Articles | Volume 18, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1583-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1583-2018
Research article
 | 
08 Jun 2018
Research article |  | 08 Jun 2018

Usability of aerial video footage for 3-D scene reconstruction and structural damage assessment

Johnny Cusicanqui, Norman Kerle, and Francesco Nex

Related authors

3D City Digital Twin Simulation to Mitigate Heat Risk of Urban Heat Islands
Aulia Imania Sukma, Mila N. Koeva, Diana Reckien, Marija Bockarjova, Andre da Silva Mano, Giulia Canili, Giovanni Vicentini, and Norman Kerle
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W11-2024, 129–136, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W11-2024-129-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W11-2024-129-2024, 2024
HYBRID ADJUSTMENT OF UAS-BASED LiDAR AND IMAGE DATA
Y. Yadav, B. Alsadik, F. Nex, F. Remondino, and P. Glira
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W2-2023, 633–640, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-633-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-633-2023, 2023
ICEPY4D: A PYTHON TOOLKIT FOR ADVANCED MULTI-EPOCH GLACIER MONITORING WITH DEEP-LEARNING PHOTOGRAMMETRY
F. Ioli, F. Barbieri, F. Gaspari, F. Nex, and L. Pinto
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W2-2023, 1037–1044, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-1037-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-1037-2023, 2023
VEHICLE TRACKING AND SPEED ESTIMATION FROM UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES USING SEGMENTATION-INITIALISED TRACKERS
S. M. Tilon and F. Nex
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., X-1-W1-2023, 431–437, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-1-W1-2023-431-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-1-W1-2023-431-2023, 2023
MONO-HYDRA: REAL-TIME 3D SCENE GRAPH CONSTRUCTION FROM MONOCULAR CAMERA INPUT WITH IMU
U. V. B. L. Udugama, G. Vosselman, and F. Nex
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., X-1-W1-2023, 439–445, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-1-W1-2023-439-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-1-W1-2023-439-2023, 2023

Related subject area

Databases, GIS, Remote Sensing, Early Warning Systems and Monitoring Technologies
Insights into the development of a landslide early warning system prototype in an informal settlement: the case of Bello Oriente in Medellín, Colombia
Christian Werthmann, Marta Sapena, Marlene Kühnl, John Singer, Carolina Garcia, Tamara Breuninger, Moritz Gamperl, Bettina Menschik, Heike Schäfer, Sebastian Schröck, Lisa Seiler, Kurosch Thuro, and Hannes Taubenböck
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1843–1870, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1843-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1843-2024, 2024
Short summary
Tsunami hazard perception and knowledge of alert: early findings in five municipalities along the French Mediterranean coastlines
Johnny Douvinet, Noé Carles, Pierre Foulquier, and Matthieu Peroche
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 715–735, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-715-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-715-2024, 2024
Short summary
Exploiting radar polarimetry for nowcasting thunderstorm hazards using deep learning
Nathalie Rombeek, Jussi Leinonen, and Ulrich Hamann
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 133–144, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-133-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-133-2024, 2024
Short summary
Machine-learning-based nowcasting of the Vögelsberg deep-seated landslide: why predicting slow deformation is not so easy
Adriaan L. van Natijne, Thom A. Bogaard, Thomas Zieher, Jan Pfeiffer, and Roderik C. Lindenbergh
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3723–3745, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3723-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3723-2023, 2023
Short summary
Fixed photogrammetric systems for natural hazard monitoring with high spatio-temporal resolution
Xabier Blanch, Marta Guinau, Anette Eltner, and Antonio Abellan
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3285–3303, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3285-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3285-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Ahmed, M. T., Dailey, M. N., Landabaso, J. L., and Herrero, N.: Robust Key Frame Extraction for 3D Reconstruction from Video Streams, in: VISAPP (1), edited by: Richard, P. and Braz, J., 231–236, INSTICC Press, http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/visapp/visapp2010-1.html#AhmedDLH10, 2010. a
Alsadik, B., Gerke, M., and Vosselman, G.: Efficient use of video for 3D modelling of cultural heritage objects, ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, II-3/W4, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-II-3-W4-1-2015, 2015. a, b, c, d, e
Clift, L. G. and Clark, A. F.: Video frame extraction for 3D reconstruction, in: 2016 8th Computer Science and Electronic Engineering (CEEC), 152–157, https://doi.org/10.1109/CEEC.2016.7835905, 2016. a, b
CloudCompare: CloudCompare 3D point cloud and mesh processing software Open Source Project, http://www.cloudcompare.org/, 2017. (last access: 29 May 2018) a
Download
Short summary
Aerial multi-perspective images can be used for the effective assessment of post-disaster structural damage. Alternatively, rapidly available video data can be processed for the same purpose. However, video quality characteristics are different than those of images taken with still cameras. The use of video data in post-disaster damage assessment has not been demonstrated. Based on a comparative assessment, our findings support the application of video data in post-disaster damage assessment.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint