Usability of aerial video footage for 3-D scene reconstruction   and structural damage assessment

Cusicanqui, Johnny; Kerle, Norman; Nex, Francesco

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1583-2018

Articles | Volume 18, issue 6

https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1583-2018

© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1583-2018

© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 18, issue 6

Research article

|

08 Jun 2018

Research article |

| 08 Jun 2018

Usability of aerial video footage for 3-D scene reconstruction and structural damage assessment

Johnny Cusicanqui, Norman Kerle, and Francesco Nex

Download

Final revised paper (published on 08 Jun 2018)
Preprint (discussion started on 08 Jan 2018)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC1: 'Usability of aerial video footage for 3D-scene reconstruction and structural damage assessment', Anonymous Referee #1, 23 Feb 2018
- AC1: 'Response RC1', Johnny Cusicanqui, 25 Mar 2018
RC2: 'Comments to Usability of aerial video footage for 3D-scene reconstruction and structural damage assessment', Anonymous Referee #2, 16 Mar 2018
- AC2: 'Response RC2', Johnny Cusicanqui, 25 Mar 2018

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (10 Apr 2018) by Filippo Catani

AR by Johnny Cusicanqui on behalf of the Authors (17 Apr 2018) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (08 May 2018) by Filippo Catani

AR by Johnny Cusicanqui on behalf of the Authors (10 May 2018)

Short summary

Aerial multi-perspective images can be used for the effective assessment of post-disaster structural damage. Alternatively, rapidly available video data can be processed for the same purpose. However, video quality characteristics are different than those of images taken with still cameras. The use of video data in post-disaster damage assessment has not been demonstrated. Based on a comparative assessment, our findings support the application of video data in post-disaster damage assessment.