The manuscript can be an interesting contribution for the methodology of use and interpretation of data for the prediction of deep landslide movements. However, it requires a substantial review in the text, in the figures and in the production of additional figures to show the final results. The list presented below are the specific comments:

1) Sections 3.1 and 3.2 should be in the text in more synthetic form, placing much of the content in an appendix

2) In section 3.4.2 the equation of the MAPE, MAE and RSME objective function is not presented

3) Section 3.5 - Chou and Nguyen in 2024 article not present in the bibliography or not mentioned in the correct form

4) Section 3.5 - EQ. 10 and 11 - The meaning of the Maxit and Mind parameters are not indicated

5) Section 3.6.0-In Figure 9, references are indicated to the 18-19-20-21 and 22 equations. But these equations do not exist and the text

6) section 3.6.0 in Figure 9 and in the text the optimization stop criterion should be indicated.

7) Section 3.6.2. Figures 12 13 and 14 should be presented together in the same group with the same temporal axis. And an additional figure should be added to the group, with the temporal sequence of the rains

8) in Section 4, the comparative result of the deformations observations (shown in figure 14) with the comparative predictions of the best model should be graphically presented.

9) section 4.2 is too long and should be simplified and synthesized