Articles | Volume 17, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1231-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1231-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Review article
| 
20 Jul 2017
Review article |
| 20 Jul 2017
Review Article: A comparison of flood and earthquake vulnerability assessment indicators
Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081HV, the Netherlands
Philip J. Ward
Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081HV, the Netherlands
James E. Daniell
Geophysical Institute and Center for Disaster Management and Risk
Reduction Technology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, 76344, Germany
Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081HV, the Netherlands
Related authors
Kai Kornhuber, Emanuele Bevacqua, Mariana Madruga de Brito, Wiebke S. Jäger, Pauline Rivoire, Cassandra D. W. Rogers, Fabiola Banfi, Fulden Batibeniz, James Carruthers, Carlo De Michele, Silvia De Angeli, Cristina Deidda, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Andreas H. Fink, Henrique M. D. Goulart, Katharina Küpfer, Patrick Ludwig, Douglas Maraun, Gabriele Messori, Shruti Nath, Fiachra O'Loughlin, Joaquim G. Pinto, Benjamin Poschlod, Alexandre M. Ramos, Colin Raymond, Andreia F. S. Ribeiro, Deepti Singh, Laura Suarez Gutierrez, Philip J. Ward, and Christopher J. White
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4309–4334, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-4309-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-4309-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Impacts from extreme weather events may become more severe due to increased likelihood of compounding events under global warming, which challenge present day climate modelling and forecasting capacities. In this perspective we reflect on the usability of compound event research to bridge the gap between academic research and real-world applications.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Sophie L. Buijs, Inga J. Sauer, Chahan M. Kropf, Samuel Juhel, Zélie Stalhandske, Judith N. Claassen, and Marleen C. De Ruiter
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3559–3578, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-3559-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-3559-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We explored how disasters that occur before recovery from earlier events is complete can complicate recovery, using examples from science and the real world across different societal domains. We then reflect on why recovery under repeated disasters is more complex than simply returning to normal, and how the way we define recovery and the system we study shapes our understanding. These insights can help us better understand, study, and manage recovery from disasters.
Yoshio Kajitani, Maria Watson, Stephanie E. Chang, Elsamari Botha, Sophie L. Buijs, Siriporn Darnkachatarn, Sahar Derakhshan, Marleen de Ruiter, Juri Kim, Sanna Malinen, and Bernard Walker
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3993, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3993, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Short summary
Business recovery after COVID-19 has been uneven across regions and sectors. Using a survey of 3,454 firms in seven global regions, this study examines factors linked to recovery four to five years after the outbreak. The results show that non-governmental mentoring and training are more strongly associated with recovery than financial support alone, while small firms continue to face persistent challenges. These findings can help design better recovery policies for future crises.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Timothy Tiggeloven, Colin Raymond, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Jana Sillmann, Annegret H. Thieken, Sophie L. Buijs, Roxana Ciurean, Emma Cordier, Julia M. Crummy, Lydia Cumiskey, Kelley De Polt, Melanie Duncan, Davide M. Ferrario, Wiebke S. Jäger, Elco E. Koks, Nicole van Maanen, Heather J. Murdock, Jaroslav Mysiak, Sadhana Nirandjan, Benjamin Poschlod, Peter Priesmeier, Nivedita Sairam, Pia-Johanna Schweizer, Tristian R. Stolte, Marie-Luise Zenker, James E. Daniell, Alexander Fekete, Christian M. Geiß, Marc J. C. van den Homberg, Sirkku K. Juhola, Christian Kuhlicke, Karen Lebek, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Stefan Schneiderbauer, Silvia Torresan, Cees J. van Westen, Judith N. Claassen, Bijan Khazai, Virginia Murray, Julius Schlumberger, and Philip J. Ward
Geosci. Commun., 9, 185–221, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-9-185-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-9-185-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Natural hazards like floods, earthquakes, and landslides are often interconnected which may create bigger problems than when they occur alone. We studied expert discussions from an international conference to understand how scientists and policymakers can better prepare for these multi-hazards and use new technologies to protect its communities while contributing to dialogues about future international agreements beyond the Sendai Framework and supporting global sustainability goals.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Philip J. Ward, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Kees Boersma, Tomris Cesuroglu, Nathan Clark, Tina Comes, Ashok Dahal, Sonja Fransen, Jasper Verschuur, Carmen Anthonj, Srijith Balakrishnan, Jens de Bruijn, Eefje Hendriks, Rodrigo Mena Fluhmann, Goda Perlaviciute, Linda Steg, Marc van den Homberg, Cees van Westen, Funda Atun, Anja Schreijer, and Nicole van Maanen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1331, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1331, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We explore five core challenges that need to be addressed in order to move towards the Comprehensive Disaster and Climate Risk Management approach. This approach has been proposed within the newly emerging paradigm of a more holistic approach to managing the risks associated with climatic and/or non-climatic hazards and non-climatic risk drivers. We elaborate on each challenge, discuss why they matter for comprehensive disaster risk management, and provide ideas of how to overcome them.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Philip J. Ward, Sophie L. Buijs, Roxana Ciurean, Judith N. Claassen, James Daniell, Kelley De Polt, Melanie Duncan, Stefania Gottardo, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Julius Schlumberger, Timothy Tiggeloven, Silvia Torresan, Nicole van Maanen, Andrew Warren, Carmen D. Álvarez-Albelo, Vanessa Banks, Benjamin Blanz, Veronica Casartelli, Jordan Correa, Julia Crummy, Anne Sophie Daloz, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Juan José Díaz-Hernández, Jaime Díaz-Pacheco, Pedro Dorta Antequera, Davide Ferrario, David Geurts, Sara García-González, Joel C. Gill, Raúl Hernández-Martín, Wiebke S. Jäger, Abel López-Díez, Lin Ma, Jaroslav Mysiak, Diep Ngoc Nguyen, Noemi Padrón Fumero, Eva-Cristina Petrescu, Karina Reiter, Jana Sillmann, Lara Smale, and Tristian Stolte
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1325–1345, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-1325-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-1325-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Disasters often result from interactions between different hazards, like floods triggering landslides, or earthquakes followed by tropical cyclones, so-called multi-hazards. People and societies are increasingly exposed and vulnerable to these multi-hazards. Assessing these aspects is referred to as multi-risk assessment and management. In this paper we synthesise key learnings from the MYRIAD-EU (Multi-hazard and sYstemic framework for enhancing Risk-Informed mAnagement and Decision-making in the E.U.) project, reflecting on progress and challenges faced in addressing multi-hazards and multi-risk.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Nivedita Sairam and Marleen C. de Ruiter
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 119–130, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-119-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-119-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This paper highlights gaps in disaster risk assessments, particularly regarding disease outbreaks after natural hazards. It calls for: (1) learning from compound risk models to understand disaster and disease probabilities, (2) including health metrics in risk frameworks, and (3) improving data and modeling for health impacts. The authors propose a research agenda to enhance disaster risk management.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Yiting Zhu, Marleen de Ruiter, Sophie Buijs, and Nicole van Maanen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-94, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-94, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Restoring wetlands mitigates climate change, yet fears persist that they spread mosquito-borne diseases. We mapped environmental data across Indonesia to test this. Surprisingly, we found no significant link between high conservation value and disease risk. This proves that protecting nature does not necessarily endanger public health. Our results identify safe areas for conservation, demonstrating that we can safeguard both ecosystems and human communities simultaneously.
Julius Schlumberger, Tristian R. Stolte, Helena M. Garcia, Antonia Sebastian, Wiebke Jäger, Philip J. Ward, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Annegien Tijssen, and Mariana Madruga de Brito
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6132, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6132, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Flood vulnerability is too often analysed for one moment in time (static), whereas vulnerability is highly dynamic. We reviewed 67 articles for their flood vulnerability methodologies and found that traditional methods for unraveling flood vulnerability deal differently with dynamic vulnerability. Each method seems to lend itself well for specific concepts of dynamics and different aspects of vulnerability. We recommend to use the complementary strengths of these approaches to improve the field.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Nicole van Maanen, Marleen de Ruiter, Wiebke Jäger, Veronica Casartelli, Roxana Ciurean, Noemi Padrón-Fumero, Anne Sophie Daloz, David Geurts, Stefania Gottardo, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler, Abel López Diez, Jaime Díaz Pacheco, Pedro Dorta Antequera, Tamara Febles Arévalo, Sara García González, Raúl Hernández-Martín, Carmen Alvarez-Albelo, Juan José Diaz-Hernandez, Lin Ma, Letizia Monteleone, Karina Reiter, Tristian Stolte, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Silvia Torresan, Sharon Tatman, David Romero Manrique de Lara, Yeray Hernández González, and Philip J. Ward
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 2295–2311, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-2295-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-2295-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Disaster risk management faces growing challenges from multiple, changing hazards. Interviews with stakeholders in five European regions reveal that climate change, urban growth, and socio-economic shifts increase vulnerability and exposure. Measures to reduce one risk can worsen others, highlighting the need for better coordination. The study calls for flexible, context-specific strategies that connect scientific risk assessments with real-world decision-making.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Gwendoline Ducros, Timothy Tiggeloven, Lin Ma, Anne Sophie Daloz, Nina Schuhen, Judith Claassen, and Marleen C. de Ruiter
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4693–4712, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4693-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4693-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study finds that heatwave, drought and wildfire events occurring simultaneously in Scandinavia are pronounced in the summer months; and the heat-drought 2018 event led to a drop in gross domestic product, affecting agriculture and forestry imports, further impacting Europe's trade balance. This research shows the importance of ripple effects of multi-hazard, and that forest management and adaptation measures are vital to reducing the risks of heat-related multi-hazards in vulnerable areas.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Julius Schlumberger, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, Jung-Hee Hyun, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler, Marleen de Ruiter, and Marjolijn Haasnoot
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4089–4113, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4089-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4089-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a dashboard to help decision-makers manage risks in a changing climate. Using interactive visualizations, it simplifies complex choices, even with uncertain information. Tested with 54 users of varying expertise, it enabled accurate responses to 71–80 % of questions. Users valued its scenario exploration and detailed data features. While effective, the guidance and set of visualizations could be extended and the prototype could be adapted for broader applications.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Wiebke S. Jäger, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Timothy Tiggeloven, and Philip J. Ward
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2751–2769, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2751-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2751-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Multiple hazards, occurring simultaneously or consecutively, can have more extreme impacts than single hazards. We examined the disaster records in the global emergency events database EM-DAT to better understand this phenomenon. We developed a method to identify such multi-hazards and analysed their reported impacts using statistics. Multi-hazards have accounted for a disproportionate number of the impacts, but there appear to be different archetypal patterns in which the impacts compound.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Hunter C. Quintal, Antonia Sebastian, Marc L. Serre, Wiebke S. Jäger, and Marleen C. de Ruiter
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2870, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2870, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
High quality weather event datasets are crucial to community preparedness and resilience. Researchers create such datasets using clustering methods, which we advance by addressing current limitation in the relationship between space and time. We propose a method to determine the appropriate factor by which to resample the spatial resolution of the data prior to clustering. Ultimately, our approach increases the ability to detect historic heatwaves over current methods.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Sophie Kaashoek, Žiga Malek, Nadia Bloemendaal, and Marleen C. de Ruiter
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1963–1974, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1963-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1963-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Tropical storms are expected to get stronger all over the world, and this will have a big impact on people, buildings and important activities like growing bananas. Already, in different parts of the world, banana farms are being hurt by these storms, which makes banana prices go up and affects the people who grow them. We are not sure how these storms will affect bananas everywhere in the future. We assessed what happened to banana farms during storms in different parts of the world.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Ekta Aggarwal, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Kartikeya S. Sangwan, Rajiv Sinha, Sophie Buijs, Ranjay Shrestha, Sanjeev Gupta, and Alexander C. Whittaker
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3901, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3901, 2025
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
The occurrence of frequent floods in recent years due to changing weather, heavy rainfall, and the natural landscape, has caused major damage to lives and property. This study looks at flood risks in the Ganga Basin, focusing on the factors that cause floods, the areas affected, and the vulnerability of people. The study uses NASA's night-time lights to track human activities. This helps to show how risks are connected to expanding human activities, and changing resilience to floods.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Julius Schlumberger, Tristian Stolte, Helena Margaret Garcia, Antonia Sebastian, Wiebke Jäger, Philip Ward, Marleen de Ruiter, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Annegien Tijssen, and Mariana Madruga de Brito
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-850, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-850, 2025
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
The risk flood of flood impacts is dynamic as society continuously responds to specific events or ongoing developments. We analyzed 28 studies that assess such dynamics of vulnerability. Most research uses surveys and basic statistics data, while integrated, flexible models are seldom used. The studies struggle to link specific events or developments to the observed changes. Our findings highlight needs and possible directions towards a better assessment of vulnerability dynamics.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Joshua Green, Ivan D. Haigh, Niall Quinn, Jeff Neal, Thomas Wahl, Melissa Wood, Dirk Eilander, Marleen de Ruiter, Philip Ward, and Paula Camus
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 747–816, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-747-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-747-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Compound flooding, involving the combination or successive occurrence of two or more flood drivers, can amplify flood impacts in coastal/estuarine regions. This paper reviews the practices, trends, methodologies, applications, and findings of coastal compound flooding literature at regional to global scales. We explore the types of compound flood events, their mechanistic processes, and the range of terminology. Lastly, this review highlights knowledge gaps and implications for future practices.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Heidi Kreibich, Kai Schröter, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Anne F. Van Loon, Maurizio Mazzoleni, Guta Wakbulcho Abeshu, Svetlana Agafonova, Amir AghaKouchak, Hafzullah Aksoy, Camila Alvarez-Garreton, Blanca Aznar, Laila Balkhi, Marlies H. Barendrecht, Sylvain Biancamaria, Liduin Bos-Burgering, Chris Bradley, Yus Budiyono, Wouter Buytaert, Lucinda Capewell, Hayley Carlson, Yonca Cavus, Anaïs Couasnon, Gemma Coxon, Ioannis Daliakopoulos, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Claire Delus, Mathilde Erfurt, Giuseppe Esposito, Didier François, Frédéric Frappart, Jim Freer, Natalia Frolova, Animesh K. Gain, Manolis Grillakis, Jordi Oriol Grima, Diego A. Guzmán, Laurie S. Huning, Monica Ionita, Maxim Kharlamov, Dao Nguyen Khoi, Natalie Kieboom, Maria Kireeva, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Waldo Lavado-Casimiro, Hong-Yi Li, Maria Carmen LLasat, David Macdonald, Johanna Mård, Hannah Mathew-Richards, Andrew McKenzie, Alfonso Mejia, Eduardo Mario Mendiondo, Marjolein Mens, Shifteh Mobini, Guilherme Samprogna Mohor, Viorica Nagavciuc, Thanh Ngo-Duc, Huynh Thi Thao Nguyen, Pham Thi Thao Nhi, Olga Petrucci, Nguyen Hong Quan, Pere Quintana-Seguí, Saman Razavi, Elena Ridolfi, Jannik Riegel, Md Shibly Sadik, Nivedita Sairam, Elisa Savelli, Alexey Sazonov, Sanjib Sharma, Johanna Sörensen, Felipe Augusto Arguello Souza, Kerstin Stahl, Max Steinhausen, Michael Stoelzle, Wiwiana Szalińska, Qiuhong Tang, Fuqiang Tian, Tamara Tokarczyk, Carolina Tovar, Thi Van Thu Tran, Marjolein H. J. van Huijgevoort, Michelle T. H. van Vliet, Sergiy Vorogushyn, Thorsten Wagener, Yueling Wang, Doris E. Wendt, Elliot Wickham, Long Yang, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini, and Philip J. Ward
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2009–2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2009-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2009-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
As the adverse impacts of hydrological extremes increase in many regions of the world, a better understanding of the drivers of changes in risk and impacts is essential for effective flood and drought risk management. We present a dataset containing data of paired events, i.e. two floods or two droughts that occurred in the same area. The dataset enables comparative analyses and allows detailed context-specific assessments. Additionally, it supports the testing of socio-hydrological models.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Philip J. Ward, James Daniell, Melanie Duncan, Anna Dunne, Cédric Hananel, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler, Annegien Tijssen, Silvia Torresan, Roxana Ciurean, Joel C. Gill, Jana Sillmann, Anaïs Couasnon, Elco Koks, Noemi Padrón-Fumero, Sharon Tatman, Marianne Tronstad Lund, Adewole Adesiyun, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, Alexander Alabaster, Bernard Bulder, Carlos Campillo Torres, Andrea Critto, Raúl Hernández-Martín, Marta Machado, Jaroslav Mysiak, Rene Orth, Irene Palomino Antolín, Eva-Cristina Petrescu, Markus Reichstein, Timothy Tiggeloven, Anne F. Van Loon, Hung Vuong Pham, and Marleen C. de Ruiter
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1487–1497, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1487-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1487-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The majority of natural-hazard risk research focuses on single hazards (a flood, a drought, a volcanic eruption, an earthquake, etc.). In the international research and policy community it is recognised that risk management could benefit from a more systemic approach. In this perspective paper, we argue for an approach that addresses multi-hazard, multi-risk management through the lens of sustainability challenges that cut across sectors, regions, and hazards.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Lucas Wouters, Anaïs Couasnon, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Marc J. C. van den Homberg, Aklilu Teklesadik, and Hans de Moel
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3199–3218, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3199-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3199-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This research introduces a novel approach to estimate flood damage in Malawi by applying a machine learning model to UAV imagery. We think that the development of such a model is an essential step to enable the swift allocation of resources for recovery by humanitarian decision-makers. By comparing this method (EUR 10 140) to a conventional land-use-based approach (EUR 15 782) for a specific flood event, recommendations are made for future assessments.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Kai Kornhuber, Emanuele Bevacqua, Mariana Madruga de Brito, Wiebke S. Jäger, Pauline Rivoire, Cassandra D. W. Rogers, Fabiola Banfi, Fulden Batibeniz, James Carruthers, Carlo De Michele, Silvia De Angeli, Cristina Deidda, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Andreas H. Fink, Henrique M. D. Goulart, Katharina Küpfer, Patrick Ludwig, Douglas Maraun, Gabriele Messori, Shruti Nath, Fiachra O'Loughlin, Joaquim G. Pinto, Benjamin Poschlod, Alexandre M. Ramos, Colin Raymond, Andreia F. S. Ribeiro, Deepti Singh, Laura Suarez Gutierrez, Philip J. Ward, and Christopher J. White
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4309–4334, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-4309-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-4309-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Impacts from extreme weather events may become more severe due to increased likelihood of compounding events under global warming, which challenge present day climate modelling and forecasting capacities. In this perspective we reflect on the usability of compound event research to bridge the gap between academic research and real-world applications.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Tarun Sadana, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, Dirk Eilander, Bruno Merz, Hans de Moel, Tim Busker, Veerle C. Bril, and Jens de Bruijn
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 30, 5491–5519, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-5491-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-5491-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluated the open-source hydrodynamic model SFINCS using satellite data from 499 historical flood events across 96 countries. Our study shows that larger upstream river basins are modelled more accurately, while using observed river gauges and high-resolution elevation data can improve results. Our findings highlight the importance of large-scale validation with satellite data and sensitivity analyses to enhance future global flood hazard assessments and prediction accuracy.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Sophie L. Buijs, Inga J. Sauer, Chahan M. Kropf, Samuel Juhel, Zélie Stalhandske, Judith N. Claassen, and Marleen C. De Ruiter
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3559–3578, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-3559-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-3559-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We explored how disasters that occur before recovery from earlier events is complete can complicate recovery, using examples from science and the real world across different societal domains. We then reflect on why recovery under repeated disasters is more complex than simply returning to normal, and how the way we define recovery and the system we study shapes our understanding. These insights can help us better understand, study, and manage recovery from disasters.
Yoshio Kajitani, Maria Watson, Stephanie E. Chang, Elsamari Botha, Sophie L. Buijs, Siriporn Darnkachatarn, Sahar Derakhshan, Marleen de Ruiter, Juri Kim, Sanna Malinen, and Bernard Walker
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3993, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3993, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Short summary
Business recovery after COVID-19 has been uneven across regions and sectors. Using a survey of 3,454 firms in seven global regions, this study examines factors linked to recovery four to five years after the outbreak. The results show that non-governmental mentoring and training are more strongly associated with recovery than financial support alone, while small firms continue to face persistent challenges. These findings can help design better recovery policies for future crises.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Timothy Tiggeloven, Colin Raymond, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Jana Sillmann, Annegret H. Thieken, Sophie L. Buijs, Roxana Ciurean, Emma Cordier, Julia M. Crummy, Lydia Cumiskey, Kelley De Polt, Melanie Duncan, Davide M. Ferrario, Wiebke S. Jäger, Elco E. Koks, Nicole van Maanen, Heather J. Murdock, Jaroslav Mysiak, Sadhana Nirandjan, Benjamin Poschlod, Peter Priesmeier, Nivedita Sairam, Pia-Johanna Schweizer, Tristian R. Stolte, Marie-Luise Zenker, James E. Daniell, Alexander Fekete, Christian M. Geiß, Marc J. C. van den Homberg, Sirkku K. Juhola, Christian Kuhlicke, Karen Lebek, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Stefan Schneiderbauer, Silvia Torresan, Cees J. van Westen, Judith N. Claassen, Bijan Khazai, Virginia Murray, Julius Schlumberger, and Philip J. Ward
Geosci. Commun., 9, 185–221, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-9-185-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-9-185-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Natural hazards like floods, earthquakes, and landslides are often interconnected which may create bigger problems than when they occur alone. We studied expert discussions from an international conference to understand how scientists and policymakers can better prepare for these multi-hazards and use new technologies to protect its communities while contributing to dialogues about future international agreements beyond the Sendai Framework and supporting global sustainability goals.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Ileen N. Streefkerk, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, Jens de Bruijn, Khalid Hassaballah, Rhoda Achieng' Odongo, Teun Schrieks, Oliver Wasonga, and Anne F. Van Loon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 30, 2225–2245, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-2225-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-2225-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
In East Africa are conflict over water and vegetation prominent. On top of that, water abstraction of commercial farms are increasing the competition of water. Therefore, this study has developed a model which can investigate what the influence is of these farming activities on the water balance of the region and people's livelihood activities in times of dry periods. We do that by ‘replacing’ the farms in the model, and see what the effect would be if there were communities or forests instead.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Philip J. Ward, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Kees Boersma, Tomris Cesuroglu, Nathan Clark, Tina Comes, Ashok Dahal, Sonja Fransen, Jasper Verschuur, Carmen Anthonj, Srijith Balakrishnan, Jens de Bruijn, Eefje Hendriks, Rodrigo Mena Fluhmann, Goda Perlaviciute, Linda Steg, Marc van den Homberg, Cees van Westen, Funda Atun, Anja Schreijer, and Nicole van Maanen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1331, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1331, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We explore five core challenges that need to be addressed in order to move towards the Comprehensive Disaster and Climate Risk Management approach. This approach has been proposed within the newly emerging paradigm of a more holistic approach to managing the risks associated with climatic and/or non-climatic hazards and non-climatic risk drivers. We elaborate on each challenge, discuss why they matter for comprehensive disaster risk management, and provide ideas of how to overcome them.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Tim Busker, Daniela Rodriguez Castro, Sergiy Vorogushyn, Jaap Kwadijk, Davide Zoccatelli, Rafaella G. L. Oliveira, Heather J. Murdock, Laurent Pfister, Benjamin Dewals, Kymo Slager, Annegret H. Thieken, Jan Verkade, Patrick Willems, and Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1457–1478, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-1457-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-1457-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
In July 2021, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Germany, and Belgium were hit by an extreme flood event with over 200 fatalities. Our study provides, for the first time, critical insights into the operational flood early-warning systems in this entire region. Based on 14 expert interviews, we conclude that the systems strongly improved in all countries. Interviewees stressed the need for operational impact-based forecasts, but emphasized that its operational implementation is challenging.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Philip J. Ward, Sophie L. Buijs, Roxana Ciurean, Judith N. Claassen, James Daniell, Kelley De Polt, Melanie Duncan, Stefania Gottardo, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Julius Schlumberger, Timothy Tiggeloven, Silvia Torresan, Nicole van Maanen, Andrew Warren, Carmen D. Álvarez-Albelo, Vanessa Banks, Benjamin Blanz, Veronica Casartelli, Jordan Correa, Julia Crummy, Anne Sophie Daloz, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Juan José Díaz-Hernández, Jaime Díaz-Pacheco, Pedro Dorta Antequera, Davide Ferrario, David Geurts, Sara García-González, Joel C. Gill, Raúl Hernández-Martín, Wiebke S. Jäger, Abel López-Díez, Lin Ma, Jaroslav Mysiak, Diep Ngoc Nguyen, Noemi Padrón Fumero, Eva-Cristina Petrescu, Karina Reiter, Jana Sillmann, Lara Smale, and Tristian Stolte
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1325–1345, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-1325-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-1325-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Disasters often result from interactions between different hazards, like floods triggering landslides, or earthquakes followed by tropical cyclones, so-called multi-hazards. People and societies are increasingly exposed and vulnerable to these multi-hazards. Assessing these aspects is referred to as multi-risk assessment and management. In this paper we synthesise key learnings from the MYRIAD-EU (Multi-hazard and sYstemic framework for enhancing Risk-Informed mAnagement and Decision-making in the E.U.) project, reflecting on progress and challenges faced in addressing multi-hazards and multi-risk.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Huazhi Li, Robert A. Jane, Dirk Eilander, Alejandra R. Enríquez, Toon Haer, and Philip J. Ward
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 391–409, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-391-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-391-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We assess the likelihood of widespread compound flooding along the U.S. coastline. Using a large set of generated plausible events preserving observed dependence, we find that nearly half of compound floods on the West coast affect multiple sites. Such events are rarer on the East coast while most compound events affect single sites on the Gulf coast. Our results underscore the importance of including spatial dependence in compound flood risk assessment and can help in better risk management.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Nivedita Sairam and Marleen C. de Ruiter
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 119–130, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-119-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-119-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This paper highlights gaps in disaster risk assessments, particularly regarding disease outbreaks after natural hazards. It calls for: (1) learning from compound risk models to understand disaster and disease probabilities, (2) including health metrics in risk frameworks, and (3) improving data and modeling for health impacts. The authors propose a research agenda to enhance disaster risk management.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Yiting Zhu, Marleen de Ruiter, Sophie Buijs, and Nicole van Maanen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-94, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-94, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Restoring wetlands mitigates climate change, yet fears persist that they spread mosquito-borne diseases. We mapped environmental data across Indonesia to test this. Surprisingly, we found no significant link between high conservation value and disease risk. This proves that protecting nature does not necessarily endanger public health. Our results identify safe areas for conservation, demonstrating that we can safeguard both ecosystems and human communities simultaneously.
Julius Schlumberger, Tristian R. Stolte, Helena M. Garcia, Antonia Sebastian, Wiebke Jäger, Philip J. Ward, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Annegien Tijssen, and Mariana Madruga de Brito
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6132, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6132, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Flood vulnerability is too often analysed for one moment in time (static), whereas vulnerability is highly dynamic. We reviewed 67 articles for their flood vulnerability methodologies and found that traditional methods for unraveling flood vulnerability deal differently with dynamic vulnerability. Each method seems to lend itself well for specific concepts of dynamics and different aspects of vulnerability. We recommend to use the complementary strengths of these approaches to improve the field.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Nicole van Maanen, Marleen de Ruiter, Wiebke Jäger, Veronica Casartelli, Roxana Ciurean, Noemi Padrón-Fumero, Anne Sophie Daloz, David Geurts, Stefania Gottardo, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler, Abel López Diez, Jaime Díaz Pacheco, Pedro Dorta Antequera, Tamara Febles Arévalo, Sara García González, Raúl Hernández-Martín, Carmen Alvarez-Albelo, Juan José Diaz-Hernandez, Lin Ma, Letizia Monteleone, Karina Reiter, Tristian Stolte, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Silvia Torresan, Sharon Tatman, David Romero Manrique de Lara, Yeray Hernández González, and Philip J. Ward
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 2295–2311, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-2295-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-2295-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Disaster risk management faces growing challenges from multiple, changing hazards. Interviews with stakeholders in five European regions reveal that climate change, urban growth, and socio-economic shifts increase vulnerability and exposure. Measures to reduce one risk can worsen others, highlighting the need for better coordination. The study calls for flexible, context-specific strategies that connect scientific risk assessments with real-world decision-making.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Wei Li, Philip J. Ward, and Lia van Wesenbeeck
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4663, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4663, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a novel model that captures the interactions among water, energy, and food, revealing how human activities and natural processes mutually shape one another. It shows how human activities alter water quantity and quality, and how these changes reshape resource availability and subsequent human resource use. The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei case study demonstrates the model's value for advancing hydrological science and informing sustainable and equitable resource management.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Gwendoline Ducros, Timothy Tiggeloven, Lin Ma, Anne Sophie Daloz, Nina Schuhen, Judith Claassen, and Marleen C. de Ruiter
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4693–4712, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4693-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4693-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study finds that heatwave, drought and wildfire events occurring simultaneously in Scandinavia are pronounced in the summer months; and the heat-drought 2018 event led to a drop in gross domestic product, affecting agriculture and forestry imports, further impacting Europe's trade balance. This research shows the importance of ripple effects of multi-hazard, and that forest management and adaptation measures are vital to reducing the risks of heat-related multi-hazards in vulnerable areas.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Aaron Buhrmann, Cecilia I. Nievas, Nivedita Sairam, James E. Daniell, Heidi Kreibich, and Seth Bryant
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5172, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5172, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our research lays the groundwork for the next generation of disaster risk modelling by improving how building-level value and use are estimated across Germany. By testing multiple data sources and methods, we identify a transparent, adaptable approach that enhances forecasts of damage and recovery—helping protect lives, property, and communities.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Vylon Ooms, Thijs Endendijk, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, W. J. Wouter Botzen, and Peter J. Robinson
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4283–4298, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4283-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4283-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Intense rainfall events cause increasingly severe damages to urban areas globally. We use unique insurance claims data to study the effect of nature-based and other adaptation measures on damage. We compare an area in Amsterdam where measures have been implemented to a similar, adjacent area without measures using an innovative method. We find a significant reduction of damage where the adaptation measures were implemented. Urban areas can reduce rain damage by implementing adaptation measures.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Christopher J. White, Mohammed Sarfaraz Gani Adnan, Marcello Arosio, Stephanie Buller, YoungHwa Cha, Roxana Ciurean, Julia M. Crummy, Melanie Duncan, Joel Gill, Claire Kennedy, Elisa Nobile, Lara Smale, and Philip J. Ward
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4263–4281, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4263-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4263-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Indicators contain observable and measurable characteristics to understand the state of a concept or phenomenon and/or monitor it over time. There have been limited efforts to understand how indicators are being used in multi-hazard and multi-risk contexts. We find most of existing indicators do not include the interactions between hazards or risks. We propose a set of recommendations to enable the development and uptake of multi-hazard and multi-risk indicators.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Julius Schlumberger, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, Jung-Hee Hyun, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler, Marleen de Ruiter, and Marjolijn Haasnoot
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4089–4113, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4089-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4089-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a dashboard to help decision-makers manage risks in a changing climate. Using interactive visualizations, it simplifies complex choices, even with uncertain information. Tested with 54 users of varying expertise, it enabled accurate responses to 71–80 % of questions. Users valued its scenario exploration and detailed data features. While effective, the guidance and set of visualizations could be extended and the prototype could be adapted for broader applications.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Wiebke S. Jäger, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Timothy Tiggeloven, and Philip J. Ward
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2751–2769, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2751-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2751-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Multiple hazards, occurring simultaneously or consecutively, can have more extreme impacts than single hazards. We examined the disaster records in the global emergency events database EM-DAT to better understand this phenomenon. We developed a method to identify such multi-hazards and analysed their reported impacts using statistics. Multi-hazards have accounted for a disproportionate number of the impacts, but there appear to be different archetypal patterns in which the impacts compound.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Lou Brett, Christopher J. White, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Bart van den Hurk, Philip Ward, and Jakob Zscheischler
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2591–2611, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2591-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2591-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Compound events, where multiple weather or climate hazards occur together, pose significant risks to both society and the environment. These events, like simultaneous wind and rain, can have more severe impacts than single hazards. Our review of compound event research from 2012–2022 reveals a rise in studies, especially on events that occur concurrently, hot and dry events, and compounding flooding. The review also highlights opportunities for research in the coming years.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Irene Benito, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, Philip J. Ward, Dirk Eilander, and Sanne Muis
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2287–2315, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2287-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2287-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Global flood models are key to the mitigation of coastal flooding impacts, yet they still have limitations when providing actionable insights locally. We present a multiscale framework that couples dynamic water level and flood models and bridges the fully global and local modelling approaches. We apply it to three historical storms. Our findings reveal that the importance of model refinements varies based on the study area characteristics and the storm’s nature.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Hunter C. Quintal, Antonia Sebastian, Marc L. Serre, Wiebke S. Jäger, and Marleen C. de Ruiter
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2870, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2870, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
High quality weather event datasets are crucial to community preparedness and resilience. Researchers create such datasets using clustering methods, which we advance by addressing current limitation in the relationship between space and time. We propose a method to determine the appropriate factor by which to resample the spatial resolution of the data prior to clustering. Ultimately, our approach increases the ability to detect historic heatwaves over current methods.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Nicole van Maanen, Joël J.-F. G. De Plaen, Timothy Tiggeloven, Maria Luisa Colmenares, Philip J. Ward, Paolo Scussolini, and Elco Koks
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2075–2080, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2075-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2075-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding coastal flood protection is vital for assessing risks from natural disasters and climate change. However, current global data on coastal flood protection are limited and based on simplified assumptions, leading to potential uncertainties in risk estimates. As a step in this direction, we propose a comprehensive dataset, COASTtal flood PROtection Standards within EUrope (COASTPROS-EU), which compiles coastal flood protection standards in Europe.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Sophie Kaashoek, Žiga Malek, Nadia Bloemendaal, and Marleen C. de Ruiter
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1963–1974, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1963-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1963-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Tropical storms are expected to get stronger all over the world, and this will have a big impact on people, buildings and important activities like growing bananas. Already, in different parts of the world, banana farms are being hurt by these storms, which makes banana prices go up and affects the people who grow them. We are not sure how these storms will affect bananas everywhere in the future. We assessed what happened to banana farms during storms in different parts of the world.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Danhua Xin, James Edward Daniell, Zhenguo Zhang, Friedemann Wenzel, Shaun Shuxun Wang, and Xiaofei Chen
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1597–1620, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1597-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1597-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
A high-resolution fixed-asset model can help improve the accuracy of earthquake loss assessment. We develop a grid-level fixed-asset model for China from 1951 to 2020. We first compile the provincial-level fixed asset from yearbook-related statistics. Then, this dataset is disaggregated into 1 km × 1 km grids by using multiple remote sensing data as the weight indicator. We find that the fixed-asset value increased rapidly after the 1980s and reached CNY 589.31 trillion in 2020.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Ekta Aggarwal, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Kartikeya S. Sangwan, Rajiv Sinha, Sophie Buijs, Ranjay Shrestha, Sanjeev Gupta, and Alexander C. Whittaker
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3901, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3901, 2025
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
The occurrence of frequent floods in recent years due to changing weather, heavy rainfall, and the natural landscape, has caused major damage to lives and property. This study looks at flood risks in the Ganga Basin, focusing on the factors that cause floods, the areas affected, and the vulnerability of people. The study uses NASA's night-time lights to track human activities. This helps to show how risks are connected to expanding human activities, and changing resilience to floods.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Maurice W. M. L. Kalthof, Jens de Bruijn, Hans de Moel, Heidi Kreibich, and Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1013–1035, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1013-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1013-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study explores how farmers in India's Bhima basin respond to consecutive droughts. We simulated farmers' individual choices – like changing crops or digging wells – and their effects on profits, yields, and water resources. Results show these adaptations, while improving incomes, ultimately increase drought vulnerability and damage. Such insights emphasize the need for alternative adaptations and highlight the value of socio-hydrological models in shaping policies to lessen drought impacts.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Julius Schlumberger, Tristian Stolte, Helena Margaret Garcia, Antonia Sebastian, Wiebke Jäger, Philip Ward, Marleen de Ruiter, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Annegien Tijssen, and Mariana Madruga de Brito
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-850, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-850, 2025
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
The risk flood of flood impacts is dynamic as society continuously responds to specific events or ongoing developments. We analyzed 28 studies that assess such dynamics of vulnerability. Most research uses surveys and basic statistics data, while integrated, flexible models are seldom used. The studies struggle to link specific events or developments to the observed changes. Our findings highlight needs and possible directions towards a better assessment of vulnerability dynamics.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Nadja Veigel, Heidi Kreibich, Jens A. de Bruijn, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, and Andrea Cominola
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 879–891, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-879-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-879-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores how social media, specifically Twitter (X), can help us understand public reactions to floods in Germany from 2014 to 2021. Using large language models, we extract topics and patterns of behavior from flood-related tweets. The findings offer insights to improve communication and disaster management. Topics related to low-impact flooding contain descriptive hazard-related content, while the focus shifts to catastrophic impacts and responsibilities during high-impact events.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Joshua Green, Ivan D. Haigh, Niall Quinn, Jeff Neal, Thomas Wahl, Melissa Wood, Dirk Eilander, Marleen de Ruiter, Philip Ward, and Paula Camus
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 747–816, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-747-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-747-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Compound flooding, involving the combination or successive occurrence of two or more flood drivers, can amplify flood impacts in coastal/estuarine regions. This paper reviews the practices, trends, methodologies, applications, and findings of coastal compound flooding literature at regional to global scales. We explore the types of compound flood events, their mechanistic processes, and the range of terminology. Lastly, this review highlights knowledge gaps and implications for future practices.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Kushagra Pandey, Jens A. de Bruijn, Hans de Moel, W. J. Wouter Botzen, and Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4409–4429, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4409-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4409-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
As sea levels rise, coastal areas will experience more frequent flooding, and salt water will start seeping into the soil, which is a serious issue for farmers who rely on good soil quality for their crops. Here, we studied coastal Mozambique to understand the risks from sea level rise and flooding by looking at how salt intrusion affects farming and how floods damage buildings. We find that 15 %–21 % of coastal households will adapt and 13 %–20 % will migrate to inland areas in the future.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Sadhana Nirandjan, Elco E. Koks, Mengqi Ye, Raghav Pant, Kees C. H. Van Ginkel, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, and Philip J. Ward
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4341–4368, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4341-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4341-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Critical infrastructures (CIs) are exposed to natural hazards, which may result in significant damage and burden society. Vulnerability is a key determinant for reducing these risks, yet crucial information is scattered in the literature. Our study reviews over 1510 fragility and vulnerability curves for CI assets, creating a unique publicly available physical vulnerability database that can be directly used for hazard risk assessments, including floods, earthquakes, windstorms, and landslides.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Viet Dung Nguyen, Jeroen Aerts, Max Tesselaar, Wouter Botzen, Heidi Kreibich, Lorenzo Alfieri, and Bruno Merz
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2923–2937, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2923-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2923-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our study explored how seasonal flood forecasts could enhance insurance premium accuracy. Insurers traditionally rely on historical data, yet climate fluctuations influence flood risk. We employed a method that predicts seasonal floods to adjust premiums accordingly. Our findings showed significant year-to-year variations in flood risk and premiums, underscoring the importance of adaptability. Despite limitations, this research aids insurers in preparing for evolving risks.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Eric Mortensen, Timothy Tiggeloven, Toon Haer, Bas van Bemmel, Dewi Le Bars, Sanne Muis, Dirk Eilander, Frederiek Sperna Weiland, Arno Bouwman, Willem Ligtvoet, and Philip J. Ward
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1381–1400, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1381-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1381-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Current levels of coastal flood risk are projected to increase in coming decades due to various reasons, e.g. sea-level rise, land subsidence, and coastal urbanization: action is needed to minimize this future risk. We evaluate dykes and coastal levees, foreshore vegetation, zoning restrictions, and dry-proofing on a global scale to estimate what levels of risk reductions are possible. We demonstrate that there are several potential adaptation pathways forward for certain areas of the world.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Dirk Eilander, Anaïs Couasnon, Frederiek C. Sperna Weiland, Willem Ligtvoet, Arno Bouwman, Hessel C. Winsemius, and Philip J. Ward
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2251–2272, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2251-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2251-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a framework for assessing compound flood risk using hydrodynamic, impact, and statistical modeling. A pilot in Mozambique shows the importance of accounting for compound events in risk assessments. We also show how the framework can be used to assess the effectiveness of different risk reduction measures. As the framework is based on global datasets and is largely automated, it can easily be applied in other areas for first-order assessments of compound flood risk.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Job C. M. Dullaart, Sanne Muis, Hans de Moel, Philip J. Ward, Dirk Eilander, and Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1847–1862, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1847-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1847-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Coastal flooding is driven by storm surges and high tides and can be devastating. To gain an understanding of the threat posed by coastal flooding and to identify areas that are especially at risk, now and in the future, it is crucial to accurately model coastal inundation and assess the coastal flood hazard. Here, we present a global dataset with hydrographs that represent the typical evolution of an extreme sea level. These can be used to model coastal inundation more accurately.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Heidi Kreibich, Kai Schröter, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Anne F. Van Loon, Maurizio Mazzoleni, Guta Wakbulcho Abeshu, Svetlana Agafonova, Amir AghaKouchak, Hafzullah Aksoy, Camila Alvarez-Garreton, Blanca Aznar, Laila Balkhi, Marlies H. Barendrecht, Sylvain Biancamaria, Liduin Bos-Burgering, Chris Bradley, Yus Budiyono, Wouter Buytaert, Lucinda Capewell, Hayley Carlson, Yonca Cavus, Anaïs Couasnon, Gemma Coxon, Ioannis Daliakopoulos, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Claire Delus, Mathilde Erfurt, Giuseppe Esposito, Didier François, Frédéric Frappart, Jim Freer, Natalia Frolova, Animesh K. Gain, Manolis Grillakis, Jordi Oriol Grima, Diego A. Guzmán, Laurie S. Huning, Monica Ionita, Maxim Kharlamov, Dao Nguyen Khoi, Natalie Kieboom, Maria Kireeva, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Waldo Lavado-Casimiro, Hong-Yi Li, Maria Carmen LLasat, David Macdonald, Johanna Mård, Hannah Mathew-Richards, Andrew McKenzie, Alfonso Mejia, Eduardo Mario Mendiondo, Marjolein Mens, Shifteh Mobini, Guilherme Samprogna Mohor, Viorica Nagavciuc, Thanh Ngo-Duc, Huynh Thi Thao Nguyen, Pham Thi Thao Nhi, Olga Petrucci, Nguyen Hong Quan, Pere Quintana-Seguí, Saman Razavi, Elena Ridolfi, Jannik Riegel, Md Shibly Sadik, Nivedita Sairam, Elisa Savelli, Alexey Sazonov, Sanjib Sharma, Johanna Sörensen, Felipe Augusto Arguello Souza, Kerstin Stahl, Max Steinhausen, Michael Stoelzle, Wiwiana Szalińska, Qiuhong Tang, Fuqiang Tian, Tamara Tokarczyk, Carolina Tovar, Thi Van Thu Tran, Marjolein H. J. van Huijgevoort, Michelle T. H. van Vliet, Sergiy Vorogushyn, Thorsten Wagener, Yueling Wang, Doris E. Wendt, Elliot Wickham, Long Yang, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini, and Philip J. Ward
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2009–2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2009-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2009-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
As the adverse impacts of hydrological extremes increase in many regions of the world, a better understanding of the drivers of changes in risk and impacts is essential for effective flood and drought risk management. We present a dataset containing data of paired events, i.e. two floods or two droughts that occurred in the same area. The dataset enables comparative analyses and allows detailed context-specific assessments. Additionally, it supports the testing of socio-hydrological models.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Jens A. de Bruijn, Mikhail Smilovic, Peter Burek, Luca Guillaumot, Yoshihide Wada, and Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2437–2454, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2437-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2437-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present a computer simulation model of the hydrological system and human system, which can simulate the behaviour of individual farmers and their interactions with the water system at basin scale to assess how the systems have evolved and are projected to evolve in the future. For example, we can simulate the effect of subsidies provided on investment in adaptation measures and subsequent effects in the hydrological system, such as a lowering of the groundwater table or reservoir level.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Patrick Ludwig, Florian Ehmele, Mário J. Franca, Susanna Mohr, Alberto Caldas-Alvarez, James E. Daniell, Uwe Ehret, Hendrik Feldmann, Marie Hundhausen, Peter Knippertz, Katharina Küpfer, Michael Kunz, Bernhard Mühr, Joaquim G. Pinto, Julian Quinting, Andreas M. Schäfer, Frank Seidel, and Christina Wisotzky
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1287–1311, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1287-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1287-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Heavy precipitation in July 2021 led to widespread floods in western Germany and neighboring countries. The event was among the five heaviest precipitation events of the past 70 years in Germany, and the river discharges exceeded by far the statistical 100-year return values. Simulations of the event under future climate conditions revealed a strong and non-linear effect on flood peaks: for +2 K global warming, an 18 % increase in rainfall led to a 39 % increase of the flood peak in the Ahr river.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Raed Hamed, Sem Vijverberg, Anne F. Van Loon, Jeroen Aerts, and Dim Coumou
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 255–272, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-255-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-255-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Spatially compounding soy harvest failures can have important global impacts. Using causal networks, we show that soy yields are predominately driven by summer soil moisture conditions in North and South America. Summer soil moisture is affected by antecedent soil moisture and by remote extra-tropical SST patterns in both hemispheres. Both of these soil moisture drivers are again influenced by ENSO. Our results highlight physical pathways by which ENSO can drive spatially compounding impacts.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Dirk Eilander, Anaïs Couasnon, Tim Leijnse, Hiroaki Ikeuchi, Dai Yamazaki, Sanne Muis, Job Dullaart, Arjen Haag, Hessel C. Winsemius, and Philip J. Ward
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 823–846, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-823-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-823-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In coastal deltas, flooding can occur from interactions between coastal, riverine, and pluvial drivers, so-called compound flooding. Global models however ignore these interactions. We present a framework for automated and reproducible compound flood modeling anywhere globally and validate it for two historical events in Mozambique with good results. The analysis reveals differences in compound flood dynamics between both events related to the magnitude of and time lag between drivers.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Susanna Mohr, Uwe Ehret, Michael Kunz, Patrick Ludwig, Alberto Caldas-Alvarez, James E. Daniell, Florian Ehmele, Hendrik Feldmann, Mário J. Franca, Christian Gattke, Marie Hundhausen, Peter Knippertz, Katharina Küpfer, Bernhard Mühr, Joaquim G. Pinto, Julian Quinting, Andreas M. Schäfer, Marc Scheibel, Frank Seidel, and Christina Wisotzky
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 525–551, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-525-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-525-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The flood event in July 2021 was one of the most severe disasters in Europe in the last half century. The objective of this two-part study is a multi-disciplinary assessment that examines the complex process interactions in different compartments, from meteorology to hydrological conditions to hydro-morphological processes to impacts on assets and environment. In addition, we address the question of what measures are possible to generate added value to early response management.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Paolo Scussolini, Job Dullaart, Sanne Muis, Alessio Rovere, Pepijn Bakker, Dim Coumou, Hans Renssen, Philip J. Ward, and Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
Clim. Past, 19, 141–157, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-141-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-141-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We reconstruct sea level extremes due to storm surges in a past warmer climate. We employ a novel combination of paleoclimate modeling and global ocean hydrodynamic modeling. We find that during the Last Interglacial, about 127 000 years ago, seasonal sea level extremes were indeed significantly different – higher or lower – on long stretches of the global coast. These changes are associated with different patterns of atmospheric storminess linked with meridional shifts in wind bands.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Weihua Zhu, Kai Liu, Ming Wang, Philip J. Ward, and Elco E. Koks
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1519–1540, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1519-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1519-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present a simulation framework to analyse the system vulnerability and risk of the Chinese railway system to floods. To do so, we develop a method for generating flood events at both the national and river basin scale. Results show flood system vulnerability and risk of the railway system are spatially heterogeneous. The event-based approach shows how we can identify critical hotspots, taking the first steps in developing climate-resilient infrastructure.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Philip J. Ward, James Daniell, Melanie Duncan, Anna Dunne, Cédric Hananel, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler, Annegien Tijssen, Silvia Torresan, Roxana Ciurean, Joel C. Gill, Jana Sillmann, Anaïs Couasnon, Elco Koks, Noemi Padrón-Fumero, Sharon Tatman, Marianne Tronstad Lund, Adewole Adesiyun, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, Alexander Alabaster, Bernard Bulder, Carlos Campillo Torres, Andrea Critto, Raúl Hernández-Martín, Marta Machado, Jaroslav Mysiak, Rene Orth, Irene Palomino Antolín, Eva-Cristina Petrescu, Markus Reichstein, Timothy Tiggeloven, Anne F. Van Loon, Hung Vuong Pham, and Marleen C. de Ruiter
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1487–1497, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1487-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1487-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The majority of natural-hazard risk research focuses on single hazards (a flood, a drought, a volcanic eruption, an earthquake, etc.). In the international research and policy community it is recognised that risk management could benefit from a more systemic approach. In this perspective paper, we argue for an approach that addresses multi-hazard, multi-risk management through the lens of sustainability challenges that cut across sectors, regions, and hazards.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Marthe L. K. Wens, Anne F. van Loon, Ted I. E. Veldkamp, and Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1201–1232, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1201-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1201-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we present an application of the empirically calibrated drought risk adaptation model ADOPT for the case of smallholder farmers in the Kenyan drylands. ADOPT is used to evaluate the effect of various top-down drought risk reduction interventions (extension services, early warning systems, ex ante cash transfers, and low credit rates) on individual and community drought risk (adaptation levels, food insecurity, poverty, emergency aid) under different climate change scenarios.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Raed Hamed, Anne F. Van Loon, Jeroen Aerts, and Dim Coumou
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 1371–1391, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1371-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1371-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Soy yields in the US are affected by climate variability. We identify the main within-season climate drivers and highlight potential compound events and associated agricultural impacts. Our results show that soy yields are most negatively influenced by the combination of high temperature and low soil moisture during the summer crop reproductive period. Furthermore, we highlight the role of temperature and moisture coupling across the year in generating these hot–dry extremes and linked impacts.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Lucas Wouters, Anaïs Couasnon, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Marc J. C. van den Homberg, Aklilu Teklesadik, and Hans de Moel
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3199–3218, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3199-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3199-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This research introduces a novel approach to estimate flood damage in Malawi by applying a machine learning model to UAV imagery. We think that the development of such a model is an essential step to enable the swift allocation of resources for recovery by humanitarian decision-makers. By comparing this method (EUR 10 140) to a conventional land-use-based approach (EUR 15 782) for a specific flood event, recommendations are made for future assessments.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Danhua Xin, James Edward Daniell, Hing-Ho Tsang, and Friedemann Wenzel
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3031–3056, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3031-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3031-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A grid-level residential building stock model (in terms of floor area and replacement value) targeted for seismic risk analysis for mainland China is developed by using census and population density data. Comparisons with previous studies and yearbook records indicate the reliability of our model. The modelled results are openly accessible and can be conveniently updated when more detailed census or statistics data are available.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Dirk Eilander, Willem van Verseveld, Dai Yamazaki, Albrecht Weerts, Hessel C. Winsemius, and Philip J. Ward
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5287–5313, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5287-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5287-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Digital elevation models and derived flow directions are crucial to distributed hydrological modeling. As the spatial resolution of models is typically coarser than these data, we need methods to upscale flow direction data while preserving the river structure. We propose the Iterative Hydrography Upscaling (IHU) method and show it outperforms other often-applied methods. We publish the multi-resolution MERIT Hydro IHU hydrography dataset and the algorithm as part of the pyflwdir Python package.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Cited articles
Adger, W. N.: Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam,World Dev., 27, 249–269, 1999.
Adger, W. N.: Vulnerability, Global Environ. Chang., 16, 268–281, 2006.
Akukwe, T. I. and Ogbodo, C.: Spatial Analysis of Vulnerability to Flooding in Port Harcourt Metropolis, Nigeria, SAGE Open, 5, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015575558, 2015.
Alexander, D.: The study of natural disasters, 1977–97: Some reflections on a changing field of knowledge, Disasters, 21, 284–304, 1997.
Apel, H., Thieken, A. H., Merz, B., and Blöschl, G.: Flood risk assessment and associated uncertainty, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 295–308, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-4-295-2004, 2004.
Apel, H., Aronica, G. T., Kreibich, H., and Thieken, A. H.: Flood risk analyses – how detailed do we need to be?, Nat. Hazards, 49, 79–98, 2009.
Ara, S.: Analyzing population distribution and its effect on earthquake loss estimation in Sylhet, Bangladesh, Applied Earth Science Faculty of Geoinformation Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands, 2013.
Ashley, R. M., Blanksby, J., Chapman, J., and Zhou, J.: Towards integrated approaches to reduce flood risk in urban areas, Advances in urban flood management, 415–432, ISBN: 0-203-94598-0, 2007.
Atzl, A. and Keller, S.: A systemic approach for the analysis of infrastructure-specific social vulnerability, From Social Vulnerability to Resilience: Measuring Progress towards Disaster Risk Reduction, SOURCE No. 17, 27–43, 2013.
Balica, S. and Wright, N. G.: Reducing the complexity of the flood vulnerability index, Environmal Hazards, 9, 321–339, 2010.
Balica, S. F., Douben, N., and Wright, N. G.: Flood vulnerability indices at varying spatial scales, Water Sci. Technol., 60, 2571–2580, https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.183, 2009.
Balica, S. F., Wright, N. G., and van der Meulen, F.: A flood vulnerability index for coastal cities and its use in assessing climate change impacts, Nat. Hazards, 64, 73–105, 2012.
Barroca, B., Bernardara, P., Mouchel, J. M., and Hubert, G.: Indicators for identification of urban flooding vulnerability, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 553–561, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-6-553-2006, 2006.
Barroca, B., Mouchel, J. M., Bonierbale, T., and Hubert, G.: Flood Vulnerability Assessment Tool (FVAT), Daywater: An Adaptive Decision Support System for Urban Stormwater Management, 123, 2008.
Birkmann, J.: Risk and vulnerability indicators at different scales: applicability, usefulness and policy implications, Environmental Hazards, 7, 20–31, 2007.
Birkmann, J. and Wisner, B.: Measuring the unmeasurable: the challenge of vulnerability, UNU-EHS, 2006.
Birkmann, J., Cardona, O. D., Carreño, M. L., Barbat, A. H., Pelling, M., Schneiderbauer, S., Kienberger, S., Keiler, M., Alexander, D., Zeil, P., and Welle, T.: Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework, Nat. Hazards, 67, 193–211, 2013.
Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., and Wisner, B.: At risk: natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters, Routledge, 2014.
Bommer, J., Spence, R., Erdik, M., Tabuchi, S., Aydinoglu, N., Booth, E., Del Re, D., and Peterken, O.: Development of an earthquake loss model for Turkish catastrophe insurance, J. Seismol., 6, 431–446, 2002.
Botzen, W. J. and Van Den Bergh, J. C.: Monetary valuation of insurance against flood risk under climate change, Int. Econ. Rev., 53, 1005–1026, 2012.
Bouwer, L. M.: Have disaster losses increased due to anthropogenic climate change?, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 92, 39–46, 2011.
Bouwer, L. M., Crompton, R. P., Faust, E., Höppe, P., and Pielke Jr., R. A.: Confronting disaster losses. Science-New York then Washington, 318(5851), 753, 2007.
Bruneau, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O'Rourke, T. D., Reinhorn, A. M., Shinozuka, M., Tierney, K., Wallace, W. A., and Von Winterfeldt, D.: A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities, Earthq. Spectra, 19, 733–752, 2003.
Brzev, S., Scawthorn, C., Charleson, A. W., Allen, L., Greene, M., Jaiswal, K., and Silva, V.: GEM Building Taxonomy (Version 2.0) (No. 2013-02), GEM Foundation, 2013.
Brink, S. A. and Davidson, R. A.: Framework for Comprehensive Assessment of a City's Natural Disaster Risk, Earthq. Spectra, 31, 1931–1947, 2015.
Bubeck, P., Botzen, W. J., and Aerts, J. C.: A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior, Risk Anal., 32, 1481–1495, 2012.
Burton, C. G. and Silva, V.: Integrated risk modelling within the Global Earthquake Model (GEM): test case application for Portugal, in: Proceedings of the second European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Istanbul, Turkey, 2014.
Calvi, G. M., Pinho, R., Magenes, G., Bommer, J. J., Restrepo-Vélez, L. F., and Crowley, H.: Development of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies over the past 30 years, ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, 43, 75–104, 2006.
Cardona, O. D.: The need for rethinking the concepts of vulnerability and risk from a holistic perspective: a necessary review and criticism for effective risk management, Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development and people, 17, 2004.
Cardona, O. D.: A system of indicators for disaster risk management in the Americas, Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards–Towards Disaster Resilient Societies, 2006.
Cardona, O. D. and Carreño, M. L.: Updating the indicators of disaster risk and risk management for the Americas, IDRiM Journal, 1, 27–47, 2011.
Carreño, M. L., Cardona, O. D., and Barbat, A. H.: Urban seismic risk evaluation: a holistic approach, Nat. Hazards, 40, 137–172, 2007.
Carreño, M. L., Cardona, O. D., and Barbat, A. H.: New methodology for urban seismic risk assessment from a holistic perspective, B. Earthq. Eng., 10, 547–565, 2012.
Chang, S. E., Gregorian, M., Pathman, K., Yumagulova, L., and Tse, W.: Urban growth and long-term changes in natural hazard risk, Environ. Plann. A, 44, 989–1008, 2012.
Chang, S. E., Yip, J. Z., de Jong, S. L. V. Z., Chaster, R., and Lowcock, A.: Using vulnerability indicators to develop resilience networks: a similarity approach, Nat. Hazards, 78, 1827–1841, 2015.
Coburn, A. and Spence, R.: Earthquake protection, 2nd Edn., Wiley, Chichester, England, 2002.
Coburn, A. W., Spence, R. J. S., and Pomonis, A.: Vulnerability and risk assessment, Disaster Management Training Programme, UNDP, 2nd Edn., 1994.
Cochrane, S. W. and Schaad, W. H.: Assessment of earthquake vulnerability of buildings, Tenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 1, 497–502, 1992.
Colombi, M., Borzi, B., Crowley, H., Onida, M., Meroni, F., and Pinho, R.: Deriving vulnerability curves using Italian earthquake damage data, B. Earthq. Eng., 6, 485–504, 2008.
Comfort, L., Wisner, B., Cutter, S., Pulwarty, R., Hewitt, K., Oliver-Smith, A., Wiener, J., Fordham, M., Peacock, W., and Krimgold, F.: Reframing Disaster Policy: The Global Evolution of Vulnerable Communities, Environmental Hazards, 1, 39–44, 1999.
Connor, R. and Hiroki, K.: Development of a method for assessing flood vulnerability, Water Sci. Technol., 51, 61–67, 2005.
Crichton, D.: The risk triangle, in: Natural Disaster Management, edited by: Ingleton, J., Tudor Rose, London, 102–103, 1999.
Cutter, S. L. and Emrich, C.: Are natural hazards and disaster losses in the US increasing?, EOS Transactions American Geophysical Union, 86, 381–389, 2005.
Cutter, S. L., Holm, D., and Clark, L.: The role of geographic scale in monitoring environmental justice, Risk Anal., 16, 517–526, 1996.
Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., and Shirley, W. L.: Social vulnerability to environmental hazards, Soc. Sci. Quart., 84, 242–261, 2003.
Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., and Webb, J.: A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters, Global Environ. Chang., 18, 598–606, 2008.
Damm, M.: Mapping Social-Ecological Vulnerability to Flooding-a sub-national approach for Germany, PhD thesis, Universitäts-und Landesbibliothek Bonn, Bonn, 2009.
Daniell, J. E.: Open source Procedure for Assessment of Loss using Global Earthquake Modelling–OPAL-GEM Project, CEDIM Research Report 09-01, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2009.
Daniell, J. E.: Open Source Procedure for Assessment of Loss using Global Earthquake Modelling software (OPAL), Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 1885–1899, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-1885-2011, 2011.
Daniell, J. E.: Development of socio-economic fragility functions for use in worldwide rapid earthquake loss estimation procedures, PhD thesis, Karlsruhe University, Karlsruhe, 2014.
Daniell, J. E.: Global View of Seismic Code and Building Practice Factors, in: Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1109–1119, 2015.
Daniell, J. E. and Vervaeck, A.: CEDIM earthquake loss estimation series research report 2012-01, Karlsruhe, CEDIM, 2012.
Daniell, J. E., Daniell, K. A., Daniell, T. M., and Khazai, B.: A country level physical and community risk index in the Asia-Pacific region for earthquakes and floods, 5th Civil Engineering Conference in the Asian Region and Australasian Structural Engineering Conference 2010, Engineers Australia, p. 610, 2010.
Daniell, J. E., Khazai, B., Wenzel, F., and Vervaeck, A.: The CATDAT damaging earthquakes database, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 2235–2251, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-2235-2011, 2011.
Daniell, J. E., Wenzel, F., and Khazai, B.: The Normalisation of socio-economic losses from historic worldwide earthquakes from 1900 to 2012, 15th World Congress on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, 2012.
Davidson, R. A. and Shah, H. C.: An urban earthquake disaster risk index, Standford University, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, 1997.
Dawson, R. J., Peppe, R., and Wang, M.: An agent-based model for risk-based flood incident management, Nat. Hazards, 59, 167–189, 2011.
De León, V. and Carlos, J.: Vulnerability: a conceptional and methodological review, UNU-EHS, Bonn, 2006.
de Moel, H. D., van Vliet, M., and Aerts, J. C.: Evaluating the effect of flood damage-reducing measures: a case study of the unembanked area of Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Reg. Environ. Change, 14, 895–908, 2014.
de Moel, H. D., Jongman, B., Kreibich, H., Merz, B., Penning-Rowsell, E., and Ward, P. J.: Flood risk assessments at different spatial scales, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20, 865–890, 2015.
Deressa, T. T., Hassan, R. M., Ringler, C., Alemu, T., and Yesuf, M.: Analysis of the determinants of farmers' choice of adaptation methods and perceptions of climate change in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia [in Amharic] (No. 15 (9) AMH), International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), 2008.
Dell'Acqua, F., Gamba, P., and Jaiswal, K.: Spatial aspects of building and population exposure data and their implications for global earthquake exposure modeling, Nat. Hazards, 68, 1291–1309, 2013.
de Sherbinin, A. and Bardy, G.: Social vulnerability to floods in two coastal megacities: New York City and Mumbai, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 131–165, 2015.
Dewan, A. M.: Floods in a megacity: geospatial techniques in assessing hazards, risk and vulnerability, Springer, Dordrecht, 2013.
Doğangün, A., Tuluk, Ö. İ., Livaoğlu, R., and Acar, R.: Traditional wooden buildings and their damages during earthquakes in Turkey, Eng. Fail. Anal., 13, 981–996, 2006.
Doocy, S., Daniels, A., Packer, C., Dick, A., and Kirsch, T. D.: The human impact of earthquakes: a historical review of events 1980–2009 and systematic literature review, PLoS Currents, 5, https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis, 2013.
Douglas, J.: Physical vulnerability modelling in natural hazard risk assessment, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 7, 283–288, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-7-283-2007, 2007.
Duzgun, H. S. B., Yucemen, M. S., Kalaycioglu, H. S., Celik, K., Kemec, S., Ertugay, K., and Deniz, A.: An integrated earthquake vulnerability assessment framework for urban areas, Nat. Hazards, 59, 917, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9808-6, 2011.
Faccioli, E., Pessina, V., Calvi, G. M., and Borzi, B.: A study on damage scenarios for residential buildings in Catania city, J. Seismol., 3, 327–343, 1999.
Fekete, A.: Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 393–403, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-393-2009, 2009.
Fekete, A., Damm, M., and Birkmann, J.: Scales as a challenge for vulnerability assessment, Nat. Hazards, 55, 729–747, 2010.
FEMA: Multi-Hazard Loss Estimation Methodology: Earthquake Model Technical Manual, Department of Homeland Security, FEMA, Washington, DC, 2013a.
FEMA: Multi-Hazard Loss Estimation Methodology: Flood Model Technical Manual, Department of Homeland Security, FEMA, Washington, DC, 2013b.
Ferreira, S., Hamilton, K., and Vincent, J. R.: Nature, socioeconomics and adaptation to natural disasters: new evidence from floods, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, 2011.
Fuchs, S.: Susceptibility versus resilience to mountain hazards in Austria – paradigms of vulnerability revisited, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 337–352, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-337-2009, 2009.
GEM: https://www.globalquakemodel.org, last access: 25 October 2016.
GFDRR: The making of a riskier future: How our decisions are shaping future disaster risk, Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, The World Bank, Washington, DC, 2016.
Giovinazzi, S. and Lagomarsino, S.: A macroseismic method for the vulnerability assessment of buildings, 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1–6, 2004.
Gunasekera, R., Ishizawa, O., Aubrecht, C., Blankespoor, B., Murray, S., Pomonis, A., and Daniell, J.: Developing an adaptive global exposure model to support the generation of country disaster risk profiles, Earth-Sci. Rev., 150, 594–608, 2015.
Hahn, H.: Indicators and other instruments for local risk management for communities and local governments. Document prepared as part of the documents related to the project: local risk management for communities and local governments, The German Technical Cooperation Agency, GTZ, for IADB, 2003.
Hall, J. W., Sayers, P. B., and Dawson, R. J.: National-scale assessment of current and future flood risk in England and Wales, Nat. Hazards, 36, 147–164, 2005.
Hiete, M. and Merz, M.: An indicator framework to assess the vulnerability of industrial sectors against indirect disaster losses, International ISCRAM Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2009.
Hinkel, J.: “Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity”: Towards a clarification of the science–policy interface, Global Environ. Chang., 21, 198–208, 2011.
Holand, I. S.: Lifeline issue in social vulnerability indexing: A review of indicators and discussion of indicator application, Nat. Hazards Review, 16, 04014026-1–04014026-12, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000148, 2014.
Hollenstein, K.: Reconsidering the risk assessment concept: Standardizing the impact description as a building block for vulnerability assessment, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 301–307, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-5-301-2005, 2005.
Huizinga, H. J.: Flood damage functions for EU member states, HKV Lijn in water, Lelystad, the Netherlands, 2007.
IPCC: Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012.
Jaiswal, K. S. and Wald, D. J.: Developing a global building inventory for earthquake loss assessment and risk management, Proc. 14th World Conf. Earthq. Eng., Beijing, China (Vol. 8), 2008.
Jaiswal, K. S., Wald, D. J., Earle, P. S., Porter, K. A., and Hearne, M.: Earthquake casualty models within the USGS Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response (PAGER) system, in: Human Casualties in Earthquakes, Springer, the Netherlands, 83–94 2011.
Jongman, B., Kreibich, H., Apel, H., Barredo, J. I., Bates, P. D., Feyen, L., Gericke, A., Neal, J., Aerts, J. C. J. H., and Ward, P. J.: Comparative flood damage model assessment: towards a European approach, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 3733–3752, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3733-2012, 2012.
Jongman, B., Winsemius, H. C., Aerts, J. C., de Perez, E. C., van Aalst, M. K., Kron, W., and Ward, P. J.: Declining vulnerability to river floods and the global benefits of adaptation, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, E2271–E2280, 2015.
Kannami, Y.: Establishment of a country-based flood risk index, MS thesis, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, 2008.
Keller, S., and Atzl, A.: Mapping Natural Hazard Impacts on Road Infrastructure – The Extreme Precipitation in Baden-Württemberg, Germany, June 2013, International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 5, 227–241, 2014.
Khazai, B., Merz, M., Schulz, C., and Borst, D.: An integrated indicator framework for spatial assessment of industrial and social vulnerability to indirect disaster losses, Nat. Hazards, 67, 145–167, 2013.
Khazai, B., Burton, C. G., Tormene, P., Power, C., Bernasocchi, M., Daniell, J. E., and Wyss, B.: Integrated risk modelling toolkit and database for earthquake risk assessment, Proceedings of the second European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Istanbul, Turkey, 2014a.
Khazai, B., Daniell, J. E., Düzgün, Ş., Kunz-Plapp, T., and Wenzel, F.: Framework for systemic socio-economic vulnerability and loss assessment, in: SYNER-G: Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Assessment of Complex Urban, Utility, Lifeline Systems and Critical Facilities, Springer, the Netherlands, 89–130, 2014b.
Kienberger, S., Lang, S., and Zeil, P.: Spatial vulnerability units – expert-based spatial modelling of socio-economic vulnerability in the Salzach catchment, Austria, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 767–778, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-767-2009, 2009.
Kircher, C. A., Nassar, A. A., Kustu, O. and Holmes, W. T.: Development of building damage functions for earthquake loss estimation, Earthq. Spectra, 13, 663–682, 1997.
Kircher, C. A., Whitman, R. V., and Holmes, W. T.: HAZUS earthquake loss estimation methods, Natural Hazards Review, 7, 45–59, 2006.
Klijn, F., Baan, P. J. A., De Bruijn, K. M., and Kwadijk, J.: Overstromingsrisico's in Nederland in een veranderend klimaat, WL | delft hydraulics, the Netherlands, Delft, Q4290, 2007.
Koks, E. E., Bočkarjova, M., Moel, H., and Aerts, J. C. J. H.: Integrated direct and indirect flood risk modeling: development and sensitivity analysis, Risk Anal., 35, 882–900, 2015a.
Koks, E. E., Jongman, B., Husby, T. G., and Botzen, W. J. W.: Combining hazard, exposure and social vulnerability to provide lessons for flood risk management, Environ. Sci. Policy, 47, 42–52, 2015b.
Kreibich, H. and Thieken, A. H.: Coping with floods in the city of Dresden, Germany. Nat. Hazards, 51, 423–436, 2009.
Kreibich, H., Thieken, A. H., Petrow, Th., Müller, M., and Merz, B.: Flood loss reduction of private households due to building precautionary measures – lessons learned from the Elbe flood in August 2002, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 117–126, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-5-117-2005, 2005.
Kreibich, H., Bubeck, P., Van Vliet, M., and De Moel, H.: A review of damage-reducing measures to manage fluvial flood risks in a changing climate, Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change, 20, 967–989, 2015.
Kron, W.: Flood risk = hazard ⋅ values ⋅ vulnerability, Water Int., 30, 58–68, 2005.
Kundzewicz, Z. W., Kanae, S., Seneviratne, S. I., Handmer, J., Nicholls, N., Peduzzi, P., Mechler, R., Bouwer, L. M., Arnell, N., Mach, K., and Muir-Wood, R.: Flood risk and climate change: global and regional perspectives, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 59, 1–28, 2014.
Lagomarsino, S. and Giovinazzi, S.: Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings, B. Earthq. Eng., 4, 415–443, 2006.
Lindell, M. K. and Perry, R. W.: Behavioral foundations of community emergency planning, Hemisphere Publishing Corp., 1992.
Loh, C. H., Lawson, R. S., and Dong, W. M.: Development of a national earthquake risk assessment model for Taiwan, The 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, paper (No. 0380), 2000.
Lomnitz, C.: Casualties and behavior of populations during earthquakes, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 60, 1309–1313, 1970.
Marulanda, M. C., Carreno, M. L., Cardona, O. D., Ordaz, M. G., and Barbat, A. H.: Probabilistic earthquake risk assessment using CAPRA: application to the city of Barcelona, Spain, Nat. Hazards, 69, 59–84, 2013.
McEntire, D. A.: Why vulnerability matters: Exploring the merit of an inclusive disaster reduction concept, Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 14, 206–222, 2005.
Mechler, R. and Bouwer, L. M.: Understanding trends and projections of disaster losses and climate change: is vulnerability the missing link?, Climatic Change, 133, 23–35, 2014.
Menoni, S. and Pergalani, F.: An attempt to link risk assessment with land use planning: a recent experience in Italy, Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 5, 6–21, 1996.
Menoni, S., Pergalani, F., Boni, M. P., and Petrini, V.: Lifelines earthquake vulnerability assessment: a systemic approach, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 22, 1199–1208, 2002.
Menoni, S., Pergalani, F., Boni, M. P., and Petrini, V.: Lifeline earthquake vulnerability assessment, Managing Critical Infrastructure Risks, Springer, the Netherlands, 111–132, 2007.
Mercer, J.: Disaster risk reduction or climate change adaptation: are we reinventing the wheel?, Journal of International Development, 22, 247–264, 2010.
Merz, B., Kreibich, H., Schwarze, R., and Thieken, A.: Review article “Assessment of economic flood damage”, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 1697–1724, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-1697-2010, 2010.
Merz, B., Kreibich, H., and Lall, U.: Multi-variate flood damage assessment: a tree-based data-mining approach, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 53–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-53-2013, 2013.
Messner, F. and Meyer, V.: Flood damage, vulnerability and risk perception–challenges for flood damage research, Springer, the Netherlands, 149–167, 2006.
Messner, F., Penning-Rowsell, E., Green, C., Meyer, V., Tunstall, S., van der and Veen, A.: Evaluating flood damages: guidance and recommendations on principles and methods. FLOODsite Consortium, Wallingford, UK 2007.
Meyer, V. and Messner, F.: National flood damage evaluation methods: A review of applied methods in England, the Netherlands, the Czech Republik and Germany (No. 21/2005), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS), 2005.
Mileti, D.: Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Joseph Henry Press. Washington, D.C., 1999.
Molina, S., Lang, D. H., Lindholm, C. D., and Lingvall, F.: User manual for the earthquake loss estimation tool: SELENA, NORSAR and Universidad de Alicante, 2010.
Müller, M. and Thieken, A.: Elementartarife könnten weiter differenziert werden. Keller und Öltanks erhöhen das Schadenspotenzial–Untersuchung des Sommerhochwassers 2002, Versicherungswirtschaft, 2, 145–148, 2005.
Munich Re: NatCat SERVICE Database Munich, Munich Reinsurance Company, Munich, Germany, 2014.
Mysiak, J., Surminski, S., Thieken, A., Mechler, R., and Aerts, J.: Brief communication: Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction – success or warning sign for Paris?, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2189–2193, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2189-2016, 2016.
Nakamura, Y. and Saita, J.: UrEDAS, the earthquake warning system: Today and tomorrow, in: Earthquake Early Warning Systems, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 249–281, 2007.
Nasiri, H. and Shahmohammadi-Kalalagh, S.: Flood vulnerability index as a knowledge base for flood risk assessment in urban area, Journal of Novel Applied Science, 2, 269–272, 2013.
Nastev, M. and Todorov, N.: Hazus: A standardized methodology for flood risk assessment in Canada, Canadian Water Resour. J., 38, 223–231, 2013.
Naumann, T., Nikolowski, J., Golz, S., and Schinke, R.: Resilience and Resistance of Buildings and Built Structures to Flood Impacts–Approaches to Analysis and Evaluation. In German Annual of Spatial Research and Policy 2010 Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 89–100, 2011.
Nikolowski, J.: Wohngebäude im Klimawandel–Verletzbarkeit und Anpassung am Beispiel von Überflutung und Starkregen, Dresden: Technische Universität, Fakultät Bauingenieurwesen, Institut für Baukonstruktion, PhD thesis, 2014.
Notaro, V., De Marchis, M., Fontanazza, C. M., La Loggia, G., Puleo, V., and Freni, G.: The effect of damage functions on urban flood damage appraisal, Procedia Engineering, 70, 1251–1260, 2014.
Papathoma-Köhle, M., Kappes, M., Keiler, M., and Glade, T.: Physical vulnerability assessment for alpine hazards: state of the art and future needs, Nat. Hazards, 58, 645–680, 2011.
Peduzzi, P., Dao, H., Herold, C., and Mouton, F.: Assessing global exposure and vulnerability towards natural hazards: the Disaster Risk Index, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 1149–1159, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-1149-2009, 2009.
Peng, Y.: Regional earthquake vulnerability assessment using a combination of MCDM methods, Ann. Oper. Res., 234, 95–110, 2015.
Penning-Rowsell, E., Viavattene, C., Parode, J., Chatterton, J., Parker, D., and Morris, J.: The Benefits of Flood and Coastal Risk Management: a Handbook of Assessment Techniques-2010 (Multi-Coloured Manual), FHRC, London (book+CD-ROM with damage data), 2010.
Pescaroli, G. and Alexander, D.: Critical infrastructure, panarchies and the vulnerability paths of cascading disasters, Nat. Hazards, 82, 175–192, 2016.
Pielke Jr., R. A. and Downton, M. W.: Precipitation and damaging floods: trends in the United States, 1932–97, J. Climate, 13, 3625–3637, 2000.
Pitilakis, K., Franchin, P., Khazai, B., and Wenzel, H. (Eds.).: SYNER-G: Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Assessment of Complex Urban, Utility, Lifeline Systems and Critical Facilities: Methodology and Applications, Vol. 31, Springer, 2014.
Porter, K. A., Jaiswal, K. S., Wald, D. J., Greene, M., and Comartin, C.: WHE-PAGER Project: a new initiative in estimating global building inventory and its seismic vulnerability, Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2008.
Poussin, J. K., Bubeck, P., Aerts, J. C. J. H., and Ward, P. J.: Potential of semi-structural and non-structural adaptation strategies to reduce future flood risk: case study for the Meuse, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 3455–3471, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3455-2012, 2012.
Pregnolato, M., Galasso, C., and Parisi, F.: A Compendium of Existing Vulnerability and Fragility Relationships for Flood: Preliminary Results, International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP), 2015.
Rashed, T. and Weeks, J.: Assessing vulnerability to earthquake hazards through spatial multicriteria analysis of urban areas, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 17, 547–576, 2003.
Rashed, T., Weeks, J., Couclelis, H., and Herold, M.: An integrative GIS and remote sensing model for place-based urban vulnerability analysis, Integration of GIS and remote sensing, Wiley, Chichester, 199–224, 2007.
Remo, J. W. and Pinter, N.: Hazus-MH earthquake modeling in the central USA, Nat. Hazards, 63, 1055–1081, 2012.
Roberts, N. J., Nadim, F., and Kalsnes, B.: Quantification of vulnerability to natural hazards, Georisk, 3, 164–173, 2009.
Robinson, D., Fulford, G., and Dhu, T.: EQRM: Geoscience Australia's Earthquake Risk Model, Technical Manual Version 3.0, Geoscience Australia, Canberra, Australia, 2006.
Rojas, R., Feyen, L., and Watkiss, P.: Climate change and river floods in the European Union: Socio-economic consequences and the costs and benefits of adaptation, Global Environ. Chang., 23, 1737–1751, 2013.
Roos, W.: Damage to buildings, Delft Cluster, 2003.
Rose, A., Benavides, J., Chang, S. E., Szczesniak, P., and Lim, D.: The regional economic impact of an earthquake: Direct and indirect effects of electricity lifeline disruptions, J. Regional Sci., 37, 437–458, 1997.
Rossetto, T. and Elnashai, A.: Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data, Eng. Struct., 25, 1241–1263, 2003.
Rufat, S., Tate, E., Burton, C. G., and Maroof, A. S.: Social vulnerability to floods: Review of case studies and implications for measurement, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 14, 470–486, 2015.
Rüstemli, A. and Karanci, A. N.: Correlates of earthquake cognitions and preparedness behavior in a victimized population, J. Soc. Psychol., 139, 91–101, 1999.
Sauter, F. and Shah, H. C.: Studies on earthquake insurance. In Proceedings of the Central American Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 2, 265–271, 1978.
Scawthorn, C., Flores, P., Blais, N., Seligson, H., Tate, E., Chang, S., Mifflin, E., Thomas, W., Murphy, J., Jones, C., and Lawrence, M.: HAZUS-MH Flood Loss Estimation Methodology – I: Overview and Flood Hazard Characterization, Natural Hazards Review, 7, 60–71, 2006a.
Scawthorn, C., Flores, P., Blais, N., Seligson, H., Tate, E., Chang, S., Mifflin, E., Thomas, W., Murphy, J., Jones, C., and Lawrence, M.: HAZUS-MH flood loss estimation methodology. II. Damage and loss assessment, Natural Hazards Review, 7, 72–81, 2006b.
Scheuer, S., Haase, D., and Meyer, V.: Exploring multicriteria flood vulnerability by integrating economic, social and ecological dimensions of flood risk and coping capacity: from a starting point view towards an end point view of vulnerability, Nat. Hazards, 58, 731–751, 2011.
Schmidtlein, M. C., Deutsch, R. C., Piegorsch, W. W., and Cutter, S. L.: A sensitivity analysis of the social vulnerability index, Risk Anal., 28, 1099–1114, 2008.
Schmidtlein, M. C., Shafer, J. M., Berry, M., and Cutter, S. L.: Modeled earthquake losses and social vulnerability in Charleston, South Carolina, Appl. Geogr., 31, 269–281, 2011.
Shaw, R., Shiwaku Hirohide Kobayashi, K., and Kobayashi, M.: Linking experience, education, perception and earthquake preparedness, Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 13, 39–49, 2004.
Silva, V., Crowley, H., Pagani, M., Monelli, D., and Pinho, R.: Development of the OpenQuake engine, the Global Earthquake Model's open-source software for seismic risk assessment, Nat. Hazards, 72, 1409–1427, 2014a.
Silva, V., Crowley, H., Yepes, C., and Pinho, R.: Presentation of the OpenQuake-engine, an open source software for seismic hazard and risk assessment, Proceedings of the 10th US National conference on earthquake engineering, Anchorage, Alaska, 2014b.
Spence, R., So, E., Jenny, S., Castella, H., Ewald, M., and Booth, E.: The Global Earthquake Vulnerability Estimation System (GEVES): an approach for earthquake risk assessment for insurance applications, B. Earthq. Eng., 6, 463–483, 2008.
Steimen, S., Fäh, D., Giardini, D., Bertogg, M., and Tschudi, S.: Reliability of building inventories in seismic prone regions, B. Earthq. Eng., 2, 361–388, 2004.
Tapsell, S. M., Penning-Rowsell, E. C., Tunstall, S. M., and Wilson, T. L.: Vulnerability to flooding: health and social dimensions, Philos. T. R. S. A, 360, 1511–1525, 2002.
Tate, E.: Social vulnerability indices: a comparative assessment using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis, Nat. Hazards, 63, 325–347, 2012.
Thieken, A. H., Ackermann, V., Elmer, F., Kreibich, H., Kuhlmann, B., Kunert, U., Maiwald, H., Merz, B., Müller, M., Piroth, K., and Schwarz, J.: Methods for the evaluation of direct and indirect flood losses, 4th international symposium on flood defense: managing flood risk, reliability and vulnerability, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 6–8, 2008.
Thomalla, F., Downing, T., Spanger-Siegfried, E., Han, G., and Rockström, J.: Reducing hazard vulnerability: towards a common approach between disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation, Disasters, 30, 39–48, 2006.
Tiedemann, H.: Earthquakes and volcanic eruptions: a handbook on risk assessment, Catalogue of Earthquakes and volcanic eruptions: this catalogue pertains to the world map of historical and instrumental earthquakes and of volcanoes and volcanic eruptions, Swiss Reinsurance Company, 1991.
Tierney, K. J. and Nigg, J. M.: Business vulnerability to disaster-related lifeline disruption, Disaster Research Center, Series/Report no.: Preliminary Papers, 223, 1995.
Turner, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Kasperson, J. X., Luers, A., Martello, M. L., and Polsky, C.: A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 8074–8079, 2003.
UNDP: A Challenge for Development. United Nations Development Programme, Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery, New York, United Nations Development Programme, Bureau for Crisis Prevention, and Recovery, Reducing Disaster Risk: A Challenge for Development-a Global Report, United Nations, 2004.
UNISDR: Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction: Risk and Poverty in a Changing Climate, Geneva, United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction Secretariat, 2009.
UNISDR: Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction: Revealing Risk, Redefining Development, Geneva, United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction Secretariat, 2011.
Van Der Veen, A. and Logtmeijer, C.: Economic hotspots: visualizing vulnerability to flooding, Nat. Hazards, 36, 65–80, 2005.
Ventura, C. E., Finn, W. L., Onur, T., Blanquera, A., and Rezai, M.: Regional seismic risk in British Columbia-classification of buildings and development of damage probability functions, Can. J. Civil Eng., 32, 372–387, 2005.
Visser, H., Petersen, A. C., and Ligtvoet, W.: On the relation between weather-related disaster impacts, vulnerability and climate change, Climatic Change, 125, 461–477, 2014.
Wald, D. J., Earle, P. S., Allen, T. I., Jaiswal, K., Porter, K., and Hearne, M.: Development of the US Geological Survey's PAGER system (prompt assessment of global earthquakes for response), Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, 2008.
Ward, P. J., Jongman, B., Weiland, F. S., Bouwman, A., van Beek, R., Bierkens, M. F., Ligtvoet, W., and Winsemius, H. C.: Assessing flood risk at the global scale: model setup, results, and sensitivity, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 044019, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044019, 2013.
Yücemen, M. S., Özcebe, G., and Pay, A. C.: Prediction of potential damage due to severe earthquakes, Struct. Saf., 26, 349–366, 2004.
Zahran, S., Brody, S. D., Peacock, W. G., Vedlitz, A., and Grover, H.: Social vulnerability and the natural and built environment: a model of flood casualties in Texas, Disasters, 32, 537–560, 2008.
Zevenbergen, C., Veerbeek, W., Gersonius, B., and Van Herk, S.: Challenges in urban flood management: travelling across spatial and temporal scales, Journal of Flood Risk Management, 1, 81–88, 2008.
Short summary
This study provides cross-discipline lessons for earthquake and flood vulnerability assessment methods by comparing indicators used in both fields. It appears that there is potential for improvement of these methods that can be obtained for both earthquake and flood vulnerability assessment indicators. This increased understanding is beneficial for both scientists as well as practitioners working with earthquake and/or flood vulnerability assessment methods.
This study provides cross-discipline lessons for earthquake and flood vulnerability assessment...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint