Journal cover Journal topic
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.102 IF 3.102
  • IF 5-year value: 3.284 IF 5-year
    3.284
  • CiteScore value: 5.1 CiteScore
    5.1
  • SNIP value: 1.37 SNIP 1.37
  • IPP value: 3.21 IPP 3.21
  • SJR value: 1.005 SJR 1.005
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 90 Scimago H
    index 90
  • h5-index value: 42 h5-index 42
Volume 17, issue 7
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1231–1251, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1231-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1231–1251, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1231-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Review article 20 Jul 2017

Review article | 20 Jul 2017

Review Article: A comparison of flood and earthquake vulnerability assessment indicators

Marleen C. de Ruiter et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by Editor and Referees) (10 May 2017) by Heidi Kreibich
AR by Svenja Lange on behalf of the Authors (23 May 2017)  Author's response
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (23 May 2017) by Heidi Kreibich
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (23 May 2017)
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (07 Jun 2017)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (further review by Editor) (12 Jun 2017) by Heidi Kreibich
AR by Anna Wenzel on behalf of the Authors (19 Jun 2017)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (19 Jun 2017) by Heidi Kreibich
Publications Copernicus
Short summary
This study provides cross-discipline lessons for earthquake and flood vulnerability assessment methods by comparing indicators used in both fields. It appears that there is potential for improvement of these methods that can be obtained for both earthquake and flood vulnerability assessment indicators. This increased understanding is beneficial for both scientists as well as practitioners working with earthquake and/or flood vulnerability assessment methods.
This study provides cross-discipline lessons for earthquake and flood vulnerability assessment...
Citation
Final-revised paper
Preprint