Articles | Volume 17, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1231-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1231-2017
Review article
 | 
20 Jul 2017
Review article |  | 20 Jul 2017

Review Article: A comparison of flood and earthquake vulnerability assessment indicators

Marleen C. de Ruiter, Philip J. Ward, James E. Daniell, and Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts

Viewed

Total article views: 6,690 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,682 2,864 144 6,690 102 134
  • HTML: 3,682
  • PDF: 2,864
  • XML: 144
  • Total: 6,690
  • BibTeX: 102
  • EndNote: 134
Views and downloads (calculated since 31 Jan 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 31 Jan 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 6,690 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 6,219 with geography defined and 471 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 22 Apr 2024
Short summary
This study provides cross-discipline lessons for earthquake and flood vulnerability assessment methods by comparing indicators used in both fields. It appears that there is potential for improvement of these methods that can be obtained for both earthquake and flood vulnerability assessment indicators. This increased understanding is beneficial for both scientists as well as practitioners working with earthquake and/or flood vulnerability assessment methods.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint