Articles | Volume 23, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-823-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-823-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
27 Feb 2023
Research article |
| 27 Feb 2023
| 27 Feb 2023
A globally applicable framework for compound flood hazard modeling
Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit
Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Deltares, Delft, the Netherlands
Invited contribution by Dirk Eilander, recipient of the EGU Hydrological Sciences Outstanding Student and PhD candidate Presentation (OSPP) Awards 2022.
Anaïs Couasnon
Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit
Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Tim Leijnse
Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit
Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Deltares, Delft, the Netherlands
Hiroaki Ikeuchi
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Tokyo, Japan
Dai Yamazaki
Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Sanne Muis
Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit
Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Deltares, Delft, the Netherlands
Job Dullaart
Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit
Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Arjen Haag
Deltares, Delft, the Netherlands
Hessel C. Winsemius
Deltares, Delft, the Netherlands
Philip J. Ward
Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit
Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Related authors
Irene Benito, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, Philip J. Ward, Dirk Eilander, and Sanne Muis
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2287–2315, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2287-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2287-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Global flood models are key to the mitigation of coastal flooding impacts, yet they still have limitations when providing actionable insights locally. We present a multiscale framework that couples dynamic water level and flood models and bridges the fully global and local modelling approaches. We apply it to three historical storms. Our findings reveal that the importance of model refinements varies based on the study area characteristics and the storm’s nature.
Huazhi Li, Robert A. Jane, Dirk Eilander, Alejandra R. Enríquez, Toon Haer, and Philip J. Ward
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2993, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2993, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Short summary
We assess the likelihood of widespread compound flooding along the U.S. coastline. Using a large set of generated plausible events preserving observed dependence, we find that nearly half of compound floods on the West coast affect multiple sites. Such events are rarer on the East coast while most compound events affect single sites on the Gulf coast. Our results underscore the importance of including spatial dependence in compound flood risk assessment and can help in better risk management.
Lucas Terlinden-Ruhl, Anaïs Couasnon, Dirk Eilander, Gijs G. Hendrickx, Patricia Mares-Nasarre, and José A. Á. Antolínez
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1353–1375, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1353-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1353-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study develops a conceptual framework that uses active learning to accelerate compound flood risk assessments. A case study of Charleston County shows that the framework achieves faster and more accurate risk quantification compared to the state-of-the-art. This win–win allows for an increase in the number of flooding parameters, which results in an 11.6 % difference in the expected annual damages. Therefore, this framework allows for more comprehensive compound flood risk assessments.
Joshua Green, Ivan D. Haigh, Niall Quinn, Jeff Neal, Thomas Wahl, Melissa Wood, Dirk Eilander, Marleen de Ruiter, Philip Ward, and Paula Camus
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 747–816, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-747-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-747-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Compound flooding, involving the combination or successive occurrence of two or more flood drivers, can amplify flood impacts in coastal/estuarine regions. This paper reviews the practices, trends, methodologies, applications, and findings of coastal compound flooding literature at regional to global scales. We explore the types of compound flood events, their mechanistic processes, and the range of terminology. Lastly, this review highlights knowledge gaps and implications for future practices.
Willem J. van Verseveld, Albrecht H. Weerts, Martijn Visser, Joost Buitink, Ruben O. Imhoff, Hélène Boisgontier, Laurène Bouaziz, Dirk Eilander, Mark Hegnauer, Corine ten Velden, and Bobby Russell
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3199–3234, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3199-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3199-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present the wflow_sbm distributed hydrological model, recently released by Deltares, as part of the Wflow.jl open-source modelling framework in the programming language Julia. Wflow_sbm has a fast runtime, making it suitable for large-scale modelling. Wflow_sbm models can be set a priori for any catchment with the Python tool HydroMT-Wflow based on globally available datasets, which results in satisfactory to good performance (without much tuning). We show this for a number of specific cases.
Eric Mortensen, Timothy Tiggeloven, Toon Haer, Bas van Bemmel, Dewi Le Bars, Sanne Muis, Dirk Eilander, Frederiek Sperna Weiland, Arno Bouwman, Willem Ligtvoet, and Philip J. Ward
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1381–1400, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1381-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1381-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Current levels of coastal flood risk are projected to increase in coming decades due to various reasons, e.g. sea-level rise, land subsidence, and coastal urbanization: action is needed to minimize this future risk. We evaluate dykes and coastal levees, foreshore vegetation, zoning restrictions, and dry-proofing on a global scale to estimate what levels of risk reductions are possible. We demonstrate that there are several potential adaptation pathways forward for certain areas of the world.
Dirk Eilander, Anaïs Couasnon, Frederiek C. Sperna Weiland, Willem Ligtvoet, Arno Bouwman, Hessel C. Winsemius, and Philip J. Ward
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2251–2272, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2251-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2251-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a framework for assessing compound flood risk using hydrodynamic, impact, and statistical modeling. A pilot in Mozambique shows the importance of accounting for compound events in risk assessments. We also show how the framework can be used to assess the effectiveness of different risk reduction measures. As the framework is based on global datasets and is largely automated, it can easily be applied in other areas for first-order assessments of compound flood risk.
Job C. M. Dullaart, Sanne Muis, Hans de Moel, Philip J. Ward, Dirk Eilander, and Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1847–1862, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1847-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1847-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Coastal flooding is driven by storm surges and high tides and can be devastating. To gain an understanding of the threat posed by coastal flooding and to identify areas that are especially at risk, now and in the future, it is crucial to accurately model coastal inundation and assess the coastal flood hazard. Here, we present a global dataset with hydrographs that represent the typical evolution of an extreme sea level. These can be used to model coastal inundation more accurately.
Dirk Eilander, Willem van Verseveld, Dai Yamazaki, Albrecht Weerts, Hessel C. Winsemius, and Philip J. Ward
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5287–5313, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5287-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5287-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Digital elevation models and derived flow directions are crucial to distributed hydrological modeling. As the spatial resolution of models is typically coarser than these data, we need methods to upscale flow direction data while preserving the river structure. We propose the Iterative Hydrography Upscaling (IHU) method and show it outperforms other often-applied methods. We publish the multi-resolution MERIT Hydro IHU hydrography dataset and the algorithm as part of the pyflwdir Python package.
Jerom P. M. Aerts, Steffi Uhlemann-Elmer, Dirk Eilander, and Philip J. Ward
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3245–3260, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3245-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3245-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We compare and analyse flood hazard maps from eight global flood models that represent the current state of the global flood modelling community. We apply our comparison to China as a case study, and for the first time, we include industry models, pluvial flooding, and flood protection standards. We find substantial variability between the flood hazard maps in the modelled inundated area and exposed gross domestic product (GDP) across multiple return periods and in expected annual exposed GDP.
Wiebke S. Jäger, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Timothy Tiggeloven, and Philip J. Ward
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2751–2769, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2751-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2751-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Multiple hazards, occurring simultaneously or consecutively, can have more extreme impacts than single hazards. We examined the disaster records in the global emergency events database EM-DAT to better understand this phenomenon. We developed a method to identify such multi-hazards and analysed their reported impacts using statistics. Multi-hazards have accounted for a disproportionate number of the impacts, but there appear to be different archetypal patterns in which the impacts compound.
Lou Brett, Christopher J. White, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Bart van den Hurk, Philip Ward, and Jakob Zscheischler
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2591–2611, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2591-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2591-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Compound events, where multiple weather or climate hazards occur together, pose significant risks to both society and the environment. These events, like simultaneous wind and rain, can have more severe impacts than single hazards. Our review of compound event research from 2012–2022 reveals a rise in studies, especially on events that occur concurrently, hot and dry events, and compounding flooding. The review also highlights opportunities for research in the coming years.
Timothy Tiggeloven, Colin Raymond, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Jana Sillmann, Annegret H. Thieken, Sophie L. Buijs, Roxana Ciurean, Emma Cordier, Julia M. Crummy, Lydia Cumiskey, Kelley De Polt, Melanie Duncan, Davide M. Ferrario, Wiebke S. Jäger, Elco E. Koks, Nicole van Maanen, Heather J. Murdock, Jaroslav Mysiak, Sadhana Nirandjan, Benjamin Poschlod, Peter Priesmeier, Nivedita Sairam, Pia-Johanna Schweizer, Tristian R. Stolte, Marie-Luise Zenker, James E. Daniell, Alexander Fekete, Christian M. Geiß, Marc J. C. van den Homberg, Sirkku K. Juhola, Christian Kuhlicke, Karen Lebek, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Stefan Schneiderbauer, Silvia Torresan, Cees J. van Westen, Judith N. Claassen, Bijan Khazai, Virginia Murray, Julius Schlumberger, and Philip J. Ward
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2771, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2771, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscience Communication (GC).
Short summary
Short summary
Natural hazards like floods, earthquakes, and landslides are often interconnected which may create bigger problems than when they occur alone. We studied expert discussions from an international conference to understand how scientists and policymakers can better prepare for these multi-hazards and use new technologies to protect its communities while contributing to dialogues about future international agreements beyond the Sendai Framework and supporting global sustainability goals.
Nicole van Maanen, Marleen de Ruiter, Wiebke Jäger, Veronica Casartelli, Roxana Ciurean, Noemi Padron, Anne Sophie Daloz, David Geurts, Stefania Gottardo, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler, Abel López Diez, Jaime Díaz Pacheco, Pedro Dorta Antequera, Tamara Febles Arévalo, Sara García González, Raúl Hernández-Martín, Carmen Alvarez-Albelo, Juan José Diaz-Hernandez, Lin Ma, Letizia Monteleone, Karina Reiter, Tristian Stolte, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Silvia Torresan, Sharon Tatman, David Romero Manrique de Lara, Yeray Hernández González, and Philip J. Ward
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3075, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3075, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).
Short summary
Short summary
Disaster risk management faces growing challenges from multiple, changing hazards. Interviews with stakeholders in five European regions reveal that climate change, urban growth, and socio-economic shifts increase vulnerability and exposure. Measures to reduce one risk can worsen others, highlighting the need for better coordination. The study calls for flexible, context-specific strategies that connect scientific risk assessments with real-world decision-making.
Irene Benito, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, Philip J. Ward, Dirk Eilander, and Sanne Muis
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2287–2315, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2287-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2287-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Global flood models are key to the mitigation of coastal flooding impacts, yet they still have limitations when providing actionable insights locally. We present a multiscale framework that couples dynamic water level and flood models and bridges the fully global and local modelling approaches. We apply it to three historical storms. Our findings reveal that the importance of model refinements varies based on the study area characteristics and the storm’s nature.
Huazhi Li, Robert A. Jane, Dirk Eilander, Alejandra R. Enríquez, Toon Haer, and Philip J. Ward
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2993, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2993, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Short summary
We assess the likelihood of widespread compound flooding along the U.S. coastline. Using a large set of generated plausible events preserving observed dependence, we find that nearly half of compound floods on the West coast affect multiple sites. Such events are rarer on the East coast while most compound events affect single sites on the Gulf coast. Our results underscore the importance of including spatial dependence in compound flood risk assessment and can help in better risk management.
Nicole van Maanen, Joël J.-F. G. De Plaen, Timothy Tiggeloven, Maria Luisa Colmenares, Philip J. Ward, Paolo Scussolini, and Elco Koks
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2075–2080, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2075-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2075-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding coastal flood protection is vital for assessing risks from natural disasters and climate change. However, current global data on coastal flood protection are limited and based on simplified assumptions, leading to potential uncertainties in risk estimates. As a step in this direction, we propose a comprehensive dataset, COASTtal flood PROtection Standards within EUrope (COASTPROS-EU), which compiles coastal flood protection standards in Europe.
Bernhard Lehner, Mira Anand, Etienne Fluet-Chouinard, Florence Tan, Filipe Aires, George H. Allen, Philippe Bousquet, Josep G. Canadell, Nick Davidson, Meng Ding, C. Max Finlayson, Thomas Gumbricht, Lammert Hilarides, Gustaf Hugelius, Robert B. Jackson, Maartje C. Korver, Liangyun Liu, Peter B. McIntyre, Szabolcs Nagy, David Olefeldt, Tamlin M. Pavelsky, Jean-Francois Pekel, Benjamin Poulter, Catherine Prigent, Jida Wang, Thomas A. Worthington, Dai Yamazaki, Xiao Zhang, and Michele Thieme
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 2277–2329, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2277-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2277-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Lakes and Wetlands Database (GLWD) version 2 distinguishes a total of 33 non-overlapping wetland classes, providing a static map of the world’s inland surface waters. It contains cell fractions of wetland extents per class at a grid cell resolution of ~500 m. The total combined extent of all classes including all inland and coastal waterbodies and wetlands of all inundation frequencies – that is, the maximum extent – covers 18.2 × 106 km2, equivalent to 13.4 % of total global land area.
Lucas Terlinden-Ruhl, Anaïs Couasnon, Dirk Eilander, Gijs G. Hendrickx, Patricia Mares-Nasarre, and José A. Á. Antolínez
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1353–1375, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1353-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1353-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study develops a conceptual framework that uses active learning to accelerate compound flood risk assessments. A case study of Charleston County shows that the framework achieves faster and more accurate risk quantification compared to the state-of-the-art. This win–win allows for an increase in the number of flooding parameters, which results in an 11.6 % difference in the expected annual damages. Therefore, this framework allows for more comprehensive compound flood risk assessments.
Julius Schlumberger, Tristian Stolte, Helena Margaret Garcia, Antonia Sebastian, Wiebke Jäger, Philip Ward, Marleen de Ruiter, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Annegien Tijssen, and Mariana Madruga de Brito
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-850, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-850, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The risk flood of flood impacts is dynamic as society continuously responds to specific events or ongoing developments. We analyzed 28 studies that assess such dynamics of vulnerability. Most research uses surveys and basic statistics data, while integrated, flexible models are seldom used. The studies struggle to link specific events or developments to the observed changes. Our findings highlight needs and possible directions towards a better assessment of vulnerability dynamics.
Joshua Green, Ivan D. Haigh, Niall Quinn, Jeff Neal, Thomas Wahl, Melissa Wood, Dirk Eilander, Marleen de Ruiter, Philip Ward, and Paula Camus
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 747–816, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-747-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-747-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Compound flooding, involving the combination or successive occurrence of two or more flood drivers, can amplify flood impacts in coastal/estuarine regions. This paper reviews the practices, trends, methodologies, applications, and findings of coastal compound flooding literature at regional to global scales. We explore the types of compound flood events, their mechanistic processes, and the range of terminology. Lastly, this review highlights knowledge gaps and implications for future practices.
Maarten van Ormondt, Tim Leijnse, Roel de Goede, Kees Nederhoff, and Ap van Dongeren
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 843–861, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-843-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-843-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate flood risk assessments are crucial for storm protection. To achieve efficiency, computational costs must be minimized. This paper introduces a novel subgrid approach for linear inertial equations (LIEs) with bed level and friction variations, implemented in the Super-Fast INundation of CoastS (SFINCS) model. Pre-processed lookup tables enhance simulation precision with lower costs. Validations show significant accuracy improvement even at coarser resolutions.
Sadhana Nirandjan, Elco E. Koks, Mengqi Ye, Raghav Pant, Kees C. H. Van Ginkel, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, and Philip J. Ward
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4341–4368, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4341-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4341-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Critical infrastructures (CIs) are exposed to natural hazards, which may result in significant damage and burden society. Vulnerability is a key determinant for reducing these risks, yet crucial information is scattered in the literature. Our study reviews over 1510 fragility and vulnerability curves for CI assets, creating a unique publicly available physical vulnerability database that can be directly used for hazard risk assessments, including floods, earthquakes, windstorms, and landslides.
Christopher J. White, Mohammed Sarfaraz Gani Adnan, Marcello Arosio, Stephanie Buller, YoungHwa Cha, Roxana Ciurean, Julia M. Crummy, Melanie Duncan, Joel Gill, Claire Kennedy, Elisa Nobile, Lara Smale, and Philip J. Ward
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-178, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-178, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for NHESS
Short summary
Short summary
Indicators contain observable and measurable characteristics to understand the state of a concept or phenomenon and/or monitor it over time. There have been limited efforts to understand how indicators are being used in multi-hazard and multi-risk contexts. We find most of existing indicators do not include the interactions between hazards or risks. We propose 12 recommendations to enable the development and uptake of multi-hazard and multi-risk indicators.
Thomas P. Collings, Niall D. Quinn, Ivan D. Haigh, Joshua Green, Izzy Probyn, Hamish Wilkinson, Sanne Muis, William V. Sweet, and Paul D. Bates
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2403–2423, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2403-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2403-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Coastal areas are at risk of flooding from rising sea levels and extreme weather events. This study applies a new approach to estimating the likelihood of coastal flooding around the world. The method uses data from observations and computer models to create a detailed map of where these coastal floods might occur. The approach can predict flooding in areas for which there are few or no data available. The results can be used to help prepare for and prevent this type of flooding.
Yuki Kimura, Yukiko Hirabayashi, and Dai Yamazaki
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.170365204.46854879/v1, https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.170365204.46854879/v1, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
The limited number of ensemble members causes uncertainty in future climate predictions. To address this, using multiple simulations under a single future climate scenario can increase the sample size, but data availability is limited in the scenario-based future projection experiment of climate model intercomparison projects. Our proposed method integrates multiple climate scenarios at specific temperature increases, effectively reducing uncertainty in future flood hazard assessments globally.
Willem J. van Verseveld, Albrecht H. Weerts, Martijn Visser, Joost Buitink, Ruben O. Imhoff, Hélène Boisgontier, Laurène Bouaziz, Dirk Eilander, Mark Hegnauer, Corine ten Velden, and Bobby Russell
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3199–3234, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3199-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3199-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present the wflow_sbm distributed hydrological model, recently released by Deltares, as part of the Wflow.jl open-source modelling framework in the programming language Julia. Wflow_sbm has a fast runtime, making it suitable for large-scale modelling. Wflow_sbm models can be set a priori for any catchment with the Python tool HydroMT-Wflow based on globally available datasets, which results in satisfactory to good performance (without much tuning). We show this for a number of specific cases.
Eric Mortensen, Timothy Tiggeloven, Toon Haer, Bas van Bemmel, Dewi Le Bars, Sanne Muis, Dirk Eilander, Frederiek Sperna Weiland, Arno Bouwman, Willem Ligtvoet, and Philip J. Ward
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1381–1400, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1381-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1381-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Current levels of coastal flood risk are projected to increase in coming decades due to various reasons, e.g. sea-level rise, land subsidence, and coastal urbanization: action is needed to minimize this future risk. We evaluate dykes and coastal levees, foreshore vegetation, zoning restrictions, and dry-proofing on a global scale to estimate what levels of risk reductions are possible. We demonstrate that there are several potential adaptation pathways forward for certain areas of the world.
Kees Nederhoff, Maarten van Ormondt, Jay Veeramony, Ap van Dongeren, José Antonio Álvarez Antolínez, Tim Leijnse, and Dano Roelvink
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1789–1811, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1789-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1789-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Forecasting tropical cyclones and their flooding impact is challenging. Our research introduces the Tropical Cyclone Forecasting Framework (TC-FF), enhancing cyclone predictions despite uncertainties. TC-FF generates global wind and flood scenarios, valuable even in data-limited regions. Applied to cases like Cyclone Idai, it showcases potential in bettering disaster preparation, marking progress in handling cyclone threats.
Simon Treu, Sanne Muis, Sönke Dangendorf, Thomas Wahl, Julius Oelsmann, Stefanie Heinicke, Katja Frieler, and Matthias Mengel
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 1121–1136, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1121-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1121-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This article describes a reconstruction of monthly coastal water levels from 1900–2015 and hourly data from 1979–2015, both with and without long-term sea level rise. The dataset is based on a combination of three datasets that are focused on different aspects of coastal water levels. Comparison with tide gauge records shows that this combination brings reconstructions closer to the observations compared to the individual datasets.
Menaka Revel, Xudong Zhou, Prakat Modi, Jean-François Cretaux, Stephane Calmant, and Dai Yamazaki
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 75–88, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-75-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-75-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
As satellite technology advances, there is an incredible amount of remotely sensed data for observing terrestrial water. Satellite altimetry observations of water heights can be utilized to calibrate and validate large-scale hydrodynamic models. However, because large-scale models are discontinuous, comparing satellite altimetry to predicted water surface elevation is difficult. We developed a satellite altimetry mapping procedure for high-resolution river network data.
Hubert T. Samboko, Sten Schurer, Hubert H. G. Savenije, Hodson Makurira, Kawawa Banda, and Hessel Winsemius
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 12, 155–169, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-155-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-155-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The study investigates how low-cost technology can be applied in data-scarce catchments to improve water resource management. More specifically, we investigate how drone technology can be combined with low-cost real-time kinematic positioning (RTK) global navigation satellite system (GNSS) equipment and subsequently applied to a 3D hydraulic model so as to generate more physically based rating curves.
Md Safat Sikder, Jida Wang, George H. Allen, Yongwei Sheng, Dai Yamazaki, Chunqiao Song, Meng Ding, Jean-François Crétaux, and Tamlin M. Pavelsky
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3483–3511, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3483-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3483-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce Lake-TopoCat to reveal detailed lake hydrography information. It contains the location of lake outlets, the boundary of lake catchments, and a wide suite of attributes that depict detailed lake drainage relationships. It was constructed using lake boundaries from a global lake dataset, with the help of high-resolution hydrography data. This database may facilitate a variety of applications including water quality, agriculture and fisheries, and integrated lake–river modeling.
Youjiang Shen, Karina Nielsen, Menaka Revel, Dedi Liu, and Dai Yamazaki
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2781–2808, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2781-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2781-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Res-CN fills a gap in a comprehensive and extensive dataset of reservoir-catchment characteristics for 3254 Chinese reservoirs with 512 catchment-level attributes and significantly enhanced spatial and temporal coverage (e.g., 67 % increase in water level and 225 % in storage anomaly) of time series of reservoir water level (data available for 20 % of 3254 reservoirs), water area (99 %), storage anomaly (92 %), and evaporation (98 %), supporting a wide range of applications and disciplines.
Dirk Eilander, Anaïs Couasnon, Frederiek C. Sperna Weiland, Willem Ligtvoet, Arno Bouwman, Hessel C. Winsemius, and Philip J. Ward
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2251–2272, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2251-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2251-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a framework for assessing compound flood risk using hydrodynamic, impact, and statistical modeling. A pilot in Mozambique shows the importance of accounting for compound events in risk assessments. We also show how the framework can be used to assess the effectiveness of different risk reduction measures. As the framework is based on global datasets and is largely automated, it can easily be applied in other areas for first-order assessments of compound flood risk.
Job C. M. Dullaart, Sanne Muis, Hans de Moel, Philip J. Ward, Dirk Eilander, and Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1847–1862, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1847-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1847-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Coastal flooding is driven by storm surges and high tides and can be devastating. To gain an understanding of the threat posed by coastal flooding and to identify areas that are especially at risk, now and in the future, it is crucial to accurately model coastal inundation and assess the coastal flood hazard. Here, we present a global dataset with hydrographs that represent the typical evolution of an extreme sea level. These can be used to model coastal inundation more accurately.
Heidi Kreibich, Kai Schröter, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Anne F. Van Loon, Maurizio Mazzoleni, Guta Wakbulcho Abeshu, Svetlana Agafonova, Amir AghaKouchak, Hafzullah Aksoy, Camila Alvarez-Garreton, Blanca Aznar, Laila Balkhi, Marlies H. Barendrecht, Sylvain Biancamaria, Liduin Bos-Burgering, Chris Bradley, Yus Budiyono, Wouter Buytaert, Lucinda Capewell, Hayley Carlson, Yonca Cavus, Anaïs Couasnon, Gemma Coxon, Ioannis Daliakopoulos, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Claire Delus, Mathilde Erfurt, Giuseppe Esposito, Didier François, Frédéric Frappart, Jim Freer, Natalia Frolova, Animesh K. Gain, Manolis Grillakis, Jordi Oriol Grima, Diego A. Guzmán, Laurie S. Huning, Monica Ionita, Maxim Kharlamov, Dao Nguyen Khoi, Natalie Kieboom, Maria Kireeva, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Waldo Lavado-Casimiro, Hong-Yi Li, Maria Carmen LLasat, David Macdonald, Johanna Mård, Hannah Mathew-Richards, Andrew McKenzie, Alfonso Mejia, Eduardo Mario Mendiondo, Marjolein Mens, Shifteh Mobini, Guilherme Samprogna Mohor, Viorica Nagavciuc, Thanh Ngo-Duc, Huynh Thi Thao Nguyen, Pham Thi Thao Nhi, Olga Petrucci, Nguyen Hong Quan, Pere Quintana-Seguí, Saman Razavi, Elena Ridolfi, Jannik Riegel, Md Shibly Sadik, Nivedita Sairam, Elisa Savelli, Alexey Sazonov, Sanjib Sharma, Johanna Sörensen, Felipe Augusto Arguello Souza, Kerstin Stahl, Max Steinhausen, Michael Stoelzle, Wiwiana Szalińska, Qiuhong Tang, Fuqiang Tian, Tamara Tokarczyk, Carolina Tovar, Thi Van Thu Tran, Marjolein H. J. van Huijgevoort, Michelle T. H. van Vliet, Sergiy Vorogushyn, Thorsten Wagener, Yueling Wang, Doris E. Wendt, Elliot Wickham, Long Yang, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini, and Philip J. Ward
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2009–2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2009-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2009-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
As the adverse impacts of hydrological extremes increase in many regions of the world, a better understanding of the drivers of changes in risk and impacts is essential for effective flood and drought risk management. We present a dataset containing data of paired events, i.e. two floods or two droughts that occurred in the same area. The dataset enables comparative analyses and allows detailed context-specific assessments. Additionally, it supports the testing of socio-hydrological models.
Yuki Kimura, Yukiko Hirabayashi, Yuki Kita, Xudong Zhou, and Dai Yamazaki
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1627–1644, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1627-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1627-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Since both the frequency and magnitude of flood will increase by climate change, information on spatial distributions of potential inundation depths (i.e., flood-hazard map) is required. We developed a method for constructing realistic future flood-hazard maps which addresses issues due to biases in climate models. A larger population is estimated to face risk in the future flood-hazard map, suggesting that only focusing on flood-frequency change could cause underestimation of future risk.
Menaka Revel, Xudong Zhou, Dai Yamazaki, and Shinjiro Kanae
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 647–671, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-647-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-647-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The capacity to discern surface water improved as satellites became more available. Because remote sensing data is discontinuous, integrating models with satellite observations will improve knowledge of water resources. However, given the current limitations (e.g., parameter errors) of water resource modeling, merging satellite data with simulations is problematic. Integrating observations and models with the unique approaches given here can lead to a better estimation of surface water dynamics.
Paolo Scussolini, Job Dullaart, Sanne Muis, Alessio Rovere, Pepijn Bakker, Dim Coumou, Hans Renssen, Philip J. Ward, and Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
Clim. Past, 19, 141–157, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-141-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-141-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We reconstruct sea level extremes due to storm surges in a past warmer climate. We employ a novel combination of paleoclimate modeling and global ocean hydrodynamic modeling. We find that during the Last Interglacial, about 127 000 years ago, seasonal sea level extremes were indeed significantly different – higher or lower – on long stretches of the global coast. These changes are associated with different patterns of atmospheric storminess linked with meridional shifts in wind bands.
Robert J. Parker, Chris Wilson, Edward Comyn-Platt, Garry Hayman, Toby R. Marthews, A. Anthony Bloom, Mark F. Lunt, Nicola Gedney, Simon J. Dadson, Joe McNorton, Neil Humpage, Hartmut Boesch, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Paul I. Palmer, and Dai Yamazaki
Biogeosciences, 19, 5779–5805, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5779-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5779-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Wetlands are the largest natural source of methane, one of the most important climate gases. The JULES land surface model simulates these emissions. We use satellite data to evaluate how well JULES reproduces the methane seasonal cycle over different tropical wetlands. It performs well for most regions; however, it struggles for some African wetlands influenced heavily by river flooding. We explain the reasons for these deficiencies and highlight how future development will improve these areas.
Mariana C. A. Clare, Tim W. B. Leijnse, Robert T. McCall, Ferdinand L. M. Diermanse, Colin J. Cotter, and Matthew D. Piggott
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2491–2515, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2491-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2491-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Assessing uncertainty is computationally expensive because it requires multiple runs of expensive models. We take the novel approach of assessing uncertainty from coastal flooding using a multilevel multifidelity (MLMF) method which combines the efficiency of less accurate models with the accuracy of more expensive models at different resolutions. This significantly reduces the computational cost but maintains accuracy, making previously unfeasible real-world studies possible.
Toby R. Marthews, Simon J. Dadson, Douglas B. Clark, Eleanor M. Blyth, Garry D. Hayman, Dai Yamazaki, Olivia R. E. Becher, Alberto Martínez-de la Torre, Catherine Prigent, and Carlos Jiménez
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3151–3175, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3151-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3151-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Reliable data on global inundated areas remain uncertain. By matching a leading global data product on inundation extents (GIEMS) against predictions from a global hydrodynamic model (CaMa-Flood), we found small but consistent and non-random biases in well-known tropical wetlands (Sudd, Pantanal, Amazon and Congo). These result from known limitations in the data and the models used, which shows us how to improve our ability to make critical predictions of inundation events in the future.
Tim Willem Bart Leijnse, Alessio Giardino, Kees Nederhoff, and Sofia Caires
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1863–1891, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1863-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1863-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Deriving reliable estimates of design conditions resulting from tropical cyclones is a challenge of high relevance to coastal engineering. Here, having few historical observations is overcome by using the Tropical Cyclone Wind Statistical Estimation Tool (TCWiSE) to create thousands of synthetic realizations, representative of 1000 years of tropical cyclone activity for the Bay of Bengal. The use of synthetic tracks is shown to provide more reliable wind speed, storm surge and wave estimates.
Weihua Zhu, Kai Liu, Ming Wang, Philip J. Ward, and Elco E. Koks
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1519–1540, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1519-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1519-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present a simulation framework to analyse the system vulnerability and risk of the Chinese railway system to floods. To do so, we develop a method for generating flood events at both the national and river basin scale. Results show flood system vulnerability and risk of the railway system are spatially heterogeneous. The event-based approach shows how we can identify critical hotspots, taking the first steps in developing climate-resilient infrastructure.
Philip J. Ward, James Daniell, Melanie Duncan, Anna Dunne, Cédric Hananel, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler, Annegien Tijssen, Silvia Torresan, Roxana Ciurean, Joel C. Gill, Jana Sillmann, Anaïs Couasnon, Elco Koks, Noemi Padrón-Fumero, Sharon Tatman, Marianne Tronstad Lund, Adewole Adesiyun, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, Alexander Alabaster, Bernard Bulder, Carlos Campillo Torres, Andrea Critto, Raúl Hernández-Martín, Marta Machado, Jaroslav Mysiak, Rene Orth, Irene Palomino Antolín, Eva-Cristina Petrescu, Markus Reichstein, Timothy Tiggeloven, Anne F. Van Loon, Hung Vuong Pham, and Marleen C. de Ruiter
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1487–1497, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1487-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1487-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The majority of natural-hazard risk research focuses on single hazards (a flood, a drought, a volcanic eruption, an earthquake, etc.). In the international research and policy community it is recognised that risk management could benefit from a more systemic approach. In this perspective paper, we argue for an approach that addresses multi-hazard, multi-risk management through the lens of sustainability challenges that cut across sectors, regions, and hazards.
Hubert T. Samboko, Sten Schurer, Hubert H. G. Savenije, Hodson Makurira, Kawawa Banda, and Hessel Winsemius
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 11, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-1-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The study was conducted along the Luangwa River in Zambia. It combines low-cost instruments such as UAVs and GPS kits to collect data for the purposes of water management. A novel technique which seamlessly merges the dry and wet bathymetry before application in a hydraulic model was applied. Successful implementation resulted in water authorities with small budgets being able to monitor flows safely and efficiently without significant compromise on accuracy.
Lucas Wouters, Anaïs Couasnon, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Marc J. C. van den Homberg, Aklilu Teklesadik, and Hans de Moel
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3199–3218, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3199-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3199-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This research introduces a novel approach to estimate flood damage in Malawi by applying a machine learning model to UAV imagery. We think that the development of such a model is an essential step to enable the swift allocation of resources for recovery by humanitarian decision-makers. By comparing this method (EUR 10 140) to a conventional land-use-based approach (EUR 15 782) for a specific flood event, recommendations are made for future assessments.
Dirk Eilander, Willem van Verseveld, Dai Yamazaki, Albrecht Weerts, Hessel C. Winsemius, and Philip J. Ward
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5287–5313, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5287-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5287-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Digital elevation models and derived flow directions are crucial to distributed hydrological modeling. As the spatial resolution of models is typically coarser than these data, we need methods to upscale flow direction data while preserving the river structure. We propose the Iterative Hydrography Upscaling (IHU) method and show it outperforms other often-applied methods. We publish the multi-resolution MERIT Hydro IHU hydrography dataset and the algorithm as part of the pyflwdir Python package.
Daisuke Tokuda, Hyungjun Kim, Dai Yamazaki, and Taikan Oki
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5669–5693, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5669-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5669-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We developed TCHOIR, a hydrologic simulation framework, to solve fluvial- and thermodynamics of the river–lake continuum. This provides an algorithm for upscaling high-resolution topography as well, which enables the representation of those interactions at the global scale. Validation against in situ and satellite observations shows that the coupled mode outperforms river- or lake-only modes. TCHOIR will contribute to elucidating the role of surface hydrology in Earth’s energy and water cycle.
Marleen Carolijn de Ruiter, Anaïs Couasnon, and Philip James Ward
Geosci. Commun., 4, 383–397, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-383-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-383-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Many countries can get hit by different hazards, such as earthquakes and floods. Generally, measures and policies are aimed at decreasing the potential damages of one particular hazard type despite their potential of having unwanted effects on other hazard types. We designed a serious game that helps professionals to improve their understanding of these potential negative effects of measures and policies that reduce the impacts of disasters across many different hazard types.
Xudong Zhou, Wenchao Ma, Wataru Echizenya, and Dai Yamazaki
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1071–1085, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1071-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1071-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This article assesses different uncertainties in the analysis of flood risk and found the runoff generated before the river routing is the primary uncertainty source. This calls for attention to be focused on selecting an appropriate runoff for the flood analysis. The uncertainties are reflected in the flood water depth, inundation area and the exposure of the population and economy to the floods.
Kees Nederhoff, Jasper Hoek, Tim Leijnse, Maarten van Ormondt, Sofia Caires, and Alessio Giardino
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 861–878, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-861-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-861-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The design of coastal protection affected by tropical cyclones is often based solely on the analysis of historical tropical cyclones (TCs). The simulation of numerous synthetic TC tracks based on historical data can overcome this limitation. In this paper, a new method for the generation of synthetic TC tracks is proposed, called the Tropical Cyclone Wind Statistical Estimation Tool (TCWiSE). TCWiSE can simulate thousands of tracks and wind fields in any oceanic basin based on any data source.
Jerom P. M. Aerts, Steffi Uhlemann-Elmer, Dirk Eilander, and Philip J. Ward
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3245–3260, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3245-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3245-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We compare and analyse flood hazard maps from eight global flood models that represent the current state of the global flood modelling community. We apply our comparison to China as a case study, and for the first time, we include industry models, pluvial flooding, and flood protection standards. We find substantial variability between the flood hazard maps in the modelled inundated area and exposed gross domestic product (GDP) across multiple return periods and in expected annual exposed GDP.
Cited articles
Aerts, J. P. M., Uhlemann-Elmer, S., Eilander, D., and Ward, P. J.: Comparison of estimates of global flood models for flood hazard and exposed gross domestic product: a China case study, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3245–3260, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3245-2020, 2020.
Alfieri, L., Salamon, P., Bianchi, A., Neal, J. C., Bates, P. D., and Feyen,
L.: Advances in pan-European flood hazard mapping, Hydrol. Process., 28,
4067–4077, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9947, 2014.
Alfieri, L., Bisselink, B., Dottori, F., Naumann, G., de Roo, A., Salamon,
P., Wyser, K., and Feyen, L.: Global projections of river flood risk in a
warmer world, Earth's Future, 5, 171–182,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000485, 2017.
Allen, G. H. and Pavelsky, T. M.: Global extent of rivers and streams,
Science, 361, 585–588, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat0636, 2018.
Andreadis, K. M., Schumann, G. J.-P., and Pavelsky, T. M.: A simple global
river bankfull width and depth database, Water Resour. Res., 49, 7164–7168,
https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20440, 2013.
Andreadis, K. M., Brinkerhoff, C. B., and Gleason, C. J.: Constraining the
assimilation of SWOT observations with hydraulic geometry relations, Water
Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR026611, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019wr026611, 2020.
Athanasiou, P., van Dongeren, A., Giardino, A., Vousdoukas, M., Gaytan-Aguilar, S., and Ranasinghe, R.: Global distribution of nearshore slopes with implications for coastal retreat, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1515–1529, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1515-2019, 2019.
Bakhtyar, R., Maitaria, K., Velissariou, P., Trimble, B., Mashriqui, H.,
Moghimi, S., Abdolali, A., Van der Westhuysen, A. J., Ma, Z., Clark, E. P.,
and Flowers, T.: A new 1D/2D coupled modeling approach for a
riverine-estuarine system under storm events: Application to Delaware river
basin, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2019JE006253,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jc015822, 2020.
Balsamo, G., Beljaars, A., Scipal, K., Viterbo, P., van den Hurk, B.,
Hirschi, M., and Betts, A. K.: A Revised Hydrology for the ECMWF Model:
Verification from Field Site to Terrestrial Water Storage and Impact in the
Integrated Forecast System, J. Hydrometeorol., 10, 623–643,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JHM1068.1, 2009.
Bates, P. D., Horritt, M. S., and Fewtrell, T. J.: A simple inertial
formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional
flood inundation modelling, J. Hydrol., 387, 33–45,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.027, 2010.
Bates, P. D., Quinn, N., Sampson, C., Smith, A., Wing, O., Sosa, J., Savage,
J., Olcese, G., Neal, J., Schumann, G., Giustarini, L., Coxon, G., Porter,
J. R., Amodeo, M. F., Chu, Z., Lewis-Gruss, S., Freeman, N. B., Houser, T.,
Delgado, M., Hamidi, A., Bolliger, I., McCusker, K., Emanuel, K., Ferreira,
C. M., Khalid, A., Haigh, I. D., Couasnon, A., Kopp, R., Hsiang, S., and
Krajewski, W. F.: Combined modeling of US fluvial, pluvial, and coastal
flood hazard under current and future climates, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR028673,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020wr028673, 2021.
Bernhofen, M. V., Whyman, C., Trigg, M. A., Sleigh, A., Smith, A. M.,
Sampson, C., Yamazaki, D., Ward, P. J., Rudari, R., Pappenberger, F.,
Dottori, F., Salamon, P., and Winsemius, H. C.: A first collective
validation of global fluvial flood models for major floods in Nigeria and
Mozambique, Environ. Res. Lett., 417, 257–269,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae014, 2018.
Bevacqua, E., Maraun, D., Vousdoukas, M. I., Voukouvalas, E., Vrac, M.,
Mentaschi, L., and Widmann, M.: Higher probability of compound flooding from
precipitation and storm surge in Europe under anthropogenic climate change,
Sci. Adv., 5, eaaw5531, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw5531, 2019.
Bidlot, J.-R.: Present Status of Wave Forecasting at ECMWF, in: ECMWF Workshop on Ocean Waves, Shinfield Park, ReadingRG2 9AX, UK, 25–27 June 2012, 2012.
Bilskie, M. V. and Hagen, S. C.: Defining flood zone transitions in
low-gradient coastal regions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 2761–2770,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2018gl077524, 2018.
Bowen, A. J., Inman, D. L., and Simmons, V. P.: Wave `set-down' and set-Up,
J. Geophys. Res., 73, 2569–2577, https://doi.org/10.1029/jb073i008p02569,
1968.
Browder, G., Nunez Sanchez, A., Jongman, B., Engle, N., van Beek, E.,
Castera Errea, M., and Hodgson, S.: An EPIC Response : Innovative Governance
for Flood and Drought Risk Management, World Bank, Washington D.C., https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/35754 (last access: 4 February 2023), 2021.
Camus, P., Haigh, I. D., Nasr, A. A., Wahl, T., Darby, S. E., and Nicholls, R. J.: Regional analysis of multivariate compound coastal flooding potential around Europe and environs: sensitivity analysis and spatial patterns, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2021–2040, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2021-2021, 2021.
Couasnon, A., Eilander, D., Muis, S., Veldkamp, T. I. E., Haigh, I. D., Wahl, T., Winsemius, H. C., and Ward, P. J.: Measuring compound flood potential from river discharge and storm surge extremes at the global scale, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 489–504, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-489-2020, 2020.
Deltares: D-Flow Flexible Mesh. Computational Cores and User Interface, User
Manual, Deltares, https://www.deltares.nl/en/software/delft3d-flexible-mesh-suite/ (last access: 4 February 2023), 2022.
Di Baldassarre, G., Schumann, G., and Bates, P. D.: A technique for the
calibration of hydraulic models using uncertain satellite observations of
flood extent, J. Hydrol., 367, 276–282,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.020, 2009.
Donchyts, G., Schellekens, J., Winsemius, H., Eisemann, E., and Van de
Giesen, N.: A 30 m Resolution Surface Water Mask Including Estimation of
Positional and Thematic Differences Using Landsat 8, SRTM and OpenStreetMap:
A Case Study in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia, Remote Sens., 8, 386,
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8050386, 2016.
Dullaart, J. C. M., Muis, S., Bloemendaal, N., and Aerts, J. C. J. H.:
Advancing global storm surge modelling using the new ERA5 climate
reanalysis, Clim. Dynam., 54, 1007–1021,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-05044-0, 2020.
Dullaart, J. C. M., Muis, S., Bloemendaal, N., Chertova, M. V., Couasnon,
A., and Aerts, J. C. J. H.: Accounting for tropical cyclones more than
doubles the global population exposed to low-probability coastal flooding,
Commun. Earth Environ., 2, 1–11,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00204-9, 2021.
Edmonds, D. A., Caldwell, R. L., Brondizio, E. S., and Siani, S. M. O.:
Coastal flooding will disproportionately impact people on river deltas, Nat.
Commun., 11, 4741, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18531-4, 2020.
Eilander, D.: DirkEilander/compound_flood_modelling: revised paper (Version v2), Zenodo [data set, code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7274465, 2022.
Eilander, D. and Boisgontier, H.: hydroMT, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6107669, 2022.
Eilander, D., Couasnon, A., Ikeuchi, H., Muis, S., Yamazaki, D., Winsemius,
H. C., and Ward, P. J.: The effect of surge on riverine flood hazard and
impact in deltas globally, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 104007,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8ca6, 2020.
Eilander, D., Leijnse, T., and Winsemius, H. C.: HydroMT-SFINCS: SFINCS
plugin for HydroMT, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6244556, 2022.
Emerton, R., Cloke, H., Ficchi, A., Hawker, L., de Wit, S., Speight, L.,
Prudhomme, C., Rundell, P., West, R., Neal, J., Cuna, J., Harrigan, S.,
Titley, H., Magnusson, L., Pappenberger, F., Klingaman, N., and Stephens,
E.: Emergency flood bulletins for Cyclones Idai and Kenneth: A critical
evaluation of the use of global flood forecasts for international
humanitarian preparedness and response, Int. J. Disaster
Risk Reduct., 50, 101811, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101811,
2020.
ERCC: Tropical cyclone Idai impact overview, European Commission emergency
response coordination centre (ERCC) DG ECHO daily map, https://reliefweb.int/map/mozambique/tropical-cyclone (last access: 4 February 2023), 2019.
FOSSGIS: Coastline data sets,
https://osmdata.openstreetmap.de/data/coast.html, last access: 15 September 2020.
Garambois, P.-A. and Monnier, J.: Inference of effective river properties
from remotely sensed observations of water surface, Adv. Water Resour., 79,
103–120, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.02.007, 2015.
Gisen, J. I. A. and Savenije, H. H. G.: Estimating bankfull discharge and
depth in ungauged estuaries, Water Resour. Res., 51, 2298–2316,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014wr016227, 2015.
Gori, A., Lin, N., and Smith, J.: Assessing Compound Flooding From
Landfalling Tropical Cyclones on the North Carolina Coast, Water Resour.
Res., 56, e2019WR026788, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026788, 2020a.
Gori, A., Lin, N., and Xi, D.: Tropical cyclone compound flood hazard
assessment: from investigating drivers to quantifying extreme water levels,
Earth's Future, 8, e2020EF001660, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001660,
2020b.
Hall, C. A., Saia, S. M., Popp, A. L., Dogulu, N., Schymanski, S. J., Drost, N., van Emmerik, T., and Hut, R.: A hydrologist's guide to open science, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 647–664, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-647-2022, 2022.
Harrison, L. M., Coulthard, T. J., Robins, P. E., and Lewis, M. J.:
Sensitivity of Estuaries to Compound Flooding, Estuaries Coasts, 45, 1250–1269,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-021-00996-1, 2021.
Hawker, L., Rougier, J., Neal, J. C., Bates, P. D., Archer, L., and
Yamazaki, D.: Implications of Simulating Global Digital Elevation Models for
Flood Inundation Studies, Water Resour. Res., 54, 7910–7928,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023279, 2018a.
Hawker, L., Bates, P. D., Neal, J. C., and Rougier, J.: Perspectives on
Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Simulation for Flood Modeling in the Absence
of a High-Accuracy Open Access Global DEM, Front Earth Sci. Chin., 6,
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00233, 2018b.
Hawker, L., Uhe, P., Paulo, L., Sosa, J., Savage, J., Sampson, C., and Neal,
J.: A 30 m global map of elevation with forests and buildings removed,
Environ. Res. Lett., 17, 024016, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac4d4f,
2022.
Hendry, A., Haigh, I. D., Nicholls, R. J., Winter, H., Neal, R., Wahl, T.,
Joly-Laugel, A., and Darby, S. E.: Assessing the characteristics and drivers
of compound flooding events around the UK coast, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.,
23, 3117–3139, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3117-2019, 2019.
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A.,
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D.,
Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P.,
Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D.,
Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer,
A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková,
M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay,
P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5
global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803, 2020.
Hinkel, J., Feyen, L., Hemer, M., Cozannet, G., Lincke, D., Marcos, M.,
Mentaschi, L., Merkens, J. L., Moel, H., Muis, S., Nicholls, R. J.,
Vafeidis, A. T., Wal, R. S. W., Vousdoukas, M. I., Wahl, T., Ward, P. J.,
and Wolff, C.: Uncertainty and bias in global to regional scale assessments
of current and future coastal flood risk, Earths Future, 9, e2020EF001882,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020ef001882, 2021.
Hirabayashi, Y., Alifu, H., Yamazaki, D., Imada, Y., Shiogama, H., and
Kimura, Y.: Anthropogenic climate change has changed frequency of past flood
during 2010–2013, Prog. Earth Planet. Sci., 8, 1–9,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-021-00431-w, 2021.
Hoch, J. M. and Trigg, M. A.: Advancing global flood hazard simulations by
improving comparability, benchmarking, and integration of global flood
models, Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 034001,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf3d3, 2019.
Hoch, J. M., Eilander, D., Ikeuchi, H., Baart, F., and Winsemius, H. C.: Evaluating the impact of model complexity on flood wave propagation and inundation extent with a hydrologic–hydrodynamic model coupling framework, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1723–1735, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-1723-2019, 2019.
Holland, G. J.: An Analytic Model of the Wind and Pressure Profiles in
Hurricanes, Mon. Weather Rev., 108, 1212–1218,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108<1212:AAMOTW>2.0.CO;2, 1980.
Horritt, M. S. and Bates, P. D.: Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models
for predicting river flood inundation, J. Hydrol., 268, 87–99,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00121-X, 2002.
Ikeuchi, H., Hirabayashi, Y., Yamazaki, D., Kiguchi, M., Koirala, S.,
Nagano, T., Kotera, A., and Kanae, S.: Modeling complex flow dynamics of
fluvial floods exacerbated by sea level rise in the
Ganges–Brahmaputra–Meghna Delta, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 124011,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/124011, 2015.
Ikeuchi, H., Hirabayashi, Y., Yamazaki, D., Muis, S., Ward, P. J.,
Winsemius, H. C., Verlaan, M., and Kanae, S.: Compound simulation of fluvial
floods and storm surges in a global coupled river-coast flood model: Model
development and its application to 2007 Cyclone Sidr in Bangladesh, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Syst., 9, 1847–1862, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017ms000943,
2017.
Irazoqui Apecechea, M., Verlaan, M., Zijl, F., Le Coz, C., and Kernkamp, H.:
Effects of self-attraction and loading at a regional scale: a test case for
the Northwest European Shelf, Ocean Dynam., 67, 729–749,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-017-1053-4, 2017.
Kernkamp, H. W. J., Van Dam, A., Stelling, G. S., and de Goede, E. D.:
Efficient scheme for the shallow water equations on unstructured grids with
application to the Continental Shelf, Ocean Dynam., 61, 1175–1188,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-011-0423-6, 2011.
Knapp, K. R., Kruk, M. C., Levinson, D. H., Diamond, H. J., and Neumann, C.
J.: The International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS):
Unifying Tropical Cyclone Data, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 363–376,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2755.1, 2010.
Kumbier, K., Carvalho, R. C., Vafeidis, A. T., and Woodroffe, C. D.: Investigating compound flooding in an estuary using hydrodynamic modelling: a case study from the Shoalhaven River, Australia, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 463–477, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-463-2018, 2018.
Lee, J.-S.: Refined filtering of image noise using local statistics,
Comput. Graph. Image Process., 15, 380–389,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-664X(81)80018-4, 1981.
Leijnse, T., van Ormondt, M., Nederhoff, K., and van Dongeren, A.: Modeling
compound flooding in coastal systems using a computationally efficient
reduced-physics solver: Including fluvial, pluvial, tidal, wind- and
wave-driven processes, Coast. Eng., 163, 103796,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2020.103796, 2021.
Leonard, M., Westra, S., Phatak, A., Lambert, M., van den Hurk, B., Mcinnes,
K., Risbey, J., Schuster, S., Jakob, D., and Stafford-Smith, M.: A compound
event framework for understanding extreme impacts, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.
Clim. Change, 5, 113–128, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.252, 2014.
Lin, P., Pan, M., Beck, H. E., Yang, Y., Yamazaki, D., Frasson, R., David,
C. H., Durand, M., Pavelsky, T. M., Allen, G. H., Gleason, C. J., and Wood,
E. F.: Global Reconstruction of Naturalized River Flows at 2.94 Million
Reaches, Water Resour. Res., 55, 6499–6516,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025287, 2019.
Lin, P., Pan, M., Allen, G. H., Frasson, R. P., Zeng, Z., Yamazaki, D., and
Wood, E. F.: Global estimates of reach-level bankfull river width leveraging
big data geospatial analysis, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086405,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gl086405, 2020.
Markert, K. N., Markert, A. M., Mayer, T., Nauman, C., Haag, A., Poortinga,
A., Bhandari, B., Thwal, N. S., Kunlamai, T., Chishtie, F., Kwant, M.,
Phongsapan, K., Clinton, N., Towashiraporn, P., and Saah, D.: Comparing
Sentinel-1 Surface Water Mapping Algorithms and Radiometric Terrain
Correction Processing in Southeast Asia Utilizing Google Earth Engine,
Remote Sens., 12, 2469, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12152469, 2020.
Mateo, C. M. R., Yamazaki, D., Kim, H., Champathong, A., Vaze, J., and Oki, T.: Impacts of spatial resolution and representation of flow connectivity on large-scale simulation of floods, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5143–5163, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5143-2017, 2017.
Moftakhari, H. R., Salvadori, G., AghaKouchak, A., Sanders, B. F., and
Matthew, R. A.: Compounding effects of sea level rise and fluvial flooding,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 9785–9790,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620325114, 2017.
Muis, S., Apecechea, M. I., Dullaart, J., de Lima Rego, J., Madsen, K. S.,
Su, J., Yan, K., and Verlaan, M.: A high-resolution global dataset of
extreme sea levels, tides, and storm surges, including future projections,
Front. Mar. Sci., 7, 263, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00263, 2020.
Mulet, S., Rio, M.-H., Etienne, H., Artana, C., Cancet, M., Dibarboure, G., Feng, H., Husson, R., Picot, N., Provost, C., and Strub, P. T.: The new CNES-CLS18 global mean dynamic topography, Ocean Sci., 17, 789–808, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-789-2021, 2021.
Muñoz, D. F., Yin, D., Bakhtyar, R., Moftakhari, H., Xue, Z., Mandli,
K., and Ferreira, C.: Inter-model comparison of Delft3D-FM and 2D HEC-RAS
for total water level prediction in coastal to inland transition zones, J.
Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 58, 34–49, https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12952, 2021.
Neal, J., Hawker, L., Savage, J., Durand, M., Bates, P., and Sampson, C.:
Estimating river channel bathymetry in large scale flood inundation models,
Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR028301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020wr028301, 2021.
Neal, J. C., Schumann, G. J.-P., and Bates, P. D.: A subgrid channel model
for simulating river hydraulics and floodplain inundation over large and
data sparse areas, Water Resour. Res., 48, 1–16,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012514, 2012.
Olbert, A. I., Comer, J., Nash, S., and Hartnett, M.: High-resolution
multi-scale modelling of coastal flooding due to tides, storm surges and
rivers inflows. A Cork City example, Coast. Eng., 121, 278–296,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2016.12.006, 2017.
O'Loughlin, F. E., Neal, J. C., Yamazaki, D., and Bates, P. D.:
ICESat-derived inland water surface spot heights, Water Resour. Res., 52,
3276–3284, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018237, 2016.
Pearson, S. G., Storlazzi, C. D., van Dongeren, A. R., Tissier, M. F. S.,
and Reniers, A. J. H. M.: A Bayesian-based system to assess wave-driven
flooding hazards on coral reef-lined coasts, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans,
122, 10099–10117, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017jc013204, 2017.
Probst, P. and Annunziato, A.: Tropical Cyclone IDAI: Analysis of the wind,
rainfall and storm surge impact, Joint Research Centre, 9 pp., https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/sites/www.humanitarianresponse.info/files/documents/files/joint_research_centre_analysis_of_wind_rainfall_and_storm_surge_impact_09_april_2019.pdf (last access: 4 February 2023), 2019.
Resio, D. T. and Westerink, J. J.: Modeling the physics of storm surges,
Phys. Today, 61, 33, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2982120, 2008.
Röbke, B. R., Leijnse, T., Winter, G., van Ormondt, M., van Nieuwkoop,
J., and de Graaff, R.: Rapid Assessment of Tsunami Offshore Propagation and
Inundation with D-FLOW Flexible Mesh and SFINCS for the 2011 Tōhoku
Tsunami in Japan, J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 9, 453,
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9050453, 2021.
Sampson, C. C., Smith, A. M., Bates, P. D., Neal, J. C., Alfieri, L., and
Freer, J. E.: A high-resolution global flood hazard model, Water Resour.
Res., 51, 7358–7381, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR016954, 2015.
Santiago-Collazo, F. L., Bilskie, M. V., and Hagen, S. C.: A comprehensive
review of compound inundation models in low-gradient coastal watersheds,
Environ. Modell. Softw., 119, 166–181,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.06.002, 2019.
Savenije, H. H. G.: Prediction in ungauged estuaries: An integrated theory,
Water Resour. Res., 51, 2464–2476, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR016936,
2015.
Scussolini, P., Aerts, J. C. J. H., Jongman, B., Bouwer, L. M., Winsemius, H. C., de Moel, H., and Ward, P. J.: FLOPROS: an evolving global database of flood protection standards, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1049–1061, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1049-2016, 2016.
Sebastian, A., Bader, D. J., Nederhoff, C. M., Leijnse, T. W. B., Bricker,
J. D., and Aarninkhof, S. G. J.: Hindcast of pluvial, fluvial, and coastal
flood damage in Houston, Texas during Hurricane Harvey (2017) using SFINCS,
Nat. Hazards, 109, 2343–2362, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04922-3, 2021.
Shen, Y., Morsy, M. M., Huxley, C., Tahvildari, N., and Goodall, J. L.:
Flood risk assessment and increased resilience for coastal urban watersheds
under the combined impact of storm tide and heavy rainfall, J. Hydrol., 579,
124159, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124159, 2019.
Sosa, J., Sampson, C., Smith, A., Neal, J. C., and Bates, P. D.: A toolbox
to quickly prepare flood inundation models for LISFLOOD-FP simulations,
Environ. Modell. Softw., 123, 104561,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104561, 2020.
Stephens, E. and Bates, P.: Assessing the reliability of probabilistic flood
inundation model predictions, Hydrol. Process., 29, 4264–4283,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10451, 2015.
Stockdon, H. F., Holman, R. A., Howd, P. A., and Sallenger, A. H.: Empirical
parameterization of setup, swash, and runup, Coast. Eng., 53, 573–588,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2005.12.005, 2006.
Tellman, B., Sullivan, J. A., Kuhn, C., Kettner, A. J., Doyle, C. S.,
Brakenridge, G. R., Erickson, T. A., and Slayback, D. A.: Satellite imaging
reveals increased proportion of population exposed to floods, Nature, 596,
80–86, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03695-w, 2021.
Tiggeloven, T., de Moel, H., Winsemius, H. C., Eilander, D., Erkens, G., Gebremedhin, E., Diaz Loaiza, A., Kuzma, S., Luo, T., Iceland, C., Bouwman, A., van Huijstee, J., Ligtvoet, W., and Ward, P. J.: Global-scale benefit–cost analysis of coastal flood adaptation to different flood risk drivers using structural measures, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1025–1044, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1025-2020, 2020.
Torres, J. M., Bass, B., Irza, N., Fang, Z., Proft, J., Dawson, C., Kiani,
M., and Bedient, P.: Characterizing the hydraulic interactions of hurricane
storm surge and rainfall–runoff for the Houston–Galveston region, Coast.
Eng., 106, 7–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2015.09.004, 2015.
Trigg, M. A., Bates, P. D., Wilson, M. D., Schumann, G., and Baugh, C.:
Floodplain channel morphology and networks of the middle Amazon River, Water
Resour. Res., 48, W10504, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012wr011888, 2012.
Trigg, M. A., Birch, C. E., Neal, J. C., Bates, P. D., Smith, A., Sampson,
C. C., Yamazaki, D., Hirabayashi, Y., Pappenberger, F., Dutra, E., Ward, P.
J., Winsemius, H. C., Salamon, P., Dottori, F., Rudari, R., Kappes, M. S.,
Simpson, A. L., Hadzilacos, G., and Fewtrell, T. J.: The credibility
challenge for global fluvial flood risk analysis, Environ. Res. Lett., 11,
094014, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/094014, 2016.
Uhe, P., Mitchell, D., Bates, P. D., Addor, N., Neal, J., and Beck, H. E.: Model cascade from meteorological drivers to river flood hazard: flood-cascade v1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4865–4890, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4865-2021, 2021.
UNDRR: Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2019, United
Nations, 469 pp., eISBN 978-92-1-004180-5, https://www.undrr.org/publication/global-assessment-report-disaster-risk-reduction-2019 (last access: 2 February 2023), 2019.
UN OCHA: Cyclones Idai and Kenneth,
https://www.unocha.org/southern-and-eastern-africa-rosea/cyclones-idai-and-kenneth (last access: 4 February 2023),
18 March 2019.
UN OCHA: Daily Noon Briefing Highlights: Mozambique – Sudan,
https://www.unocha.org/story/daily-noon-briefing-highlights-mozambique-sudan (last access: 4 February 2023), 2021.
Urban, T. J., Schutz, B. E., and Neuenschwander, A. L.: A Survey of ICESat
Coastal Altimetry Applications: Continental Coast, Open Ocean Island, and
Inland River, TAO, 19, 1, https://doi.org/10.3319/TAO.2008.19.1-2.1(SA),
2008.
US Army Corps of Engineers: Coastal engineering manual, US Army Corps of
Engineers Washington, DC, report number 1110-2-1100, 477 pp., 2002.
van Berchum, E. C., van Ledden, M., Timmermans, J. S., Kwakkel, J. H., and Jonkman, S. N.: Rapid flood risk screening model for compound flood events in Beira, Mozambique, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2633–2646, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2633-2020, 2020.
van Ormondt, M., Nederhoff, K., and van Dongeren, A.: Delft Dashboard: a
quick set-up tool for hydrodynamic models, J. Hydroinform., 22,
510–527, https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2020.092, 2020.
van Zelst, V. T. M., Dijkstra, J. T., van Wesenbeeck, B. K., Eilander, D.,
Morris, E. P., Winsemius, H. C., Ward, P. J., and de Vries, M. B.: Cutting
the costs of coastal protection by integrating vegetation in flood defences,
Nat. Commun., 12, 6533, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26887-4, 2021.
Volp, N. D., van Prooijen, B. C., and Stelling, G. S.: A finite volume
approach for shallow water flow accounting for high-resolution bathymetry
and roughness data, Water Resour. Res., 49, 4126–4135,
https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20324, 2013.
Vousdoukas, M. I., Voukouvalas, E., Mentaschi, L., Dottori, F., Giardino, A., Bouziotas, D., Bianchi, A., Salamon, P., and Feyen, L.: Developments in large-scale coastal flood hazard mapping, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1841–1853, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1841-2016, 2016.
Vousdoukas, M. I., Mentaschi, L., Voukouvalas, E., Verlaan, M., Jevrejeva,
S., Jackson, L. P., and Feyen, L.: Global probabilistic projections of
extreme sea levels show intensification of coastal flood hazard, Nat.
Commun., 9, 2360, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04692-w, 2018.
Wahl, T., Jain, S., Bender, J., Meyers, S. D., and Luther, M. E.: Increasing
risk of compound flooding from storm surge and rainfall for major US cities,
Nat. Clim. Chang., 5, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2736, 2015.
Wang, X., Verlaan, M., Apecechea, M. I., and Lin, H. X.:
Computation-efficient parameter estimation for a high-resolution global tide
and surge model, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 126, e2020JC016917,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020jc016917, 2021.
Ward, P. J., Jongman, B., Salamon, P., Simpson, A., Bates, P. D., De Groeve,
T., Muis, S., de Perez, E. C., Rudari, R., Trigg, M. A., and Winsemius, H.
C.: Usefulness and limitations of global flood risk models, Nat. Clim.
Chang., 5, 712–715, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2742, 2015.
Ward, P. J., Couasnon, A., Eilander, D., Haigh, I. D., Hendry, A., Muis, S.,
Veldkamp, T. I. E., Winsemius, H. C., and Wahl, T.: Dependence between high
sea-level and high river discharge increases flood hazard in global deltas
and estuaries, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 084012,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aad400, 2018.
Ward, P. J., Blauhut, V., Bloemendaal, N., Daniell, J. E., de Ruiter, M. C., Duncan, M. J., Emberson, R., Jenkins, S. F., Kirschbaum, D., Kunz, M., Mohr, S., Muis, S., Riddell, G. A., Schäfer, A., Stanley, T., Veldkamp, T. I. E., and Winsemius, H. C.: Review article: Natural hazard risk assessments at the global scale, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1069–1096, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1069-2020, 2020.
Wing, O. E. J., Bates, P. D., Sampson, C. C., Smith, A. M., Johnson, K. A.,
and Erickson, T. A.: Validation of a 30 m resolution flood hazard model of
the conterminous United States, Water Resour. Res., 53, 7968–7986,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020917, 2017.
Wing, O. E. J., Bates, P. D., Neal, J. C., Sampson, C. C., Smith, A. M.,
Quinn, N., Shustikova, I., Domeneghetti, A., Gilles, D. W., Goska, R., and
Krajewski, W. F.: A New Automated Method for Improved Flood Defense
Representation in Large-Scale Hydraulic Models, Water Resour. Res., 55,
11007–11034, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025957, 2019.
Wing, O. E. J., Quinn, N., Bates, P. D., Neal, J. C., Smith, A. M., Sampson,
C. C., Coxon, G., Yamazaki, D., Sutanudjaja, E. H., and Alfieri, L.: Toward
Global Stochastic River Flood Modeling, Water Resour. Res., 56,
e2020WR027692, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027692, 2020.
Wing, O. E. J., Smith, A. M., Marston, M. L., Porter, J. R., Amodeo, M. F., Sampson, C. C., and Bates, P. D.: Simulating historical flood events at the continental scale: observational validation of a large-scale hydrodynamic model, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 559–575, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-559-2021, 2021.
Wood, M., Hostache, R., Neal, J., Wagener, T., Giustarini, L., Chini, M., Corato, G., Matgen, P., and Bates, P.: Calibration of channel depth and friction parameters in the LISFLOOD-FP hydraulic model using medium-resolution SAR data and identifiability techniques, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4983–4997, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4983-2016, 2016.
Yamazaki, D., Kanae, S., Kim, H., and Oki, T.: A physically based
description of floodplain inundation dynamics in a global river routing
model, Water Resour. Res., 47, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009726,
2011.
Yamazaki, D., Baugh, C. A., Bates, P. D., Kanae, S., Alsdorf, D. E., and
Oki, T.: Adjustment of a spaceborne DEM for use in floodplain hydrodynamic
modeling, J. Hydrol., 436–437, 81–91,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.045, 2012.
Yamazaki, D., de Almeida, G. A. M., and Bates, P. D.: Improving
computational efficiency in global river models by implementing the local
inertial flow equation and a vector-based river network map, Water Resour.
Res., 49, 7221–7235, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20552, 2013.
Yamazaki, D., Sato, T., Kanae, S., Hirabayashi, Y., and Bates, P. D.:
Regional flood dynamics in a bifurcating mega delta simulated in a global
river model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 3127–3135,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059744, 2014.
Yamazaki, D., Ikeshima, D., Tawatari, R., Yamaguchi, T., O'Loughlin, F.,
Neal, J. C., Sampson, C. C., Kanae, S., and Bates, P. D.: A high-accuracy
map of global terrain elevations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 5844–5853,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072874, 2017.
Yamazaki, D., Ikeshima, D., Sosa, J., Bates, P. D., Allen, G. H., and
Pavelsky, T. M.: MERIT hydro: A high-resolution global hydrography map based
on latest topography dataset, Water Resour. Res., 55, 5053–5073,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019wr024873, 2019.
Yang, Q., Shen, X., Anagnostou, E. N., Mo, C., Eggleston, J. R., and
Kettner, A. J.: A High-Resolution Flood Inundation Archive (2016–the
Present) from Sentinel-1 SAR Imagery over CONUS, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
102, E1064–E1079, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0319.1, 2021.
Zhao, F., Veldkamp, T. I. E., Frieler, K., Schewe, J., Ostberg, S., Willner,
S., Schauberger, B., Gosling, S. N., Schmied, H. M., Portmann, F. T., Leng,
G., Huang, M., Liu, X., Tang, Q., Hanasaki, N., Biemans, H., Gerten, D.,
Satoh, Y., Pokhrel, Y., Stacke, T., Ciais, P., Chang, J., Ducharne, A.,
Guimberteau, M., Wada, Y., Kim, H., and Yamazaki, D.: The critical role of
the routing scheme in simulating peak river discharge in global hydrological
models, Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 075003,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7250, 2017.
Zscheischler, J., Westra, S., van den Hurk, B. J. J. M., Seneviratne, S. I.,
Ward, P. J., Pitman, A., AghaKouchak, A., Bresch, D. N., Leonard, M., Wahl,
T., and Zhang, X.: Future climate risk from compound events, Nat. Clim.
Chang., 8, 469–477, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0156-3, 2018.
Short summary
In coastal deltas, flooding can occur from interactions between coastal, riverine, and pluvial drivers, so-called compound flooding. Global models however ignore these interactions. We present a framework for automated and reproducible compound flood modeling anywhere globally and validate it for two historical events in Mozambique with good results. The analysis reveals differences in compound flood dynamics between both events related to the magnitude of and time lag between drivers.
In coastal deltas, flooding can occur from interactions between coastal, riverine, and pluvial...
Special issue
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint