Articles | Volume 21, issue 10
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2993–3014, 2021
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2993–3014, 2021

Research article 07 Oct 2021

Research article | 07 Oct 2021

Integrating empirical models and satellite radar can improve landslide detection for emergency response

Katy Burrows et al.

Related authors

A systematic exploration of satellite radar coherence methods for rapid landslide detection
Katy Burrows, Richard J. Walters, David Milledge, and Alexander L. Densmore
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3197–3214,,, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Landslides and Debris Flows Hazards
Debris flow event on Osorno volcano, Chile, during summer 2017: new interpretations for chain processes in the southern Andes
Ivo Janos Fustos-Toribio, Bastian Morales-Vargas, Marcelo Somos-Valenzuela, Pablo Moreno-Yaeger, Ramiro Muñoz-Ramirez, Ines Rodriguez Araneda, and Ningsheng Chen
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3015–3029,,, 2021
Short summary
Evaluating methods for debris-flow prediction based on rainfall in an Alpine catchment
Jacob Hirschberg, Alexandre Badoux, Brian W. McArdell, Elena Leonarduzzi, and Peter Molnar
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2773–2789,,, 2021
Short summary
Optimizing and validating the Gravitational Process Path model for regional debris-flow runout modelling
Jason Goetz, Robin Kohrs, Eric Parra Hormazábal, Manuel Bustos Morales, María Belén Araneda Riquelme, Cristián Henríquez, and Alexander Brenning
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2543–2562,,, 2021
Short summary
Geographic-information-system-based topographic reconstruction and geomechanical modelling of the Köfels rockslide
Christian Zangerl, Annemarie Schneeberger, Georg Steiner, and Martin Mergili
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2461–2483,,, 2021
Short summary
Spatiotemporal clustering of flash floods in a changing climate (China, 1950–2015)
Nan Wang, Luigi Lombardo, Marj Tonini, Weiming Cheng, Liang Guo, and Junnan Xiong
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2109–2124,,, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Aimaiti, Y., Liu, W., Yamazaki, F., and Maruyama, Y.: Earthquake-Induced Landslide Mapping for the 2018 Hokkaido Eastern Iburi Earthquake Using PALSAR-2 Data, Remote Sens., 11, 2351,, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f
Allstadt, K. E., Jibson, R. W., Thompson, E. M., Massey, C. I., Wald, D. J., Godt, J. W., and Rengers, F. K.: Improving Near-Real-Time Coseismic Landslide Models: Lessons Learned from the 2016 Kaikōura, New Zealand, Earthquake Improving Near-Real-Time Coseismic Landslide Models, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 108, 1649–1664, 2018. a
Au, T. C.: Random forests, decision trees, and categorical predictors: the “Absent levels” problem, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 19, 1737–1766, 2018. a, b
Breiman, L.: Random forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32, 2001. a, b, c
Burrows, K., Walters, R. J., Milledge, D., Spaans, K., and Densmore, A. L.: A New Method for Large-Scale Landslide Classification from Satellite Radar, Remote Sens., 11, 237,, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
Short summary
When cloud cover obscures optical satellite imagery, there are two options remaining for generating information on earthquake-triggered landslide locations: (1) models which predict landslide locations based on, e.g., slope and ground shaking data and (2) satellite radar data, which penetrates cloud cover and is sensitive to landslides. Here we show that the two approaches can be combined to give a more consistent and more accurate model of landslide locations after an earthquake.
Final-revised paper