Articles | Volume 16, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2529-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2529-2016
Research article
 | 
30 Nov 2016
Research article |  | 30 Nov 2016

Analyzing the sensitivity of a flood risk assessment model towards its input data

Hanne Glas, Greet Deruyter, Philippe De Maeyer, Arpita Mandal, and Sherene James-Williamson

Related authors

Global dryland aridity changes indicated by atmospheric, hydrological, and vegetation observations at meteorological stations
Haiyang Shi, Geping Luo, Olaf Hellwich, Xiufeng He, Alishir Kurban, Philippe De Maeyer, and Tim Van de Voorde
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4551–4562, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4551-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4551-2023, 2023
Short summary
The changing role of the map in Western European society over the last 250 years
Philippe De Maeyer
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 6, 49, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-6-49-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-6-49-2023, 2023
Revisiting and attributing the global controls over terrestrial ecosystem functions of climate and plant traits at FLUXNET sites via causal graphical models
Haiyang Shi, Geping Luo, Olaf Hellwich, Alishir Kurban, Philippe De Maeyer, and Tim Van de Voorde
Biogeosciences, 20, 2727–2741, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2727-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2727-2023, 2023
Short summary
AUTOMATED REGISTRATION OF BUILDING SCAN WITH BIM THROUGH DETECTION OF CONGRUENT CORNER POINTS
N. A. Sheik, G. Deruyter, and P. Veelaert
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W3-2022, 179–185, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W3-2022-179-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W3-2022-179-2022, 2022
Evaluation of water flux predictive models developed using eddy-covariance observations and machine learning: a meta-analysis
Haiyang Shi, Geping Luo, Olaf Hellwich, Mingjuan Xie, Chen Zhang, Yu Zhang, Yuangang Wang, Xiuliang Yuan, Xiaofei Ma, Wenqiang Zhang, Alishir Kurban, Philippe De Maeyer, and Tim Van de Voorde
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4603–4618, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4603-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4603-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Risk Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies, Socioeconomic and Management Aspects
The role of response efficacy and self-efficacy in disaster preparedness actions for vulnerable households
Dong Qiu, Binglin Lv, Yuepeng Cui, and Zexiong Zhan
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3789–3803, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3789-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3789-2023, 2023
Short summary
Scientists as storytellers: the explanatory power of stories told about environmental crises
Jenni Barclay, Richie Robertson, and M. Teresa Armijos
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3603–3615, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3603-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3603-2023, 2023
Short summary
Back analysis of a building collapse under snow and rain loads in a Mediterranean area
Isabelle Ousset, Guillaume Evin, Damien Raynaud, and Thierry Faug
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3509–3523, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3509-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3509-2023, 2023
Short summary
Assessment of building damage and risk under extreme flood scenarios in Shanghai
Jiachang Tu, Jiahong Wen, Liang Emlyn Yang, Andrea Reimuth, Stephen S. Young, Min Zhang, Luyang Wang, and Matthias Garschagen
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3247–3260, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3247-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3247-2023, 2023
Short summary
Towards a global impact-based forecasting model for tropical cyclones
Mersedeh Kooshki Forooshani, Marc van den Homberg, Kyriaki Kalimeri, Andreas Kaltenbrunner, Yelena Mejova, Leonardo Milano, Pauline Ndirangu, Daniela Paolotti, Aklilu Teklesadik, and Monica L. Turner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2205,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2205, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Apel, H., Thieken, A. H., Merz, B., and Blöschl, G.: Flood risk assessment and associated uncertainty, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 295–308, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-4-295-2004, 2004.
Apel, H., Merz, B., and Thieken, A. H.: Quantification of uncertainties in flood risk assessments, Int. J. River Basin Manage., 6, 149–162, https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2008.9635344, 2008.
Apel, H., Aronica, G. T., Kreibich, H., and Thiecken, A. H.: Flood risk analyses – How detailed do we need to be?, Nat Hazards, 49, 79–98, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9277-8, 2009.
Carrington, C. D. and Bolger, M. P.: Uncertainty and Risk Assessment, Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess., 4, 253–257, https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039891284325, 1998.
Collier, P., Kirchberger, M., and Söderbom, M.: The Cost of Road Infrastructure in Developing Countries, Oxford, Centre for the Study of African Economies, Department of Economics, 2013.
Download
Short summary
Adequate flood damage assessments can help to minimize damage costs in the SIDS. Data availability is, however, a major issue in these areas. In order to determine the minimal data necessary for an adequate result, a sensitivity analysis was performed on the input data. This has shown that population density, in combination with an average number of people per household, is a good parameter to determine building damage. Furthermore, a complete road dataset is visually indispensable.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint