EAWS: Standards: Avalanche danger scale,
https://www.avalanches.org/standards/avalanche-danger-scale/,
last access: 3 November 2020. a
EAWS: Definition of avalanche danger, avalanche danger level and their
contributing factors; presented at EAWS General Assembly, Davos, Switzerland,
2021, EAWS working group Matrix and Scale (working group members: Müller,
K., Bellido, G., Bertrando, L., Feistl, T., Mitterer, C., Palmgren, P.,
Sofia, S., and Techel, F.). presented at: EAWS General Assembly, Davos,
Switzerland, June 2021, 2021.
a,
b,
c
Efron, B.: Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife, Ann.
Stat., 7, 1–26,
1979. a
Engeset, R. V., Pfuhl, G., Landrø, M., Mannberg, A., and Hetland, A.: Communicating public avalanche warnings – what works?, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2537–2559,
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2537-2018, 2018.
a
Floyer, J., Klassen, K., Horton, S., and Haegeli, P.: Looking to the 20's:
computer-assisted avalanche forecasting in Canada, in: Proceedings ISSW 2016.
International Snow Science Workshop, 2–7 October 2016, Breckenridge, Co.,
1245–1249, 2016. a
Goffin, R. and Olson, J.: Is it all relative? Comparative judgments and the
possible improvement of self-ratings and ratings of others, Perspect.
Psychol. Sci., 6, 48–60, 2011. a
Hutter, V., Techel, F., and Purves, R. S.: How is avalanche danger described in textual descriptions in avalanche forecasts in Switzerland? Consistency between forecasters and avalanche danger, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3879–3897,
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3879-2021, 2021.
a,
b,
c,
d
Kahneman, D., Sibony, O., and Sunstein, C.: Noise: A flaw in human judgment,
William Collins, London, U.K., 2021.
a,
b,
c,
d
Kuter, K.: Essential probability theory for data science (DSCI 500B), Saint
Mary's College,
https://stats.libretexts.org/Courses/Saint_Mary's_College_Notre_Dame/DSCI_500B_Essential_Probability_Theory_for_Data_Science_(Kuter) (last access: 8 February 2022), 2020. a
Lehning, M., Bartelt, P., Brown, B., Russi, T., Stöckli, U., and Zimmerli,
M.: Snowpack model calculations for avalanche warning based upon a new
network of weather and snow stations, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 30, 145–157,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-232X(99)00022-1, 1999.
a
Lehning, M., Bartelt, P., Brown, R., Fierz, C., and Satyawali, P.: A physical
SNOWPACK model for the Swiss avalanche warning; Part II. Snow
microstructure, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 35, 147–167, 2002.
a,
b
Logan, S. and Greene, E.: Patterns in avalanch
e events and regional scale
avalanche forecasts in Colorado, USA, in: Proceedings ISSW 2018.
International Snow Science Workshop, 7–12 October 2018, Innsbruck, Austria,
1059–1062, 2018. a
MacGregor, D.: Principles of forecasting: a handbook for researchers and
practitioners, vol. 30 of International Series in Operations Research &
Management Science, chap. Decomposition for judgmental forecasting and
estimation, 107–123, Springer, Boston, MA,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3_6, 2001.
a
Mayer, S., van Herwijnen, A., Techel, F., and Schweizer, J.: A random forest model to assess snow instability from simulated snow stratigraphy, The Cryosphere Discuss. [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-34, in review, 2022.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
MeteoSwiss: COSMO forecasting system,
https://www.meteoswiss.admin.ch/home/measurement-and-forecasting-systems/warning-and-forecasting-systems/cosmo-forecasting-system.html,
last access: 6 January 2022. a
Miller, G.: The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our
capacity for processing information, Psychol. Rev., 63, 81–97,
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158, 1956.
a
Morin, S., Horton, S., Techel, F., Bavay, M., Coléou, C., Fierz, C., Gobiet,
A., Hagenmuller, P., Lafaysse, M., Ližar, M., Mitterer, C., Monti, F.,
Müller, K., Olefs, M., Snook, J. S., van Herwijnen, A., and Vionnet, V.:
Application of physical snowpack models in support of operational avalanche
hazard forecasting: A status report on current implementations and prospects
for the future, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 170, p. 102910,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.102910, 2019.
a,
b
Pérez-Guillén, C., Techel, F., Hendrick, M., Volpi, M., van Herwijnen, A., Olevski, T., Obozinski, G., Pérez-Cruz, F., and Schweizer, J.: Data-driven automated predictions of the avalanche danger level for dry-snow conditions in Switzerland, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2021-341, in review, 2021.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R
Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria,
https://www.R-project.org/ (last access: 2 June 2022), 2020. a
Ridout, M., Demetrio, C., and Hinde, J.: Models for count data with many zeros,
in: International Biometric Conference, Cape Town, Dec 1998, p. 13,
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Models-for-count-data-with-many-zeros-Ridout-Dem%C3%A9trio/6a99f29a84a90284dabc3396296ab6cea806aa37 (last access: 2 June 2022),
1998. a
Schmudlach, G.: Avalanche Risk Property Dataset (ARPD),
https://info.skitourenguru.ch/download/data/ARPD_Manual_3.0.13.pdf,
(last access: 30 November 2021), [data set], 2021.
a,
b
Schmudlach, G.: Skitourenguru,
https://www.skitourenguru.ch,
last access: 6 January 2022. a
Schmudlach, G. and Köhler, J.: Automated avalanche risk rating of backcountry
ski routes, in: Proceedings ISSW 2016. International Snow Science Workshop,
2–7 October 2016, Breckenridge, Co., 2016, pp. 450–456, 2016. a
Schmudlach, G., Harvey, S., and Dürr, L.: How do experts interpret avalanche
terrain from a map?, in: Proceedings ISSW 2018. International Snow Science
Workshop, 7–12 Oct 2018, Innsbruck, Austria, 1674–1680, 2018. a
Schweizer, J.: The Rutschblock test – procedure and application in
Switzerland, The Avalanche Review, 20, 14–15, 2002. a
Schweizer, J., Kronholm, K., and Wiesinger, T.: Verification of regional
snowpack stability and avalanche danger, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 37,
277–288,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-232X(03)00070-3, 2003.
a
Schweizer, J., Mitterer, C., Techel, F., Stoffel, A., and Reuter, B.: On the relation between avalanche occurrence and avalanche danger level, The Cryosphere, 14, 737–750,
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-737-2020, 2020.
a
Schweizer, J., Mitterer, C., Reuter, B., and Techel, F.: Avalanche danger level characteristics from field observations of snow instability, The Cryosphere, 15, 3293–3315,
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3293-2021, 2021.
a
Simenhois, R. and Birkeland, K.: The Extended Column Test: Test effectiveness,
spatial variability, and comparison with the Propagation Saw Test, Cold
Reg. Sci. Technol., 59, 210–216,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2009.04.001, 2009.
a,
b
SLF: Avalanche bulletin interpretation guide, WSL Institute for Snow and
Avalanche Research SLF, 53 p.,
https://www.slf.ch/files/user_upload/SLF/Lawinenbulletin_Schneesituation/Wissen_zum_Lawinenbulletin/Interpretationshilfe/Interpretationshilfe_EN.pdf (last access: 1 May 2022), 2020.
a,
b
SLF: SLF-Beobachterhandbuch (observational guidelines), 55 p.,
https://www.dora.lib4ri.ch/wsl/islandora/object/wsl:24954/datastream/PDF/WSL-Institut_f%C3%83%C2%BCr_Schnee-_und_Lawinenforschung_SLF-2020-SLF-Beobachterhandbuch-(published_version).pdf (last access: 1 May 2022), 2020.
a,
b,
c,
d
SLF: Description of automated stations,
https://www.slf.ch/en/avalanche-bulletin-and-snow-situation/measured-values/description-of-automated-stations.html,
last access: 6 January 2022. a
St. Clair, A., Finn, H., and Hageli, P.: Where the rubber of the RISP model
meets the road: Contextualizing risk information seeking and processing with
an avalanche bulletin user typology, Int. J. Disaster Risk
Red., 66, 102626,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102626, 2021.
a
Statham, G., Haegeli, P., Greene, E., Birkeland, K., Israelson, C., Tremper,
B., Stethem, C., McMahon, B., White, B., and Kelly, J.: A conceptual model of
avalanche hazard, Nat. Hazard., 90, 663–691,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3070-5, 2018a.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f
Statham, G., Holeczi, S., and Shandro, B.: Consistency and accuracy of public
avalanche forecasts in Western Canada, in: Proceedings ISSW 2018,
International Snow Science Workshop, 7–12 October 2018, Innsbruck, Austria,
1491–1496, 2018b. a
Techel, F., Müller, K., and Schweizer, J.: On the importance of snowpack stability, the frequency distribution of snowpack stability, and avalanche size in assessing the avalanche danger level, The Cryosphere, 14, 3503–3521,
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3503-2020, 2020a.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f
Techel, F., Pielmeier, C., and Winkler, K.: Refined dry-snow avalanche danger
ratings in regional avalanche forecasts: consistent? And better than random?,
Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 180, 103162,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2020.103162, 2020b.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
Techel, F., Winkler, K., Walcher, M., van Herwijnen, A., and Schweizer, J.: On snow stability interpretation of extended column test results, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1941–1953,
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1941-2020, 2020c.
a,
b,
c
Walcher, M., Mitterer, C., and Lanzanasto, N.: A concept of harmonizing
regional avalanche forecasting, in: Proceedings ISSW 2018, International Snow
Science Workshop, 7–12 October 2018, Innsbruck, Austria, 1166–1171, 2018. a
Wilks, D.: Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences, vol. 100 of International Geophysics Series, Academic Press, San Diego CA, USA, 3rd
edn., 2011. a
Winkler, K., Schmudlach, G., Degraeuwe, B., and Techel, F.: On the correlation
between the forecast avalanche danger and avalanche risk taken by backcountry
skiers in Switzerland, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 188, 103299,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2021.103299, 2021.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g
