Articles | Volume 25, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3333-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3333-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
11 Sep 2025
Research article |
| 11 Sep 2025
| 11 Sep 2025
Can model-based avalanche forecasts match the discriminatory skill of human danger-level forecasts? A comparison from Switzerland
Snow Avalanches and Prevention, WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland
Ross S. Purves
Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Stephanie Mayer
Snow Avalanches and Prevention, WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland
Günter Schmudlach
Skitourenguru GmbH, Zurich, Switzerland
Kurt Winkler
Snow Avalanches and Prevention, WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland
Related authors
Frank Techel, Karsten Müller, Christopher Marquardt, and Christoph Mitterer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3349, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3349, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how avalanche forecasters across Europe used a new tool called the EAWS Matrix to assess avalanche danger levels. Despite different approaches, many services used the Matrix in similar ways. Our findings can help to further improve the Matrix and support more consistent avalanche forecasts, leading to more reliable and credible avalanche information for people in snow-covered mountain regions.
Leonie Schäfer, Frank Techel, Günter Schmudlach, and Ross S. Purves
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2344, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2344, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Backcountry skiing is a popular form of recreation in Switzerland and worldwide, despite numerous avalanche accidents and fatalities that are recorded each year. There is a need for spatially explicit information on backcountry usage for effective risk estimations and avalanche forecast verification. We successfully used GPS tracks and online engagement data to model daily backcountry skiing base rates in the Swiss Alps based on a set of snow, weather, temporal and environmental variables.
Cristina Pérez-Guillén, Frank Techel, Michele Volpi, and Alec van Herwijnen
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1331–1351, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1331-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1331-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study assesses the performance and explainability of a random-forest classifier for predicting dry-snow avalanche danger levels during initial live testing. The model achieved ∼ 70 % agreement with human forecasts, performing equally well in nowcast and forecast modes, while capturing the temporal dynamics of avalanche forecasting. The explainability approach enhances the transparency of the model's decision-making process, providing a valuable tool for operational avalanche forecasting.
Alessandro Maissen, Frank Techel, and Michele Volpi
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7569–7593, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7569-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7569-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
By harnessing AI models, this work enables processing large amounts of data, including weather conditions, snowpack characteristics, and historical avalanche data, to predict human-like avalanche forecasts in Switzerland. Our proposed model can significantly assist avalanche forecasters in their decision-making process, thereby facilitating more efficient and accurate predictions crucial for ensuring safety in Switzerland's avalanche-prone regions.
Karsten Müller, Frank Techel, and Christoph Mitterer
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-48, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-48, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for NHESS
Short summary
Short summary
Avalanche forecasting is crucial for mountain safety. Tools like the European Avalanche Danger Scale and Matrix set standards for forecasters, but consistency still varies. We analyzed the use of the EAWS Matrix, aiding danger level assignment. Our analysis shows inconsistencies, suggesting further need for refinement and training.
Stephanie Mayer, Frank Techel, Jürg Schweizer, and Alec van Herwijnen
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3445–3465, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3445-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3445-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present statistical models to estimate the probability for natural dry-snow avalanche release and avalanche size based on the simulated layering of the snowpack. The benefit of these models is demonstrated in comparison with benchmark models based on the amount of new snow. From the validation with data sets of quality-controlled avalanche observations and danger levels, we conclude that these models may be valuable tools to support forecasting natural dry-snow avalanche activity.
Elisabeth D. Hafner, Frank Techel, Rodrigo Caye Daudt, Jan Dirk Wegner, Konrad Schindler, and Yves Bühler
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2895–2914, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2895-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2895-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Oftentimes when objective measurements are not possible, human estimates are used instead. In our study, we investigate the reproducibility of human judgement for size estimates, the mappings of avalanches from oblique photographs and remotely sensed imagery. The variability that we found in those estimates is worth considering as it may influence results and should be kept in mind for several applications.
Stephanie Mayer, Alec van Herwijnen, Frank Techel, and Jürg Schweizer
The Cryosphere, 16, 4593–4615, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4593-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4593-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Information on snow instability is crucial for avalanche forecasting. We introduce a novel machine-learning-based method to assess snow instability from snow stratigraphy simulated with the snow cover model SNOWPACK. To develop the model, we compared observed and simulated snow profiles. Our model provides a probability of instability for every layer of a simulated snow profile, which allows detection of the weakest layer and assessment of its degree of instability with one single index.
Cristina Pérez-Guillén, Frank Techel, Martin Hendrick, Michele Volpi, Alec van Herwijnen, Tasko Olevski, Guillaume Obozinski, Fernando Pérez-Cruz, and Jürg Schweizer
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2031–2056, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2031-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2031-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A fully data-driven approach to predicting the danger level for dry-snow avalanche conditions in Switzerland was developed. Two classifiers were trained using a large database of meteorological data, snow cover simulations, and danger levels. The models performed well throughout the Swiss Alps, reaching a performance similar to the current experience-based avalanche forecasts. This approach shows the potential to be a valuable supplementary decision support tool for assessing avalanche hazard.
Frank Techel, Stephanie Mayer, Cristina Pérez-Guillén, Günter Schmudlach, and Kurt Winkler
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1911–1930, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1911-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1911-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Can the resolution of forecasts of avalanche danger be increased by using a combination of absolute and comparative judgments? Using 5 years of Swiss avalanche forecasts, we show that, on average, sub-levels assigned to a danger level reflect the expected increase in the number of locations with poor snow stability and in the number and size of avalanches with increasing forecast sub-level.
Veronika Hutter, Frank Techel, and Ross S. Purves
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3879–3897, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3879-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3879-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
How is avalanche danger described in public avalanche forecasts? We analyzed 6000 textual descriptions of avalanche danger in Switzerland, taking the perspective of the forecaster. Avalanche danger was described rather consistently, although the results highlight the difficulty of communicating conditions that are neither rare nor frequent, neither small nor large. The study may help to refine the ways in which avalanche danger could be communicated to the public.
Jürg Schweizer, Christoph Mitterer, Benjamin Reuter, and Frank Techel
The Cryosphere, 15, 3293–3315, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3293-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3293-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Snow avalanches threaten people and infrastructure in snow-covered mountain regions. To mitigate the effects of avalanches, warnings are issued by public forecasting services. Presently, the five danger levels are described in qualitative terms. We aim to characterize the avalanche danger levels based on expert field observations of snow instability. Our findings contribute to an evidence-based description of danger levels and to improve consistency and accuracy of avalanche forecasts.
Elisabeth D. Hafner, Frank Techel, Silvan Leinss, and Yves Bühler
The Cryosphere, 15, 983–1004, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-983-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-983-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Satellites prove to be very valuable for documentation of large-scale avalanche periods. To test reliability and completeness, which has not been satisfactorily verified before, we attempt a full validation of avalanches mapped from two optical sensors and one radar sensor. Our results demonstrate the reliability of high-spatial-resolution optical data for avalanche mapping, the suitability of radar for mapping of larger avalanches and the unsuitability of medium-spatial-resolution optical data.
Frank Techel, Karsten Müller, and Jürg Schweizer
The Cryosphere, 14, 3503–3521, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3503-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3503-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Exploring a large data set of snow stability tests and avalanche observations, we quantitatively describe the three key elements that characterize avalanche danger: snowpack stability, the frequency distribution of snowpack stability, and avalanche size. The findings will aid in refining the definitions of the avalanche danger scale and in fostering its consistent usage.
Inhye Kong, Jan Seibert, and Ross S. Purves
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3795–3808, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3795-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3795-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines the timing and topics of newspaper coverage of droughts in England. Media attention correlated with drought-prone hydroclimatic conditions, particularly low precipitation and low groundwater levels, but also showed a seasonality bias, with more coverage in spring and summer, as exemplified by the 2022 summer drought. The findings reveal complex media dynamics in science communication, suggesting potential gaps in how droughts are framed by scientists versus the media.
Frank Techel, Karsten Müller, Christopher Marquardt, and Christoph Mitterer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3349, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3349, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how avalanche forecasters across Europe used a new tool called the EAWS Matrix to assess avalanche danger levels. Despite different approaches, many services used the Matrix in similar ways. Our findings can help to further improve the Matrix and support more consistent avalanche forecasts, leading to more reliable and credible avalanche information for people in snow-covered mountain regions.
Annika Kunz, Ross S. Purves, and Bruna Rohling
AGILE GIScience Ser., 6, 33, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-6-33-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-6-33-2025, 2025
Leonie Schäfer, Frank Techel, Günter Schmudlach, and Ross S. Purves
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2344, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2344, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Backcountry skiing is a popular form of recreation in Switzerland and worldwide, despite numerous avalanche accidents and fatalities that are recorded each year. There is a need for spatially explicit information on backcountry usage for effective risk estimations and avalanche forecast verification. We successfully used GPS tracks and online engagement data to model daily backcountry skiing base rates in the Swiss Alps based on a set of snow, weather, temporal and environmental variables.
Cristina Pérez-Guillén, Frank Techel, Michele Volpi, and Alec van Herwijnen
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1331–1351, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1331-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1331-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study assesses the performance and explainability of a random-forest classifier for predicting dry-snow avalanche danger levels during initial live testing. The model achieved ∼ 70 % agreement with human forecasts, performing equally well in nowcast and forecast modes, while capturing the temporal dynamics of avalanche forecasting. The explainability approach enhances the transparency of the model's decision-making process, providing a valuable tool for operational avalanche forecasting.
Stephanie Mayer, Martin Hendrick, Adrien Michel, Bettina Richter, Jürg Schweizer, Heini Wernli, and Alec van Herwijnen
The Cryosphere, 18, 5495–5517, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5495-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5495-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding the impact of climate change on snow avalanche activity is crucial for safeguarding lives and infrastructure. Here, we project changes in avalanche activity in the Swiss Alps throughout the 21st century. Our findings reveal elevation-dependent patterns of change, indicating a decrease in dry-snow avalanches alongside an increase in wet-snow avalanches at elevations above the current treeline. These results underscore the necessity to revisit measures for avalanche risk mitigation.
Alessandro Maissen, Frank Techel, and Michele Volpi
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7569–7593, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7569-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7569-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
By harnessing AI models, this work enables processing large amounts of data, including weather conditions, snowpack characteristics, and historical avalanche data, to predict human-like avalanche forecasts in Switzerland. Our proposed model can significantly assist avalanche forecasters in their decision-making process, thereby facilitating more efficient and accurate predictions crucial for ensuring safety in Switzerland's avalanche-prone regions.
Inhye Kong and Ross S. Purves
AGILE GIScience Ser., 5, 33, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-5-33-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-5-33-2024, 2024
Karsten Müller, Frank Techel, and Christoph Mitterer
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-48, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-48, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for NHESS
Short summary
Short summary
Avalanche forecasting is crucial for mountain safety. Tools like the European Avalanche Danger Scale and Matrix set standards for forecasters, but consistency still varies. We analyzed the use of the EAWS Matrix, aiding danger level assignment. Our analysis shows inconsistencies, suggesting further need for refinement and training.
Stephanie Mayer, Frank Techel, Jürg Schweizer, and Alec van Herwijnen
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3445–3465, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3445-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3445-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present statistical models to estimate the probability for natural dry-snow avalanche release and avalanche size based on the simulated layering of the snowpack. The benefit of these models is demonstrated in comparison with benchmark models based on the amount of new snow. From the validation with data sets of quality-controlled avalanche observations and danger levels, we conclude that these models may be valuable tools to support forecasting natural dry-snow avalanche activity.
Elisabeth D. Hafner, Frank Techel, Rodrigo Caye Daudt, Jan Dirk Wegner, Konrad Schindler, and Yves Bühler
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2895–2914, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2895-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2895-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Oftentimes when objective measurements are not possible, human estimates are used instead. In our study, we investigate the reproducibility of human judgement for size estimates, the mappings of avalanches from oblique photographs and remotely sensed imagery. The variability that we found in those estimates is worth considering as it may influence results and should be kept in mind for several applications.
Stephanie Mayer, Alec van Herwijnen, Frank Techel, and Jürg Schweizer
The Cryosphere, 16, 4593–4615, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4593-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4593-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Information on snow instability is crucial for avalanche forecasting. We introduce a novel machine-learning-based method to assess snow instability from snow stratigraphy simulated with the snow cover model SNOWPACK. To develop the model, we compared observed and simulated snow profiles. Our model provides a probability of instability for every layer of a simulated snow profile, which allows detection of the weakest layer and assessment of its degree of instability with one single index.
Mina Karimi, Mohammad Saadi Mesgari, Ross Stuart Purves, and Omid Reza Abbasi
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 5, 54, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-5-54-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-5-54-2022, 2022
Cristina Pérez-Guillén, Frank Techel, Martin Hendrick, Michele Volpi, Alec van Herwijnen, Tasko Olevski, Guillaume Obozinski, Fernando Pérez-Cruz, and Jürg Schweizer
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2031–2056, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2031-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2031-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A fully data-driven approach to predicting the danger level for dry-snow avalanche conditions in Switzerland was developed. Two classifiers were trained using a large database of meteorological data, snow cover simulations, and danger levels. The models performed well throughout the Swiss Alps, reaching a performance similar to the current experience-based avalanche forecasts. This approach shows the potential to be a valuable supplementary decision support tool for assessing avalanche hazard.
Stefan S. Ivanovic and Ross Purves
AGILE GIScience Ser., 3, 39, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-3-39-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-3-39-2022, 2022
Frank Techel, Stephanie Mayer, Cristina Pérez-Guillén, Günter Schmudlach, and Kurt Winkler
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1911–1930, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1911-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1911-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Can the resolution of forecasts of avalanche danger be increased by using a combination of absolute and comparative judgments? Using 5 years of Swiss avalanche forecasts, we show that, on average, sub-levels assigned to a danger level reflect the expected increase in the number of locations with poor snow stability and in the number and size of avalanches with increasing forecast sub-level.
Antoine Guillemot, Alec van Herwijnen, Eric Larose, Stephanie Mayer, and Laurent Baillet
The Cryosphere, 15, 5805–5817, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5805-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5805-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Ambient noise correlation is a broadly used method in seismology to monitor tiny changes in subsurface properties. Some environmental forcings may influence this method, including snow. During one winter season, we studied this snow effect on seismic velocity of the medium, recorded by a pair of seismic sensors. We detected and modeled a measurable effect during early snowfalls: the fresh new snow layer modifies rigidity and density of the medium, thus decreasing the recorded seismic velocity.
Veronika Hutter, Frank Techel, and Ross S. Purves
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3879–3897, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3879-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3879-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
How is avalanche danger described in public avalanche forecasts? We analyzed 6000 textual descriptions of avalanche danger in Switzerland, taking the perspective of the forecaster. Avalanche danger was described rather consistently, although the results highlight the difficulty of communicating conditions that are neither rare nor frequent, neither small nor large. The study may help to refine the ways in which avalanche danger could be communicated to the public.
Jürg Schweizer, Christoph Mitterer, Benjamin Reuter, and Frank Techel
The Cryosphere, 15, 3293–3315, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3293-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3293-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Snow avalanches threaten people and infrastructure in snow-covered mountain regions. To mitigate the effects of avalanches, warnings are issued by public forecasting services. Presently, the five danger levels are described in qualitative terms. We aim to characterize the avalanche danger levels based on expert field observations of snow instability. Our findings contribute to an evidence-based description of danger levels and to improve consistency and accuracy of avalanche forecasts.
Elisabeth D. Hafner, Frank Techel, Silvan Leinss, and Yves Bühler
The Cryosphere, 15, 983–1004, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-983-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-983-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Satellites prove to be very valuable for documentation of large-scale avalanche periods. To test reliability and completeness, which has not been satisfactorily verified before, we attempt a full validation of avalanches mapped from two optical sensors and one radar sensor. Our results demonstrate the reliability of high-spatial-resolution optical data for avalanche mapping, the suitability of radar for mapping of larger avalanches and the unsuitability of medium-spatial-resolution optical data.
Frank Techel, Karsten Müller, and Jürg Schweizer
The Cryosphere, 14, 3503–3521, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3503-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3503-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Exploring a large data set of snow stability tests and avalanche observations, we quantitatively describe the three key elements that characterize avalanche danger: snowpack stability, the frequency distribution of snowpack stability, and avalanche size. The findings will aid in refining the definitions of the avalanche danger scale and in fostering its consistent usage.
Cited articles
avalanche.org: North American Public Avalanche Danger Scale, https://avalanche.org/avalanche-encyclopedia/human/resources/north-american-public-avalanche-danger-scale/, last access: 12 August 2024. a
Bouchayer, C.: Synthesis of distributed snowpack simulation relevant for avalanche hazard forecasting, MSc. thesis, University Grenoble Alpes, France, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21665.20329, 2017. a
Breiman, L.: Random forests, Machine Learning, 45, 5–32, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324, 2001. a
COSMO: COSMO – Consortium for small-scale modeling, https://www.cosmo-model.org/content/model/cosmo/overview.htm, last access: 6 May 2025. a
Degraeuwe, B., Schmudlach, G., Winkler, K., and Köhler, J.: SLABS: An improved probabilistic method to assess the avalanche risk on backcountry ski tours, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 221, 104169, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2024.104169, 2024. a, b, c
Durand, Y., Giraud, G., Brun, E., Mérindol, L., and Martin, E.: A computer-based system simulating snowpack structures as a tool for regional avalanche forecasting, J. Glaciol., 45, 469–484, 1999. a
EAWS: Standards: avalanche size, https://www.avalanches.org/standards/avalanche-size/ (last access: 13 May 2022), 2019. a
Eckerstorfer, M., Bühler, Y., Frauenfelder, R., and Malnes, E.: Remote sensing of snow avalanches: Recent advances, potential, and limitations, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 121, 126–140, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.11.001, 2016. a
Fox, J., Siebenbrunner, A., Reitinger, S., Peer, D., and Rodríguez-Sánchez, A.: Automating avalanche detection in ground-based photographs with deep learning, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 223, 104179, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2024.104179, 2024. a
Fromm, R. and Schönberger, C.: Estimating the danger of snow avalanches with a machine learning approach using a comprehensive snow cover model, Machine Learning with Applications, 10, 100405, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2022.100405, 2022. a, b
Gräler, B., Pebesma, E., and Heuvelink, G.: Spatio-Temporal Interpolation using gstat, The R Journal, 8, 204–218, https://journal.r-project.org/archive/2016/RJ-2016-014/index.html (last access: 5 September 2025), 2016. a
Hafner, E. D., Techel, F., Leinss, S., and Bühler, Y.: Mapping avalanches with satellites – evaluation of performance and completeness, The Cryosphere, 15, 983–1004, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-983-2021, 2021. a, b
Hafner, E. D., Barton, P., Daudt, R. C., Wegner, J. D., Schindler, K., and Bühler, Y.: Automated avalanche mapping from SPOT 6/7 satellite imagery with deep learning: results, evaluation, potential and limitations, The Cryosphere, 16, 3517–3530, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3517-2022, 2022. a
Hendrick, M., Techel, F., Volpi, M., Olevski, T., Pérez-Guillén, C., van Herwijnen, A., and Schweizer, J.: Automated prediction of wet-snow avalanche activity in the Swiss Alps, J. Glaciol., 69, 1365–1378, https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.24, 2023. a, b, c
Hengl, T., Heuvelink, G. B., and Rossiter, D. G.: About regression-kriging: From equations to case studies, Comput. Geosci., 33, 1301–1315, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.05.001, 2007. a, b
Herla, F., Horton, S., Mair, P., and Haegeli, P.: Snow profile alignment and similarity assessment for aggregating, clustering, and evaluating snowpack model output for avalanche forecasting, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 239–258, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-239-2021, 2021. a
Herla, F., Haegeli, P., and Mair, P.: A data exploration tool for averaging and accessing large data sets of snow stratigraphy profiles useful for avalanche forecasting, The Cryosphere, 16, 3149–3162, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3149-2022, 2022. a
Herla, F., Haegeli, P., Horton, S., and Mair, P.: A large-scale validation of snowpack simulations in support of avalanche forecasting focusing on critical layers, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2727–2756, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2727-2024, 2024. a, b
Herla, F., Haegeli, P., Horton, S., and Mair, P.: A quantitative module of avalanche hazard – comparing forecaster assessments of storm and persistent slab avalanche problems with information derived from distributed snowpack simulations, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 625–646, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-625-2025, 2025. a, b, c, d, e
Horton, S., Nowak, S., and Haegeli, P.: Enhancing the operational value of snowpack models with visualization design principles, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1557–1572, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1557-2020, 2020. a
Horton, S., Haegeli, P., Klassen, K., Floyer, J., and Helgeson, G.: Adopting SNOWPACK models into an operational forecasting program: successes, challenges, and future outlook, in: Proceedings International Snow Science Workshop, Bend, Oregon, 2023, 1544–1549, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/item.php?id=3095 (last access: 5 September 2025), 2023. a
Horton, S., Herla, F., and Haegeli, P.: Clustering simulated snow profiles to form avalanche forecast regions, Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 193–209, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-193-2025, 2025. a, b
Hutter, V., Techel, F., and Purves, R. S.: How is avalanche danger described in textual descriptions in avalanche forecasts in Switzerland? Consistency between forecasters and avalanche danger, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3879–3897, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3879-2021, 2021. a, b
Intercantonal Measurement and Information System IMIS: IMIS measuring network, Intercantonal Measurement and Information System IMIS [data set], https://doi.org/10.16904/envidat.406, 2024. a
Lehning, M., Bartelt, P., Brown, R., Fierz, C., and Satyawali, P.: A physical SNOWPACK model for the Swiss avalanche warning; Part II. Snow microstructure, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 35, 147–167, 2002. a
Lucas, C., Trachsel, J., Eberli, M., Grüter, S., Winkler, K., and Techel, F.: Introducing sublevels in the Swiss avalanche forecast, in: Proceedings International Snow Science Workshop ISSW 2023, Bend, Oregon, USA, 8–13 October 2023, 240–247, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/objects/ISSW2023_P1.19.pdf (last access: 5 September 2025), 2023. a
Maissen, A., Techel, F., and Volpi, M.: A three-stage model pipeline predicting regional avalanche danger in Switzerland (RAvaFcast v1.0.0): a decision-support tool for operational avalanche forecasting, Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7569–7593, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7569-2024, 2024. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Mayer, S., van Herwijnen, A., Ulivieri, G., and Schweizer, J.: Evaluating the performance of an operational infrasound avalanche detection system at three locations in the Swiss Alps during two winter seasons, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 173, 102962, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.102962, 2020. a
Mayer, S., Techel, F., Schweizer, J., and van Herwijnen, A.: Prediction of natural dry-snow avalanche activity using physics-based snowpack simulations, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3445–3465, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3445-2023, 2023. a, b, c, d
MeteoSwiss: ICON forecasting system, MeteoSwiss, https://www.meteoswiss.admin.ch/weather/warning-and-forecasting-systems/icon-forecasting-systems.html, last access: 6 May 2025. a
Monti, F., Schweizer, J., and Fierz, C.: Hardness estimation and weak layer detection in simulated snow stratigraphy, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 103, 82–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2014.03.009, 2014. a
Morin, S., Horton, S., Techel, F., Bavay, M., Coléou, C., Fierz, C., Gobiet, A., Hagenmuller, P., Lafaysse, M., Ližar, M., Mitterer, C., Monti, F., Müller, K., Olefs, M., Snook, J. S., van Herwijnen, A., and Vionnet, V.: Application of physical snowpack models in support of operational avalanche hazard forecasting: A status report on current implementations and prospects for the future, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 170, 102910, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.102910, 2020. a, b, c
Mott, R., Winstral, A., Cluzet, B., Helbig, N., Magnusson, J., Mazzotti, G., Quéno, L., Schirmer, M., Webster, C., and Jonas, T.: Operational snow-hydrological modeling for Switzerland, Frontiers in Earth Science, 11, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1228158, 2023. a
Murphy, A.: Probabilities, odds, and forecasts of rare events, Weather and Forecasting, 6, 302–307, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1991)006<0302:POAFOR>2.0.CO;2, 1991. a
Pebesma, E.: Simple features for R: Standardized support for spatial vector data, R J., 10, 439–446, https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-009, 2018. a
Pebesma, E. and Bivand, R.: Spatial Data Science: With applications in R, Chapman and Hall/CRC, https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429459016, 2023. a
Pebesma, E. J.: Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package, Comput. Geosci., 30, 683–691, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.012, 2004. a
Pérez-Guillén, C., Techel, F., Hendrick, M., Volpi, M., van Herwijnen, A., Olevski, T., Obozinski, G., Pérez-Cruz, F., and Schweizer, J.: Data-driven automated predictions of the avalanche danger level for dry-snow conditions in Switzerland, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2031–2056, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2031-2022, 2022. a, b, c, d, e
Perfler, M., Binder, M., Reuter, B., Prinz, R., and Mitterer, C.: Assessing avalanche problems for operational avalanche forecasting based on different model chains, in: Proceedings, International Snow Science Workshop, Bend, Oregon, 8–13 October 2023, 128–134, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/objects/ISSW2023_O4.05.pdf (last access: 5 September 2025), 2023. a
Purves, R., Morrison, K., Moss, G., and Wright, D.: Nearest neighbours for avalanche forecasting in Scotland: development, verification and optimisation of a model, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 37, 343–355, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-232X(03)00075-2, 2003. a
Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., and Karniadakis, G.: Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys., 378, 686–707, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045, 2019. a
Reuter, B., Viallon-Galinier, L., Horton, S., van Herwijnen, A., Mayer, S., Hagenmuller, P., and Morin, S.: Characterizing snow instability with avalanche problem types derived from snow cover simulations, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 194, 103462, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2021.103462, 2022. a
Richter, B., Schweizer, J., Rotach, M. W., and van Herwijnen, A.: Validating modeled critical crack length for crack propagation in the snow cover model SNOWPACK, The Cryosphere, 13, 3353–3366, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-3353-2019, 2019. a
Schweizer, J., Kronholm, K., and Wiesinger, T.: Verification of regional snowpack stability and avalanche danger, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 37, 277–288, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-232X(03)00070-3, 2003. a
Schweizer, J., Mitterer, C., Techel, F., Stoffel, A., and Reuter, B.: On the relation between avalanche occurrence and avalanche danger level, The Cryosphere, 14, 737–750, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-737-2020, 2020. a, b
SLF: Avalanche bulletin interpretation guide, WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, September 2023 edn., https://www.slf.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/SLF/Lawinenbulletin_Schneesituation/Wissen_zum_Lawinenbulletin/Interpretationshilfe/Interpretationshilfe_EN.pdf (last access: 12 August 2024), 2023. a, b, c, d
Soland, K.: Towards automating avalanche forecasts: A kriging model to interpolate modeled snow instability in the Swiss Alps, https://lean-gate.geo.uzh.ch/typo3conf/ext/qfq/Classes/Api/download.php/mastersThesis/1048 (last access: 5 September 2025), 2024. a
Sykes, J., Haegeli, P., Atkins, R., Mair, P., and Bühler, Y.: Development of operational decision support tools for mechanized ski guiding using avalanche terrain modeling, GPS tracking, and machine learning, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1255–1292, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1255-2025, 2025. a
Techel, F.: On consistency and quality in public avalanche forecasting: a data-driven approach to forecast verification and to refining definitions of avalanche danger, PhD thesis, Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich Switzerland, https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-199650, 2020. a
Techel, F. and Schmudlach, G.: Evaluating the predictive performance of human avalanche forecasts and model predictions in Switzerland, EnviDat [data set], https://doi.org/10.16904/envidat.535, 2024. a
Techel, F., Müller, K., and Schweizer, J.: On the importance of snowpack stability, the frequency distribution of snowpack stability, and avalanche size in assessing the avalanche danger level, The Cryosphere, 14, 3503–3521, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3503-2020, 2020a. a
Techel, F., Pielmeier, C., and Winkler, K.: Refined dry-snow avalanche danger ratings in regional avalanche forecasts: consistent? And better than random?, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 180, 103162, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2020.103162, 2020b. a
Techel, F., Mayer, S., Pérez-Guillén, C., Schmudlach, G., and Winkler, K.: On the correlation between a sub-level qualifier refining the danger level with observations and models relating to the contributing factors of avalanche danger, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1911–1930, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1911-2022, 2022. a, b, c, d
Techel, F., Helfenstein, A., Mayer, S., Pérez-Guillén, C., Purves, R., Ruesch, M., Schmudlach, G., Soland, K., and Winkler, K.: Human vs Machine – Comparing model predictions and human forecasts of avalanche danger and snow instability in the Swiss Alps, in: Proceedings International Snow Science Workshop, Tromsø, Norway, 23–29 September 2024, 31–38, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/item.php?id=3108 (last access: 5 September 2025), 2024a. a, b
Techel, F., Mayer, S., Purves, R. S., Schmudlach, G., and Winkler, K.: Forecasting avalanche danger: human-made forecasts vs. fully automated model-driven predictions, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-158, in review, 2024b. a
Techel, F., Purves, R., Mayer, S., Schmudlach, G., and Winkler, K.: Can model-based avalanche forecasts match the discriminatory skill of human danger-level forecasts? A comparison from Switzerland (data, code), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17060394, 2025.
Trachsel, J., Richter, B., Staehly, S., Mayer, S., Wahlen, S., van Herwijnen, A., and Techel, F.: Combining model predictions and radar avalanche detections for operational avalanche forecasting, in: Proceedings International Snow Science Workshop, Tromsø, Norway, 23–29 September 2024, 1079–1084, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/item.php?id=3271 (last access: 5 September 2025), 2024. a, b
van Herwijnen, A., Mayer, S., Pérez-Guillén, C., Techel, F., Hendrick, M., and Schweizer, J.: Data-driven models used in operational avalanche forecasting in Switzerland, in: International Snow Science Workshop ISSW 2023, Bend, Oregon, USA, 8–13 October 2023, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/objects/ISSW2023_P1.33.pdf (last access: 5 September 2025), 2023. a
Viallon-Galinier, L., Hagenmuller, P., and Eckert, N.: Combining modelled snowpack stability with machine learning to predict avalanche activity, The Cryosphere, 17, 2245–2260, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2245-2023, 2023. a
Vionnet, V., Brun, E., Morin, S., Boone, A., Faroux, S., Le Moigne, P., Martin, E., and Willemet, J.-M.: The detailed snowpack scheme Crocus and its implementation in SURFEX v7.2, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 773–791, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-773-2012, 2012. a
Winkler, K., Schmudlach, G., Degraeuwe, B., and Techel, F.: On the correlation between the forecast avalanche danger and avalanche risk taken by backcountry skiers in Switzerland, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 188, 103299, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2021.103299, 2021. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
Winkler, K., Trachsel, J., Knerr, J., Niederer, U., Weiss, G., Ruesch, M., and Techel, F.: SAFE – a layer-based avalanche forecast editor for better integration of model predictions, in: Proceedings International Snow Science Workshop, Tromsø, Norway, 23–29 September 2024, 124–131, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/item.php?id=3123 (last access: 5 September 2025), 2024. a
Young, M. V. and Grahame, N. S.: The history of UK weather forecasting: the changing role of the central guidance forecaster. Part 7: Operational forecasting in the twenty-first century: graphical guidance products, risk assessment and impact-based warnings, Weather, 79, 72–80, https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.4488, 2024. a
Short summary
We tested how well fully data- and model-driven avalanche forecasts compare to human-made forecasts, which also integrate added context like field observations or model output. Using data from Switzerland over three winters, we found that models – even without this extra input – performed nearly as well. While human forecasts still have a slight edge, model predictions already offer reliable support for daily avalanche forecasting.
We tested how well fully data- and model-driven avalanche forecasts compare to human-made...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint