Articles | Volume 20, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3135-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3135-2020
Research article
 | 
27 Nov 2020
Research article |  | 27 Nov 2020

Multi-hazard risk assessment for roads: probabilistic versus deterministic approaches

Stefan Oberndorfer, Philip Sander, and Sven Fuchs

Viewed

Total article views: 5,220 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,284 1,753 183 5,220 208 237
  • HTML: 3,284
  • PDF: 1,753
  • XML: 183
  • Total: 5,220
  • BibTeX: 208
  • EndNote: 237
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Mar 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Mar 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,220 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,862 with geography defined and 358 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 30 Sep 2026
Download
Short summary
The article provides a comparison of a standard (deterministic) risk assessment approach for roads exposed to a multi-hazard environment with a probabilistic risk analysis method to show the potential bias in the results. A probabilistic approach enables the quantification of epistemic uncertainty and uses probability distributions to characterize data uncertainty of the input variables, while a deterministic computation uses single values with discrete values without uncertainty representation.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint