Cubrinovski, M., Bradley, B., Wotherspoon, L., Green, R., Bray, J., Wood, C., Pender, M., Allen, J., Bradshaw, A., Rix, G., Taylor, M., Robinson, K., Henderson, D., Giorgini, S., Ma, K., Winkley, A., Zupan, J., O'Rourke, T., DePascale, G., and Wells, D.: Geotechnical aspects of the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake, Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 44, 205–226,
https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.44.4.205-226, 2011.
a
Du, M., Liu, N., and Hu, X.: Techniques for interpretable machine learning, Commun. ACM, 63, 68–77,
https://doi.org/10.1145/3359786, 2020.
a
Earthquake Commission (EQC): Briefing to the Public Inquiry into the Earthquake Commission: Canterbury Home Repair Programme, Tech. Rep., PIES_010.1, 121 pp., EQC, Wellington, New Zealand,
https://www.eqc.govt.nz/assets/Publications-Resources/7-v3.-Canterbury-Home-Repair-Programme-Briefing-rs.pdf (last access: 15 November 2022), 2019. a
Esri: ArcGIS Desktop 10.7.1, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA, 2019.
a,
b
Feltham, C.: Insurance and reinsurance issues after the Canterbury earthquakes, Parliamentary Library Reasearch Paper, 1–2,
https://www.parliament.nz/resource/en-NZ/00PlibCIP161/e9e4aba0e5a8b0eccf517d16183735b2f3c871a5 (last access: 4 March 2023), 2011. a
GeoNet: GeoNet Strong Motion Data Tool,
https://strongmotion.geonet.org.nz/ (last access: 20 June 2021), 2012. a
Géron, A.: Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow, O'Reilly Media, 3rd edn., ISBN: 9781098122461, 1098122461, 2022. a
Ghimire, S., Guéguen, P., Giffard-Roisin, S., and Schorlemmer, D.: Testing machine learning models for seismic damage prediction at a regional scale using building-damage dataset compiled after the 2015 Gorkha Nepal earthquake, Earthq. Spectra, 38, 2970–2993,
https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930221106495, 2022.
a
Harirchian, E., Kumari, V., Jadhav, K., Rasulzade, S., Lahmer, T., and Das, R. R.: A synthesized study based on machine learning approaches for rapid classifying earthquake damage grades to rc buildings, Appl. Sci.-Basel, 11, 7540,
https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167540, 2021.
a
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J.: The Elements of Statistical Learning, Springer Series in Statistics, Springer, New York,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7, 2009.
a
Insurance Council of New Zealand (ICNZ): Canterbury Earthquakes,
https://www.icnz.org.nz/natural-disasters/canterbury-earthquakes/, last access: 3 October 2021.
a,
b
Kaiser, A., Van Houtte, C., Perrin, N., Wotherspoon, L., and Mcverry, G.: Site Characterisation of GeoNet Stations for the New Zealand Strong Motion Database, Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 50, 39–49,
https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.50.1.39-49, 2017.
a
Kalakonas, P. and Silva, V.: Seismic vulnerability modelling of building portfolios using artificial neural networks, Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 51, 310–327,
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3567, 2022b.
a
Kiani, J., Camp, C., and Pezeshk, S.: On the application of machine learning techniques to derive seismic fragility curves, Comput. Struct., 218, 108–122,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.03.004, 2019.
a
Kim, T., Song, J., and Kwon, O. S.: Pre- and post-earthquake regional loss assessment using deep learning, Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 49, 657–678,
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3258, 2020.
a
King, A., Middleton, D., Brown, C., Johnston, D., and Johal, S.: Insurance: Its Role in Recovery from the 2010–2011 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence, Earthq. Spectra, 30, 475–491,
https://doi.org/10.1193/022813EQS058M, 2014.
a
Land Information New Zealand (LINZ): NZ Property Titles, LINZ Data Service [data set],
https://data.linz.govt.nz/layer/50804-nz-property-titles/ (last access: 5 June 2022), 2020a. a
Land Information New Zealand (LINZ): NZ Street Address, LINZ Data Service [data set],
https://data.linz.govt.nz/layer/53353-nz-street-address/ (last access: 5 June 2022), 2020b. a
Lemaître, G., Nogueira, F., and Aridas, C. K.: Imbalanced-learn: A Python Toolbox to Tackle the Curse of Imbalanced Datasets in Machine Learning, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 18, 1–5,
http://jmlr.org/papers/v18/16-365.html (last access: 16 October 2021), 2017. a
Lundberg, S. M. and Lee, S.-I.: A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017), edited by: Guyon, I., Von Luxburg, U., Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Fergus, R., Vishwanathan, S., and Garnett, R., Curran Associates, Inc.,
https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/file/8a20a8621978632d76c43dfd28b67767-Paper.pdf (last access: 20 October 2020), 2017. a
Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G. G., and Lee, S.-I.: Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensembles, 2017 ICML Workshop, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.03888, 7 March 2019.
a,
b
Mangalathu, S. and Burton, H. V.: Deep learning-based classification of earthquake-impacted buildings using textual damage descriptions, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 36, 101111,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101111, 2019.
a
Mangalathu, S., Hwang, S. H., Choi, E., and Jeon, J. S.: Rapid seismic damage evaluation of bridge portfolios using machine learning techniques, Eng. Struct., 201, 109785,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109785, 2019.
a
Mangalathu, S., Sun, H., Nweke, C. C., Yi, Z., and Burton, H. V.: Classifying earthquake damage to buildings using machine learning, Earthq. Spectra, 36, 183–208,
https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019878137, 2020.
a
Molnar, C.: Interpretable Machine Learning. A Guide for Making Black Box Models Explainable, ISBN-13: 979-8411463330
https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/, last access: 13 June 2022.
a,
b
New Zealand Government: Earthquake Commission Act 1993 – 1 April 2008,
https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0084/7.0/DLM305968.html (last access: 14 July 2022), 2008.
a,
b
Ng, A.: CS230 Deep Learning - C3M1: ML Strategy (1), CS230 Deep Learning class, Stanford University,
https://cs230.stanford.edu/files/C3M1.pdf (last access: 3 July 2022), 2021.
a,
b
NIWA and GNS Science: RiskScape - Asset Module Metadata, GitHub [data set],
https://bit.ly/RiskScapeAssetModuleMetadata20151204 (last access: 25 November 2022), 2015. a
NIWA and GNS Science: RiskScape,
https://www.riskscape.org.nz/ (last access: 6 December 2022), 2017.
a,
b
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., and Duchesnay, E.: Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12, 2825–2830,
https://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume12/pedregosa11a/pedregosa11a.pdf (last access: 15 March 2022), 2011.
a,
b,
c,
d
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., and Guestrin, C.: “Why Should I Trust You?”: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier, in: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Demonstrations, San Diego, California, 1135–1144,
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N16-3020, 2016a.
a
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., and Guestrin, C.: Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learning, in: 2016 ICML Workshop on Human Interpretability in Machine Learning (WHI 2016), New York, NY, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1606.05386, 16 June 2016b.
a
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., and Guestrin, C.: Anchors: High-Precision Model-Agnostic Explanations, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'18), 32, 1527–1535,
https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11491, 2018.
a
Roeslin, S.: Predicting Seismic Damage and Loss for Residential Buildings using Data Science, PhD thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand,
https://hdl.handle.net/2292/57074 (last access: 18 December 2022), 2021. a
Roeslin, S., Ma, Q., Wicker, J., and Wotherspoon, L.: Data Integration for the Development of a Seismic Loss Prediction Model for Residential Buildings in New Zealand, in: Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, edited by: Cellier, P. and Driessens, K., Springer, Cham, Switzerland, Comm. Com. Inf. Sc., 1168, 88–100,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43887-6_8, 2020.
a
Rogers, N., van Ballegooy, S., Williams, K., and Johnson, L.: Considering Post-Disaster Damage to Residential Building Construction - Is Our Modern Building Construction Resilient?, in: 6th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (6ICEGE), Christchurch, New Zealand, 1–4 November 2015,
https://www.issmge.org/publications/publication/considering-postdisaster-damage-to-residential-building-construction-is-
our-modern-building-construction-resilient
(last access: 4 March 2023), 2015.
a
Russell, J. and van Ballegooy, S.: Canterbury Earthquake Sequence: Increased Liquefaction Vulnerability assessment methodology, Tonkin & Taylor Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand, Tech. rep., 0028-1-R-JICR-2015, 204 pp.,
https://www.eqc.govt.nz/assets/Publications-Resources/CES-
Increased-Liquefaction-Vulnerability-Assessment-Methodology
-T+T-Report.pdf
(last access: 23 April 2022), 2015.
a,
b
Stojadinović, Z., Kovačević, M., Marinković, D., and Stojadinović, B.: Rapid earthquake loss assessment based on machine learning and representative sampling, Earthq. Spectra, 38, 152–177,
https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930211042393, 2022.
a
Sun, H., Burton, H. V., and Huang, H.: Machine Learning Applications for Building Structural Design and Performance Assessment: State-of-the-Art Review, Journal of Building Engineering, 33, 101816,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101816, 2020.
a
Van Houtte, C., Bannister, S., Holden, C., Bourguignon, S., and Mcverry, G.: The New Zealand strong motion database, Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 50, 1–20,
https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.50.1.1-20, 2017.
a
Wood, C. M., Cox, B. R., Wotherspoon, L. M., and Green, R. A.: Dynamic site
characterization of Christchurch strong motion stations, Bulletin of the New
Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 44, 195–204,
https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.44.4.195-204, 2011.
a
Xie, Y., Ebad Sichani, M., Padgett, J. E., and DesRoches, R.: The promise of implementing machine learning in earthquake engineering: A state-of-the-art review, Earthq. Spectra, 36, 1769–1801,
https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020919419, 2020.
a
Zhang, Y., Burton, H. V., Sun, H., and Shokrabadi, M.: A machine learning framework for assessing post-earthquake structural safety, Struct. Saf., 72, 1–16,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.12.001, 2018.
a
