Articles | Volume 24, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3387-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3387-2024
Research article
 | 
02 Oct 2024
Research article |  | 02 Oct 2024

Glide-snow avalanches: a mechanical, threshold-based release area model

Amelie Fees, Alec van Herwijnen, Michael Lombardo, Jürg Schweizer, and Peter Lehmann

Related authors

The source, quantity, and spatial distribution of interfacial water during glide-snow avalanche release: experimental evidence from field monitoring
Amelie Fees, Michael Lombardo, Alec van Herwijnen, Peter Lehmann, and Jürg Schweizer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2485,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2485, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Other Hazards (e.g., Glacial and Snow Hazards, Karst, Wildfires Hazards, and Medical Geo-Hazards)
Statistical calibration of probabilistic medium-range Fire Weather Index forecasts in Europe
Stephanie Bohlmann and Marko Laine
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4225–4235, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4225-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4225-2024, 2024
Short summary
Improving fire severity prediction in south-eastern Australia using vegetation-specific information
Kang He, Xinyi Shen, Cory Merow, Efthymios Nikolopoulos, Rachael V. Gallagher, Feifei Yang, and Emmanouil N. Anagnostou
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3337–3355, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3337-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3337-2024, 2024
Short summary
Review article: A scoping review of human factors in avalanche decision-making
Audun Hetland, Rebecca Anne Hetland, Tarjei Tveito Skille, and Andrea Mannberg
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1628,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1628, 2024
Short summary
How hard do avalanche practitioners tap during snow stability tests?
Håvard B. Toft, Samuel V. Verplanck, and Markus Landrø
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2757–2772, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2757-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2757-2024, 2024
Short summary
A large-scale validation of snowpack simulations in support of avalanche forecasting focusing on critical layers
Florian Herla, Pascal Haegeli, Simon Horton, and Patrick Mair
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2727–2756, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2727-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2727-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Alava, M. J., Nukala, P. K. V. V., and Zapperi, S.: Statistical models of fracture, Adv. Phys., 55, 349–476, https://doi.org/10.1080/00018730300741518, 2006. a
Alstott, J., Bullmore, E., and Plenz, D.: powerlaw: a Python package for analysis of heavy-tailed distributions, PLoS ONE, 9, e85777, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085777, 2014. a
Amitrano, D.: Variability in the power-law distributions of rupture events: How and why does b-value change, Eur. Phys. J.-Spec. Top., 205, 199–215, 2012. a, b
Ancey, C. and Bain, V.: Dynamics of glide avalanches and snow gliding, Rev. Geophys., 53, 745–784, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000491, 2015. a
Bak, P.: Complexity and Criticality, in: How Nature Works: the science of self-organized criticality, Springer New York, New York, NY, USA, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5426-1_1, 1996. a
Download
Short summary
Glide-snow avalanches release at the ground–snow interface, and their release process is poorly understood. To investigate the influence of spatial variability (snowpack and basal friction) on avalanche release, we developed a 3D, mechanical, threshold-based model that reproduces an observed release area distribution. A sensitivity analysis showed that the distribution was mostly influenced by the basal friction uniformity, while the variations in snowpack properties had little influence.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint