Articles | Volume 20, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3135-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3135-2020
Research article
 | 
27 Nov 2020
Research article |  | 27 Nov 2020

Multi-hazard risk assessment for roads: probabilistic versus deterministic approaches

Stefan Oberndorfer, Philip Sander, and Sven Fuchs

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by editor and referees) (31 Aug 2020) by Thomas Glade
AR by Stefan Oberndorfer on behalf of the Authors (20 Sep 2020)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (10 Oct 2020) by Thomas Glade
AR by Stefan Oberndorfer on behalf of the Authors (16 Oct 2020)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
The article provides a comparison of a standard (deterministic) risk assessment approach for roads exposed to a multi-hazard environment with a probabilistic risk analysis method to show the potential bias in the results. A probabilistic approach enables the quantification of epistemic uncertainty and uses probability distributions to characterize data uncertainty of the input variables, while a deterministic computation uses single values with discrete values without uncertainty representation.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint