doi.org/10.3189/172756400781820507, 2000.
Ménard, A. D., Houser, C., Brander, R. W., Trimble, S., and Scaman, A.:
The psychology of beach users: importance of confirmation bias, action, and
intention to improving rip current safety, Nat. Hazards, 94, 953–973,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3424-7, 2018.
Mileti, D. S. and Sorensen, J. H.: Communication of emergency public
warnings: A social science perspective and state-of-the-art assessment, Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN, United States, 149 pp., https://doi.org/10.2172/6137387, 1990.
Mitterer, C. and Mitterer, L.: 25 Jahre Europäische
Lawinengefahrenstufenskala, BergUndSteigen, 104, 67–76, 2018.
Morgan A.: A user perspective on the avalanche danger scale – Insights from
North America, M.R.M. research project no. 778, 2021-12, Simon Fraser
University, Burnaby, BC, 64 pp., https://summit.sfu.ca/item/35178 (last access: 19 April 2023), 2021.
Munter, W.: 3x3 Lawinen. Entscheiden in kiritischen Situationen, Pohl &
Schellhammer, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany, 220 pp., ISBN: 3-00-002060-8, 1997.
Muthén, B. and Muthén, L. K.: Integrating Person-Centered and
Variable-Centered Analyses: Growth Mixture Modeling With Latent Trajectory
Classes, Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res., 24, 882–891,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb02070.x, 2000.
Nakao, M. A. and Axelrod, S.: Numbers are better than words. Verbal
specifications of frequency have no place in medicine, Am. J. Med., 74,
1061–1065, https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(83)90819-7, 1983.
National Avalanche Center: An Introduction to the North American Avalanche Danger Scale, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_-KpOu7tbA (last access: 19 April 2023), 2016.
National Avalanche Center: Avalanche Safety – Get The Forecast,
https://avalanche.org/avalanche-tutorial/get-the-forecast.php, last access: 24 July 2022.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA): National Weather
Service Heat Forecast Tools, https://www.weather.gov/safety/heat-index, last access: 24 July 2022.
National Research Council: Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a
Democratic Society, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 264 pp., https://doi.org/10.17226/5138, 1996.
Nylund-Gibson, K. and Choi, A. Y.: Ten frequently asked questions about
latent class analysis, Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 4,
440–461, https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000176, 2018.
Pfeifer, C.: On probabilities of avalanches triggered by alpine skiers. An
empirically driven decision strategy for backcountry skiers based on these
probabilities, Nat. Hazards, 48, 425–438, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9270-2, 2009.
Proust-Lima, C., Philipps, V., and Liquet, B.: Estimation of Extended Mixed
Models Using Latent Classes and Latent Processes: The R Package lcmm,
J. Stat. Softw., 78, 1–56, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v078.i02, 2017.
Province of British Columbia: Fire Danger,
https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/safety/wildfire-status/wildfire-situation/fire-danger,
last access: 24 July 2022.
R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R
Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, https://www.R-project.org/, last access: 22 July 2022.
Schwarz, G.: Estimating the Dimension of a Model, Ann. Stat., 6, 461–464, https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136, 1978.
Schweizer, J., Mitterer, C., Techel, F., Stoffel, A., and Reuter, B.: On the relation between avalanche occurrence and avalanche danger level, The Cryosphere, 14, 737–750, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-737-2020, 2020.
Schweizer, J., Mitterer, C., Reuter, B., and Techel, F.: Avalanche danger level characteristics from field observations of snow instability, The Cryosphere, 15, 3293–3315, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3293-2021, 2021.
SLF (Swiss Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research): Danger levels,
https://www.slf.ch/en/avalanche-bulletin-and-snow-situation/about-the-avalanche-bulletin/danger-levels.html,
last access: 25 March 2023.
Slovic, P.: Perception of Risk, Science, 236, 280–285,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507, 1987.
Statham, G., Haegeli, P., Birkeland, K. W., Greene, E., Israelson, C.,
Tremper, B., Stethem, C., McMahon, B., White, B., and Kelly, J.: The North
American Public Avalanche Danger Scale, in: Proceedings of the 2010
International Snow Science Workshop, International Snow Science Workshop,
117–123, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/item/353 (last access: 19 April 2023), 2010.
Statham, G., Haegeli, P., Greene, E., Birkeland, K., Israelson, C., Tremper,
B., Stethem, C., McMahon, B., White, B., and Kelly, J.: A conceptual model
of avalanche hazard, Nat. Hazards, 90, 663–691,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3070-5, 2018a.
Statham, G., Holeczi, S., and Shandro, B.: Consistency and Accuracy of
Public Avalanche Forecasts in Western Canada, in: Proceedings of the 2018
International Snow Science Workshop, Innsbruck, Austria, 1491–1495, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/item/2806 (last access: 19 April 2023), 2018b.
St. Clair, A.: Exploring the Effectiveness of Avalanche Risk Communication:
A Qualitative Study of Avalanche Bulletin Use Among Backcountry
Recreationists, M.R.M. research project no. 738, Simon Fraser University,
Burnaby, BC, 110 pp., https://summit.sfu.ca/item/19807 (last access: 19 April 2023), 2019.
St. Clair, A., Finn, H., and Haegeli, P.: Where the rubber of the RISP model
meets the road: Contextualizing risk information seeking and processing with
an avalanche bulletin user typology, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 66, 102626, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102626, 2021.
Stoffel, A. and Meister, R.: Ten years experience with the five level
avalanche danger scale and the GIS database in Switzerland, in: Proceedings
of the 2004 International Snow Science Workshop, Jackson Hole, Wyoming,
545–554, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/item/1134 (last access: 19 April 2023), 2004.
Stoffel, L. and Schweizer, J.: Guidelines for avalanche control services:
Organization, hazard assessment and documentation – an example from
Switzerland, in: Proceedings of the 2008 International Snow Science
Workshop, Whistler, British Columbia, 483–489, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/item/75 (last access: 19 April 2023), 2008.
Sutton, J. and Woods, C.: Tsunami Warning Message Interpretation and Sense Making: Focus Group Insights, Weather Clim. Soc., 8, 389–398, https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-15-0067.1, 2016.
Techel, F. and Schweizer, J.: On using local avalanche danger level
estimates for regional forecast verification, Cold Reg. Sci. Tech., 144,
52–62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2017.07.012, 2017.
Techel, F., Zweifel, B., and Winkler, K.: Analysis of avalanche risk factors in backcountry terrain based on usage frequency and accident data in Switzerland, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1985–1997, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1985-2015, 2015.
Techel, F., Mayer, S., Pérez-Guillén, C., Schmudlach, G., and Winkler, K.: On the correlation between a sub-level qualifier refining the danger level with observations and models relating to the contributing factors of avalanche danger, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1911–1930, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1911-2022, 2022.
Terum, J. A., Mannberg, A., and Hovem, F. K.: Trend effects on perceived
avalanche hazard, Risk Anal., 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14003, 2022.
Thumlert, S., Statham, G., and Jamieson, B.: The likelihood scale in
avalanche forecasting, Avalanche Journal, Canadian Avalanche Association,
122, 24–28, 2019.
Utah Avalanche Center: Avalanche Danger Scale,
https://utahavalanchecenter.org/avalanche-danger-scale, last access: 24 July 2022.
van der Nest, G., Lima Passos, V., Candel, M., and Breukelen, G.: An
overview of mixture modelling for latent evolutions in longitudinal data:
Modelling approaches, fit statistics and software, Adv. Life Course Res., 43, 100323, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2019.100323, 2020.
Weber, E. U., Blais, A.-R., and Betz, N. E.: A domain-specific risk-attitude
scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors, J. Behav. Decis. Making, 15, 263–290, https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.414, 2002.
Winkler, K. and Techel, F.: Users' rating of the Swiss avalanche forecast,
in: Proceedings of the 2014 International Snow Science Conference, Banff,
Alberta, 437–444, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/item/2091 (last access: 19 April 2023), 2014.
Winkler, K., Schmudlach, G., Degraeuwe, B., and Techel, F.: On the
correlation between the forecast avalanche danger and avalanche risk taken
by backcountry skiers in Switzerland, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 188, 103299, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2021.103299, 2021.
Wintle, B. C., Fraser, H., Wills, B. C., Nicholson, A. E., and Fidler, F.:
Verbal probabilities: Very likely to be somewhat more confusing than
numbers, PLoS ONE, 14, e0213522, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213522, 2019.
Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A., and Smith, G. M.
(Eds.): Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R, Springer New
York, New York, NY, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6, 2009.
Short summary
The avalanche danger scale is a critical component for communicating the severity of avalanche hazard conditions to the public. We examine how backcountry recreationists in North America understand and use the danger scale for planning trips into the backcountry. Our results provide an important user perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of the existing scale and highlight opportunities for future improvements.
The avalanche danger scale is a critical component for communicating the severity of avalanche...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint