Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
NHESS
Articles | Volume 25, issue 9
Articles | Volume 25, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3333-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3333-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 25, issue 9
Research article
 | 
11 Sep 2025
Research article |  | 11 Sep 2025

Can model-based avalanche forecasts match the discriminatory skill of human danger-level forecasts? A comparison from Switzerland

Frank Techel, Ross S. Purves, Stephanie Mayer, Günter Schmudlach, and Kurt Winkler

Viewed

Total article views: 3,849 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,074 429 346 3,849 117 129
  • HTML: 3,074
  • PDF: 429
  • XML: 346
  • Total: 3,849
  • BibTeX: 117
  • EndNote: 129
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Sep 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Sep 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,849 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,719 with geography defined and 130 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 13 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
We tested how well fully data- and model-driven avalanche forecasts compare to human-made forecasts, which also integrate added context like field observations or model output. Using data from Switzerland over three winters, we found that models – even without this extra input – performed nearly as well. While human forecasts still have a slight edge, model predictions already offer reliable support for daily avalanche forecasting.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint