Articles | Volume 25, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3827-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.Could seismo-volcanic catalogs be improved or created using weakly supervised approaches with pre-trained systems?
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 08 Oct 2025)
- Preprint (discussion started on 17 Jun 2024)
- Supplement to the preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
RC1: 'Comment on nhess-2024-102', Gordon Woo, 27 Aug 2024
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Manuel Titos Luzon, 17 Oct 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on nhess-2024-102', Anonymous Referee #2, 28 Aug 2024
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Manuel Titos Luzon, 17 Oct 2024
-
RC3: 'Comment on nhess-2024-102', Anonymous Referee #3, 29 Aug 2024
- AC5: 'Reply on RC3', Manuel Titos Luzon, 17 Oct 2024
-
RC4: 'Comment on nhess-2024-102', Anonymous Referee #4, 06 Sep 2024
- AC4: 'Reply on RC4', Manuel Titos Luzon, 17 Oct 2024
-
RC5: 'Comment on nhess-2024-102', Anonymous Referee #5, 06 Sep 2024
- AC6: 'Reply on RC5', Manuel Titos Luzon, 17 Oct 2024
-
RC6: 'Comment on nhess-2024-102', Anonymous Referee #6, 06 Sep 2024
- AC7: 'Reply on RC6', Manuel Titos Luzon, 17 Oct 2024
-
RC7: 'Comment on nhess-2024-102', Anonymous Referee #7, 09 Sep 2024
- AC3: 'Reply on RC7', Manuel Titos Luzon, 17 Oct 2024
-
RC8: 'Comment on nhess-2024-102', Anonymous Referee #8, 20 Sep 2024
- AC8: 'Reply on RC8', Manuel Titos Luzon, 17 Oct 2024
Peer review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by editor and referees) (01 Nov 2024) by Maria Ana Baptista

AR by Manuel Titos Luzon on behalf of the Authors (12 Dec 2024)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (17 Jan 2025) by Maria Ana Baptista
RR by Gordon Woo (22 Jan 2025)

RR by Anonymous Referee #3 (24 Jan 2025)

RR by Anonymous Referee #5 (03 Feb 2025)

RR by Anonymous Referee #8 (06 Feb 2025)

ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by editor and referees) (06 Feb 2025) by Maria Ana Baptista

AR by Manuel Titos Luzon on behalf of the Authors (12 Mar 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (12 Mar 2025) by Maria Ana Baptista
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (25 Mar 2025)

RR by Anonymous Referee #8 (03 Apr 2025)

ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by editor and referees) (06 Jun 2025) by Veronica Pazzi

AR by Manuel Titos Luzon on behalf of the Authors (11 Jun 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (25 Jun 2025) by Veronica Pazzi
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (05 Jul 2025)

RR by Anonymous Referee #8 (11 Jul 2025)

ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (15 Jul 2025) by Veronica Pazzi

AR by Manuel Titos Luzon on behalf of the Authors (17 Jul 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (24 Jul 2025) by Veronica Pazzi

AR by Manuel Titos Luzon on behalf of the Authors (25 Jul 2025)
Manuscript
The authors are to be commended for tackling an important, but very challenging issue. However the equivocal nature of the results obtained is reflected in the interrogatory title.
For the outcome to be at all persuasive, the analyses should be undertaken for multiple Master catalogues and test databases, not just those from Deception Island and Popocatepetl. At the very least, there should be many test databases, not just a seismic experiment conducted in 2002. What would be the outcome for data from 2022?
In lines 235 to 240, assumptions are made about the equivalence of the marginal and conditional distributions for the source and target domains. For other selections of source and target, these assumptions may be much more tenuous.
Progress in volcano hazard forecasting requires a multidimensional monitoring approach, covering geodetic and geochemical monitoring, as well as modelling of volcano dynamics. Machine learning will be an important auxiliary tool to support volcanological decision-making. However, a restriction to seismological data is too limited.
An extended version of this paper might be a useful contribution to the volcano machine learning literature.