Articles | Volume 24, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1757-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1757-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
16 May 2024
Research article |
| 16 May 2024
| 16 May 2024
Text mining uncovers the unique dynamics of socio-economic impacts of the 2018–2022 multi-year drought in Germany
Jan Sodoge
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Urban and Environmental Sociology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
Institute of Environmental Science and Geography, University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany
Christian Kuhlicke
Department of Urban and Environmental Sociology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
Institute of Environmental Science and Geography, University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany
Miguel D. Mahecha
Remote Sensing Centre for Earth System Research, Leipzig University, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
Department of Remote Sensing, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle–Jena–Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
Mariana Madruga de Brito
Department of Urban and Environmental Sociology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
Related authors
Jan Sodoge, Taís Maria Nunes Carvalho, and Mariana Madruga de Brito
Geosci. Commun., 8, 191–196, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-8-191-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-8-191-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Thousands of geoscience abstracts are presented at the European Geosciences Union (EGU) General Assembly, but researchers often miss key insights by focusing on their own field. Using natural language processing (NLP), we help scientists find relevant research across disciplines. This approach breaks down boundaries, encouraging broader knowledge sharing and new interdisciplinary connections in the geosciences.
Timothy Tiggeloven, Colin Raymond, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Jana Sillmann, Annegret H. Thieken, Sophie L. Buijs, Roxana Ciurean, Emma Cordier, Julia M. Crummy, Lydia Cumiskey, Kelley De Polt, Melanie Duncan, Davide M. Ferrario, Wiebke S. Jäger, Elco E. Koks, Nicole van Maanen, Heather J. Murdock, Jaroslav Mysiak, Sadhana Nirandjan, Benjamin Poschlod, Peter Priesmeier, Nivedita Sairam, Pia-Johanna Schweizer, Tristian R. Stolte, Marie-Luise Zenker, James E. Daniell, Alexander Fekete, Christian M. Geiß, Marc J. C. van den Homberg, Sirkku K. Juhola, Christian Kuhlicke, Karen Lebek, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Stefan Schneiderbauer, Silvia Torresan, Cees J. van Westen, Judith N. Claassen, Bijan Khazai, Virginia Murray, Julius Schlumberger, and Philip J. Ward
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2771, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2771, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscience Communication (GC).
Short summary
Short summary
Natural hazards like floods, earthquakes, and landslides are often interconnected which may create bigger problems than when they occur alone. We studied expert discussions from an international conference to understand how scientists and policymakers can better prepare for these multi-hazards and use new technologies to protect its communities while contributing to dialogues about future international agreements beyond the Sendai Framework and supporting global sustainability goals.
Jan Sodoge, Taís Maria Nunes Carvalho, and Mariana Madruga de Brito
Geosci. Commun., 8, 191–196, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-8-191-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-8-191-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Thousands of geoscience abstracts are presented at the European Geosciences Union (EGU) General Assembly, but researchers often miss key insights by focusing on their own field. Using natural language processing (NLP), we help scientists find relevant research across disciplines. This approach breaks down boundaries, encouraging broader knowledge sharing and new interdisciplinary connections in the geosciences.
Louise Cavalcante, David W. Walker, Sarra Kchouk, Germano Ribeiro Neto, Taís Maria Nunes Carvalho, Mariana Madruga de Brito, Wieke Pot, Art Dewulf, and Pieter R. van Oel
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1993–2005, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1993-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1993-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Drought affects not only water availability but also agriculture, the economy, and communities. This study explores how public policies help reduce these impacts in Ceará, Northeast Brazil. Using qualitative drought monitoring data, interviews, and policy analysis, we found that policies supporting local economies help lessen drought effects. However, most reported impacts are still related to water shortages, showing the need for broader strategies beyond water supply investment.
Na Li, Sebastian Sippel, Nora Linscheid, Miguel D. Mahecha, Markus Reichstein, and Ana Bastos
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1924, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1924, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The global land carbon sink has increased since the pre-industrial period, mainly caused by increasing atmospheric CO2 emissions and climate change. However, the large year-to-year variations can mask or amplify this trend. Here, we detect the time for the anthropogenic signal to emerge over natural variations in land carbon sink. We removed the circulation-induced variations in the global land carbon sink and effectively reduced the detection time of anthropogenic signal.
Lisa Köhler, Torsten Masson, Sungju Han, and Christian Kuhlicke
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1362, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1362, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines how frequent flood experience relate to social norms and responsibility attribution. Using survey data from Saxony (Germany), we find that respondents with multiple flood experience are more likely to perceive social norms supporting individual protective behavior, ascribe more responsibility to public authorities and less to their community. This suggests a "we" vs. "them" polarization, potentially harming individual preparedness.
Julius Schlumberger, Tristian Stolte, Helena Margaret Garcia, Antonia Sebastian, Wiebke Jäger, Philip Ward, Marleen de Ruiter, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Annegien Tijssen, and Mariana Madruga de Brito
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-850, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-850, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The risk flood of flood impacts is dynamic as society continuously responds to specific events or ongoing developments. We analyzed 28 studies that assess such dynamics of vulnerability. Most research uses surveys and basic statistics data, while integrated, flexible models are seldom used. The studies struggle to link specific events or developments to the observed changes. Our findings highlight needs and possible directions towards a better assessment of vulnerability dynamics.
Francesco Martinuzzi, Miguel D. Mahecha, Gustau Camps-Valls, David Montero, Tristan Williams, and Karin Mora
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 535–557, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-535-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-535-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated how machine learning can forecast extreme vegetation responses to weather. Examining four models, no single one stood out as the best, though "echo state networks" showed minor advantages. Our results indicate that while these tools are able to generally model vegetation states, they face challenges under extreme conditions. This underlines the potential of artificial intelligence in ecosystem modeling, also pinpointing areas that need further research.
Samuel Jonson Sutanto, Matthijs Janssen, Mariana Madruga de Brito, and Maria del Pozo Garcia
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3703–3721, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3703-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3703-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A conventional flood risk assessment only evaluates flood hazard in isolation without considering wildfires. This study, therefore, evaluates the effect of wildfires on flood risk, considering both current and future conditions for the Ebro River basin in Spain. Results show that extreme climate change increases the risk of flooding, especially when considering the effect of wildfires, highlighting the importance of adopting a multi-hazard risk management approach.
Anca Anghelea, Ewelina Dobrowolska, Gunnar Brandt, Martin Reinhardt, Miguel Mahecha, Tejas Morbagal Harish, and Stephan Meissl
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-2024, 13–18, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-2024-13-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-2024-13-2024, 2024
Mélanie Weynants, Chaonan Ji, Nora Linscheid, Ulrich Weber, Miguel D. Mahecha, and Fabian Gans
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-396, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-396, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
Climate extremes are intensifying. The impacts of heatwaves and droughts can be made worse when they happen at the same time. Dheed is a global database of dry and hot compound extreme events from 1950 to 2022. It can be combined with other data to study the impacts of those events on terrestrial ecosystems, specific species or human societies. Dheed's analysis confirms that extremely dry and hot days have become more common on all continents in recent decades, especially in Europe and Africa.
Riccardo Biella, Anastasiya Shyrokaya, Ilias Pechlivanidis, Daniela Cid, Maria Carmen Llasat, Marthe Wens, Marleen Lam, Elin Stenfors, Samuel Sutanto, Elena Ridolfi, Serena Ceola, Pedro Alencar, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Monica Ionita, Mariana Madruga de Brito, Scott J. McGrane, Benedetta Moccia, Viorica Nagavciuc, Fabio Russo, Svitlana Krakovska, Andrijana Todorovic, Faranak Tootoonchi, Patricia Trambauer, Raffaele Vignola, and Claudia Teutschbein
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2073, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2073, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This research by the Drought in the Anthropocene (DitA) network highlights the crucial role of forecasting systems and Drought Management Plans in European drought risk management. Based on a survey of water managers during the 2022 European drought, it underscores the impact of preparedness on response and the evolution of drought management strategies across the continent. The study concludes with a plea for a European Drought Directive.
Miguel D. Mahecha, Guido Kraemer, and Fabio Crameri
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1153–1159, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1153-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1153-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our paper examines the visual representation of the planetary boundary concept, which helps convey Earth's capacity to sustain human life. We identify three issues: exaggerated impact sizes, confusing color patterns, and inaccessibility for colour-vision deficiency. These flaws can lead to overstating risks. We suggest improving these visual elements for more accurate and accessible information for decision-makers.
Riccardo Biella, Ansastasiya Shyrokaya, Monica Ionita, Raffaele Vignola, Samuel Sutanto, Andrijana Todorovic, Claudia Teutschbein, Daniela Cid, Maria Carmen Llasat, Pedro Alencar, Alessia Matanó, Elena Ridolfi, Benedetta Moccia, Ilias Pechlivanidis, Anne van Loon, Doris Wendt, Elin Stenfors, Fabio Russo, Jean-Philippe Vidal, Lucy Barker, Mariana Madruga de Brito, Marleen Lam, Monika Bláhová, Patricia Trambauer, Raed Hamed, Scott J. McGrane, Serena Ceola, Sigrid Jørgensen Bakke, Svitlana Krakovska, Viorica Nagavciuc, Faranak Tootoonchi, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Sandra Hauswirth, Shreedhar Maskey, Svitlana Zubkovych, Marthe Wens, and Lena Merete Tallaksen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2069, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2069, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This research by the Drought in the Anthropocene (DitA) network highlights gaps in European drought management exposed by the 2022 drought and proposes a new direction. Using a Europe-wide survey of water managers, we examine four areas: increasing drought risk, impacts, drought management strategies, and their evolution. Despite growing risks, management remains fragmented and short-term. However, signs of improvement suggest readiness for change. We advocate for a European Drought Directive.
Francesco Martinuzzi, Miguel D. Mahecha, David Montero, Lazaro Alonso, and Karin Mora
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W12-2024, 89–95, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W12-2024-89-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W12-2024-89-2024, 2024
David Montero, Miguel D. Mahecha, César Aybar, Clemens Mosig, and Sebastian Wieneke
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W12-2024, 105–112, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W12-2024-105-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W12-2024-105-2024, 2024
Lisa Köhler, Torsten Masson, Sabrina Köhler, and Christian Kuhlicke
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2787–2806, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2787-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2787-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed the impact of flood experience on adaptive behavior and self-reported resilience. The outcomes draw a paradoxical picture: the most experienced people are the most adapted but the least resilient. We find evidence for non-linear relationships between the number of floods experienced and resilience. We contribute to existing knowledge by focusing specifically on the number of floods experienced and extending the rare scientific literature on the influence of experience on resilience.
Na Li, Sebastian Sippel, Alexander J. Winkler, Miguel D. Mahecha, Markus Reichstein, and Ana Bastos
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 1505–1533, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1505-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1505-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Quantifying the imprint of large-scale atmospheric circulation dynamics and associated carbon cycle responses is key to improving our understanding of carbon cycle dynamics. Using a statistical model that relies on spatiotemporal sea level pressure as a proxy for large-scale atmospheric circulation, we quantify the fraction of interannual variability in atmospheric CO2 growth rate and the land CO2 sink that are driven by atmospheric circulation variability.
Samuel Rufat, Mariana Madruga de Brito, Alexander Fekete, Emeline Comby, Peter J. Robinson, Iuliana Armaş, W. J. Wouter Botzen, and Christian Kuhlicke
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2655–2672, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2655-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2655-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
It remains unclear why people fail to act adaptively to reduce future losses, even when there is ever-richer information available. To improve the ability of researchers to build cumulative knowledge, we conducted an international survey – the Risk Perception and Behaviour Survey of Surveyors (Risk-SoS). We find that most studies are exploratory and often overlook theoretical efforts that would enable the accumulation of evidence. We offer several recommendations for future studies.
D. Montero, C. Aybar, M. D. Mahecha, and S. Wieneke
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W1-2022, 301–306, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W1-2022-301-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W1-2022-301-2022, 2022
Franciele Maria Vanelli, Masato Kobiyama, and Mariana Madruga de Brito
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2301–2317, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2301-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2301-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We conducted a systematic literature review of socio-hydrological studies applied to natural hazards and disaster research. Results indicate that there is a wide range of understanding of what
socialmeans in socio-hydrology, and monodisciplinary studies prevail. We expect to encourage socio-hydrologists to investigate different disasters using a more integrative approach that combines natural and social sciences tools by involving stakeholders and broadening the use of mixed methods.
J. Pacheco-Labrador, U. Weber, X. Ma, M. D. Mahecha, N. Carvalhais, C. Wirth, A. Huth, F. J. Bohn, G. Kraemer, U. Heiden, FunDivEUROPE members, and M. Migliavacca
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVI-1-W1-2021, 49–55, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVI-1-W1-2021-49-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVI-1-W1-2021-49-2022, 2022
Luana Lavagnoli Moreira, Mariana Madruga de Brito, and Masato Kobiyama
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1513–1530, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1513-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1513-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The review of flood vulnerability indices revealed that (1) temporal dynamic aspects were often disregarded, (2) coping and adaptive capacity indicators were frequently ignored, as obtaining these data demand time and effort, and (3) most studies neither applied sensitivity (90.5 %) or uncertainty analyses (96.8 %) nor validated the results (86.3 %). The study highlights the importance of addressing these gaps to produce scientifically rigorous and comparable research.
Christopher Krich, Mirco Migliavacca, Diego G. Miralles, Guido Kraemer, Tarek S. El-Madany, Markus Reichstein, Jakob Runge, and Miguel D. Mahecha
Biogeosciences, 18, 2379–2404, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2379-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2379-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Ecosystems and the atmosphere interact with each other. These interactions determine e.g. the water and carbon fluxes and thus are crucial to understand climate change effects. We analysed the interactions for many ecosystems across the globe, showing that very different ecosystems can have similar interactions with the atmosphere. Meteorological conditions seem to be the strongest interaction-shaping factor. This means that common principles can be identified to describe ecosystem behaviour.
Milan Flach, Alexander Brenning, Fabian Gans, Markus Reichstein, Sebastian Sippel, and Miguel D. Mahecha
Biogeosciences, 18, 39–53, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-39-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-39-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Drought and heat events affect the uptake and sequestration of carbon in terrestrial ecosystems. We study the impact of droughts and heatwaves on the uptake of CO2 of different vegetation types at the global scale. We find that agricultural areas are generally strongly affected. Forests instead are not particularly sensitive to the events under scrutiny. This implies different water management strategies of forests but also a lack of sensitivity to remote-sensing-derived vegetation activity.
Cited articles
Al-Faraj, F. A. and Tigkas, D.: Impacts of multi-year droughts and upstream human-induced activities on the development of a semi-arid transboundary basin, Water Resour. Manag., 30, 5131–5143, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1473-9, 2016.
Arabzadeh, R., Kholoosi, M. M., and Bazrafshan, J.: Regional hydrological drought monitoring using principal components analysis, J. Irrig. Drain. E., 142, 04015029, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000925, 2016.
Bachmair, S., Svensson, C., Prosdocimi, I., Hannaford, J., and Stahl, K.: Developing drought impact functions for drought risk management, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1947–1960, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1947-2017, 2017.
Blauhut, V., Gudmundsson, L., and Stahl, K.: Towards pan-European drought risk maps: quantifying the link between drought indices and reported drought impacts, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 014008, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/014008, 2015.
Blauhut, V., Stahl, K., Stagge, J. H., Tallaksen, L. M., De Stefano, L., and Vogt, J.: Estimating drought risk across Europe from reported drought impacts, drought indices, and vulnerability factors, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2779–2800, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2779-2016, 2016.
Boeing, F., Rakovec, O., Kumar, R., Samaniego, L., Schrön, M., Hildebrandt, A., Rebmann, C., Thober, S., Müller, S., Zacharias, S., Bogena, H., Schneider, K., Kiese, R., Attinger, S., and Marx, A.: High-resolution drought simulations and comparison to soil moisture observations in Germany, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5137–5161, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5137-2022, 2022.
de Brito, M. M., Sodoge, J., Fekete, A., Hagenlocher, M., Koks, E., Kuhlicke, C., Messori, G., de Ruiter, M., Schweizer, P.-J., and Ward, P. J.: Uncovering the Dynamics of Multi-Sector Impacts of Hydrological Extremes: A Methods Overview, Earths Future, 12, e2023EF003906, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF003906, 2024.
Buras, A., Rammig, A., and Zang, C. S.: Quantifying impacts of the 2018 drought on European ecosystems in comparison to 2003, Biogeosciences, 17, 1655–1672, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1655-2020, 2020.
Büttner, G., Feranec, J., Jaffrain, G., Mari, L., Maucha, G., and Soukup, T.: The CORINE land cover 2000 project, EARSeL EProceedings, 3, 331–346, 2004.
BZL: Waldbrandstatistik der Bundesrepublik Deutschland für das Jahr 2019, Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung, https://www.ble.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/BZL/Daten-Berichte/Waldbrandstatistik/Waldbrandstatistik-2019.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4 (last access: 1 December 2023), 2020.
Challinor, A. J., Adger, W. N., and Benton, T. G.: Climate risks across borders and scales, Nat. Clim. Change, 7, 621–623, 2017.
Challinor, A. J., Adger, W. N., Benton, T. G., Conway, D., Joshi, M., and Frame, D.: Transmission of climate risks across sectors and borders, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 376, 20170301, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3380, 2018.
Chen, X., Tian, F., and Su, Y.: How did the late 1920s drought affect northern Chinese society?, Weather Clim. Extrem., 36, 100451, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2022.100451, 2022.
Conradt, H., Engelhardt, H., Menz, C., Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Farizo, B. A., Peña-Angulo, D., Domínguez-Castro, F., Eklundh, L., Jin, H., Boincean, B., Murphy, C., López-Moreno, J. I.: Cross-sectoral impacts of the 2018–2019 Central European drought and climate resilience in the German part of the Elbe River basin, Reg. Environ. Change, 23, 32, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-023-02032-3, 2023.
Dahlmann, H., Stephan, R., and Stahl, K.: Upstream-downstream asymmetries of drought impacts in major river basins of the European Alps, Front. Water, 4, 1061991, https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.1061991, 2022.
Damian, N., Mitrică, B., Mocanu, I., Grigorescu, I., and Dumitraşcu, M.: An index-based approach to assess the vulnerability of socio-ecological systems to aridity and drought in the Danube Delta, Romania, Environ. Dev., 45, 100799, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2022.100799, 2023.
de Brito, M. M.: Compound and cascading drought impacts do not happen by chance: A proposal to quantify their relationships, Sci. Total Environ., 778, 146236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146236, 2021.
de Brito, M. M., Kuhlicke, C., and Marx, A.: Near-real-time drought impact assessment: a text mining approach on the 2018/19 drought in Germany, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 1040a9, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba4ca, 2020.
De Silva, M. and Kawasaki, A.: Socioeconomic vulnerability to disaster risk: a case study of flood and drought impact in a rural Sri Lankan community, Ecol. Econ., 152, 131–140, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.010, 2018.
De Stefano, L., Tánago, I., Ballesteros Olza, M., Urquijo Reguera, J., Blauhut, V., Stagge, J., and Stahl, K.: Methodological approach considering different factors influencing vulnerability – pan-european scale, DROUGHT-R&SP, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Veit-Blauhut/publication/331919810_Methodological_approach _considering_different_factors_influencing_vulnerability_-_pan-European_scale/links/5d5fb94a299bf1f70b05e126/ Methodological-approach-considering-different-factors-influencing-vulnerability-pan-European-scale.pdf (last access: 1 December 2023), 2015.
DWD: Climate Data Center (CDC) – German Meteorological Service (DWD), https://www.dwd.de/EN/climate_environment/cdc/cdc_node_en.html (last access: 1 December 2023), 2023.
Engelmann, I.: Journalistische Instrumentalisierung von Nachrichtenfaktoren. Einflüsse journalistischer Einstellungen auf simulierte Issue-, Quellen-und Statement-Entscheidungen, MK Medien Kommun., 58, 525–543, 2010.
Erfurt, M., Skiadaresis, G., Tijdeman, E., Blauhut, V., Bauhus, J., Glaser, R., Schwarz, J., Tegel, W., and Stahl, K.: A multidisciplinary drought catalogue for southwestern Germany dating back to 1801, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2979–2995, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2979-2020, 2020.
Erian, W., Pulwarty, R., and Vogt, J. V.: GAR Special Report on Drought 2021, https://www.undrr.org/publication/gar-special-report-drought-2021 (last access: 1 December 2023), 2021.
Ferraro, M. B. and Giordani, P.: Soft clustering, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat., 12, e1480, https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1480, 2020.
Fischer, E., Sippel, S., and Knutti, R.: Increasing probability of record-shattering climate extremes, Nat. Clim. Change, 11, 689–695, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01092-9, 2021.
Flach, M., Brenning, A., Gans, F., Reichstein, M., Sippel, S., and Mahecha, M. D.: Vegetation modulates the impact of climate extremes on gross primary production, Biogeosciences, 18, 39–53, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-39-2021, 2021.
Free, G., Van de Bund, W., Gawlik, B., Van Wijk, L., Wood, M., Guagnini, E., Koutelos, K., Annunziato, A., Grizzetti, B., Vigiak, O., Gnecchi, M., Poikane, S., Christiansen, T., Whalley, C., Antognazza, F., Zerger, B., Hoeve, R. J., and Stielstra, H.: An EU analysis of the ecological disaster in the Oder River of 2022, Publications Office of the European Union, https://doi.org/10.2760/067386, 2023.
Garrick, D. E., Schlager, E., De Stefano, L., and Villamayor-Tomas, S.: Managing the cascading risks of droughts: Institutional adaptation in transboundary river basins, Earths Future, 6, 809–827, https://doi.org/10.1002/2018EF000823, 2018.
Gnilke, A. and Sanders, T.: Forest fire history in Germany (2001–2020), Eberswalde Thünen Inst. For. Ecosyst., 2, 32a, https://doi.org/10.3220/PB1636643380000, 2021.
Google: Google Trends, https://trends.google.de/trends/ (last access: 1 December 2023), 2023.
Hahne, U., Adams, C., and von Kampen, D.-I. S.: Tourismusdestination Nordhessen im Klimawandel: Betroffenheit und Chancen durch den Klimawandel, Arbeitspapier “Klimawandel Anpassung Tour”, https://kobra.uni-kassel.de/bitstream/handle/123456789/2009121131469/Arbeitspapier1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (last access: 1 December 2023), 2009.
Hao, Z. and Singh, V. P.: Drought characterization from a multivariate perspective: A review, J. Hydrol., 527, 668–678, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.031, 2015.
Hedayat, H. and Kaboli, H. S.: Drought risk assessment: The importance of vulnerability factors interdependencies in regional drought risk management, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 100, 104152, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104152, 2024.
Holzwarth, S., Thonfeld, F., Abdullahi, S., Asam, S., Da Ponte Canova, E., Gessner, U., Huth, J., Kraus, T., Leutner, B., and Kuenzer, C.: Earth observation based monitoring of forests in Germany: A review, Remote Sens., 12, 3570, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213570, 2020.
Husson, F., Josse, J., and Pages, J.: Principal component methods-hierarchical clustering-partitional clustering: why would we need to choose for visualizing data, Technical Report of the Applied Mathematics Department (Agrocampus), 17, http://factominer.free.fr/more/HCPC_husson_josse.pdf (last access: 1 December 2023), 2010.
Ihinegbu, C. and Ogunwumi, T.: Multi-criteria modelling of drought: a study of Brandenburg Federal State, Germany, Model. Earth Syst. Environ., 8, 2035–2049, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-021-01197-2, 2022.
Kannenberg, S. A., Schwalm, C. R., and Anderegg, W. R.: Ghosts of the past: how drought legacy effects shape forest functioning and carbon cycling, Ecol. Lett., 23, 891–901, https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13485, 2020.
Ketchen, D. J. and Shook, C. L.: The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: an analysis and critique, Strateg. Manage. J., 17, 441–458, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199606)17:6<441::AID-SMJ819>3.0.CO;2-G, 1996.
Kim, J. E., Yu, J., Ryu, J.-H., Lee, J.-H., and Kim, T.-W.: Assessment of regional drought vulnerability and risk using principal component analysis and a Gaussian mixture model, Nat. Hazards, 109, 707–724, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04854-y, 2021.
Lawrence, J., Blackett, P., and Cradock-Henry, N. A.: Cascading climate change impacts and implications, Clim. Risk Manag., 29, 100234, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2020.100234, 2020.
Liguori, A., McEwen, L., Blake, J., and Wilson, M.: Towards “creative participatory science”: exploring future scenarios through specialist drought science and community storytelling, Front. Environ. Sci., 8, 589856, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.589856, 2021.
Lindner, M., Maroschek, M., Netherer, S., Kremer, A., Barbati, A., Garcia-Gonzalo, J., Seidl, R., Delzon, S., Corona, P., Kolström, M., Lexer, M. J., and Marchetti, M.: Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems, Forest Ecol. Manag., 259, 698–709, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.023, 2010.
Llasat, M. C., Llasat-Botija, M., and López, L.: A press database on natural risks and its application in the study of floods in Northeastern Spain, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 2049–2061, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-2049-2009, 2009.
Mahecha, M. D., Gans, F., Sippel, S., Donges, J. F., Kaminski, T., Metzger, S., Migliavacca, M., Papale, D., Rammig, A., and Zscheischler, J.: Detecting impacts of extreme events with ecological in situ monitoring networks, Biogeosciences, 14, 4255–4277, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4255-2017, 2017.
Matusick, G., Ruthrof, K. X., Kala, J., Brouwers, N. C., Breshears, D. D., and Hardy, G. E. S. J.: Chronic historical drought legacy exacerbates tree mortality and crown dieback during acute heatwave-compounded drought, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 095002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aad8cb, 2018.
McKnight, P. E. and Najab, J.: Mann–Whitney U Test, Corsini Encycl. Psychol., 1–1, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0524, 2010.
Meza, I., Hagenlocher, M., Naumann, G., Vogt, J., and Frischen, J.: Drought vulnerability indicators for global-scale drought risk assessments, Publications Office of the European Union, https://doi.org/10.2760/73844, 2019.
Miralles, D. G., Gentine, P., Seneviratne, S. I., and Teuling, A. J.: Land–atmospheric feedbacks during droughts and heatwaves: state of the science and current challenges, Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 1436, 19–35, https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13912, 2019.
Moravec, V., Markonis, Y., Rakovec, O., Svoboda, M., Trnka, M., Kumar, R., and Hanel, M.: Europe under multi-year droughts: how severe was the 2014–2018 drought period?, Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 034062, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe828, 2021.
Murtagh, F. and Contreras, P.: Algorithms for hierarchical clustering: an overview, WIRES Data Min. Knowl., 2, 86–97, 2012.
Niggli, L., Huggel, C., Muccione, V., Neukom, R., and Salzmann, N.: Towards improved understanding of cascading and interconnected risks from concurrent weather extremes: Analysis of historical heat and drought extreme events, PLOS Clim., 1, e0000057, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000057, 2022.
Noone, S., Broderick, C., Duffy, C., Matthews, T., Wilby, R. L., and Murphy, C.: A 250-year drought catalogue for the island of Ireland (1765–2015), Int. J. Climatol., 37, 239–254, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4999, 2017.
Peña-Angulo, D., Vicente-Serrano, S., Domínguez-Castro, F., Lorenzo-Lacruz, J., Murphy, C., Hannaford, J., Allan, R. P., Tramblay, Y., Reig-Gracia, F., and El Kenawy, A.: The complex and spatially diverse patterns of hydrological droughts across Europe, Water Resour. Res., 58, e2022WR031976, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR031976, 2022.
Rakovec, O., Samaniego, L., Hari, V., Markonis, Y., Moravec, V., Thober, S., Hanel, M., and Kumar, R.: The 2018–2020 Multi-Year Drought Sets a New Benchmark in Europe, Earths Future, 10, e2021EF002394, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002394, 2022.
Rannow, S., Loibl, W., Greiving, S., Gruehn, D., and Meyer, B. C.: Potential impacts of climate change in Germany – identifying regional priorities for adaptation activities in spatial planning, Landscape Urban Plan., 98, 160–171, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.017, 2010.
Reyer, C., Bachinger, J., Bloch, R., Hattermann, F., Ibisch, P., Kreft S., Lasch, P., Lucht, W., Nowicki, C., Spathelf, P., Stock, M., and Welp, M.: Climate change adaptation and sustainable regional development: a case study for the Federal State of Brandenburg, Germany, Reg. Environ. Change, 12, 523–542, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-011-0269-y, 2012.
Schmitt, J., Offermann, F., Söder, M., Frühauf, C., and Finger, R.: Extreme weather events cause significant crop yield losses at the farm level in German agriculture, Food Policy, 112, 102359, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102359, 2022.
Schuldt, B., Buras, A., Arend, M., Vitasse, Y., Beierkuhnlein, C., Damm, A., Gharun, M., Grams, T. E., Hauck, M., and Hajek, P.: A first assessment of the impact of the extreme 2018 summer drought on Central European forests, Basic Appl. Ecol., 45, 86–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2020.04.003, 2020.
Schütte, A. and Plothe, M.: Nachhaltige Forstwirtschaft im Zeichen des Klimawandels, in: Klimaschutz und Energiewende in Deutschland: Herausforderungen – Lösungsbeiträge – Zukunftsperspektiven, Springer, 767–794, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62022-9_37, 2022.
Shyrokaya, A., Pappenberger, F., Pechlivanidis, I., Messori, G., Khatami, S., Mazzoleni, M., and Di Baldassarre, G.: Advances and gaps in the science and practice of impact-based forecasting of droughts, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Water, 11, e1698, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1698, 2023.
Simpson, N. P., Mach, K. J., Constable, A., Hess J., Hogarth, R., Howden, M., Lawrence, J., Lempert, R. J., Muccione, V., Mackey, B., New, M. G., O'Neill, B., Otto, F., Pörtner, H., Reisinger, A., Roberts, D., Schmidt, D. N., Seneviratne, S., Strongin, S., van Aalst, M., Totin, E., and Trisos, C. H.: A framework for complex climate change risk assessment, One Earth, 4, 489–501, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.03.005, 2021.
Sodoge, J.: Drought impact statement dataset and code, Zenodo [code and data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7547488, 2023.
Sodoge, J.: jansodoge/drought_impact_profiles_paper: NHESS Code and Data, Zenodo [code and data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11127677, 2024.
Sodoge, J., Kuhlicke, C., and de Brito, M. M.: Automatized spatio-temporal detection of drought impacts from newspaper articles using natural language processing and machine learning, Weather Clim. Extrem., 41, 100574, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2023.100574, 2023.
Spellerberg, I. F. and Fedor, P. J.: A tribute to Claude Shannon (1916–2001) and a plea for more rigorous use of species richness, species diversity and the “Shannon–Wiener” Index, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 12, 177–179, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00015.x, 2003.
Stahl, K., Kohn, I., Blauhut, V., Urquijo, J., De Stefano, L., Acácio, V., Dias, S., Stagge, J. H., Tallaksen, L. M., Kampragou, E., Van Loon, A. F., Barker, L. J., Melsen, L. A., Bifulco, C., Musolino, D., de Carli, A., Massarutto, A., Assimacopoulos, D., and Van Lanen, H. A. J.: Impacts of European drought events: insights from an international database of text-based reports, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 801–819, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-801-2016, 2016.
Stephan, R., Terzi, S., Erfurt, M., Cocuccioni, S., Stahl, K., and Zebisch, M.: Assessing agriculture's vulnerability to drought in European pre-Alpine regions, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 45–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-45-2023, 2023.
Stephenson, N. L., Das, A. J., Ampersee, N. J., Cahill, K. G., Caprio, A. C., Sanders, J. E., and Williams, A. P.: Patterns and correlates of giant sequoia foliage dieback during California's 2012–2016 hotter drought, Forest Ecol. Manag., 419, 268–278, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.10.053, 2018.
Sutanto, S. J., van der Weert, M., Wanders, N., Blauhut, V., and Van Lanen, H. A.: Moving from drought hazard to impact forecasts, Nat. Commun., 10, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12840-z, 2019.
The Regional Database Germany: https://www.regionalstatistik.de/genesis/online, last access: 1 August 2023.
Thonfeld, F., Gessner, U., Holzwarth, S., Kriese, J., Da Ponte, E., Huth, J., and Kuenzer, C.: A First Assessment of Canopy Cover Loss in Germany's Forests after the 2018–2020 Drought Years, Remote Sens., 14, 562, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030562, 2022.
Thorndike, R.: Who belongs in the family?, Psychometrika, 18, 267–276, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289263, 1953.
Tijdeman, E., Blauhut, V., Stoelzle, M., Menzel, L., and Stahl, K.: Different drought types and the spatial variability in their hazard, impact, and propagation characteristics, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2099–2116, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2099-2022, 2022.
van der Wiel, K., Batelaan, T. J., and Wanders, N.: Large increases of multi-year droughts in north-western Europe in a warmer climate, Clim. Dynam., 60, 1781–1800, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06373-3, 2023.
Vijaya, Sharma S., and Batra, N.: Comparative study of single linkage, complete linkage, and ward method of agglomerative clustering, in: 2019 international conference on machine learning, big data, cloud and parallel computing (COMITCon), 568–573, https://doi.org/10.1109/COMITCon.2019.8862232, 2019.
Wieland, M. and Martinis, S.: Large-scale surface water change observed by Sentinel-2 during the 2018 drought in Germany, Int. J. Remote Sens., 41, 4742–4756, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1723817, 2020.
Wright, A. P., Wright, A. T., McCoy, A. B., and Sittig, D. F.: The use of sequential pattern mining to predict next prescribed medications, J. Biomed. Inform., 53, 73–80, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2014.09.003, 2015.
Yu, H., Zhang, Q., Sun, P., and Song, C.: Impact of droughts on winter wheat yield in different growth stages during 2001–2016 in Eastern China, Int. J. Disast. Risk Sci., 9, 376–391, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-018-0187-4, 2018.
Zaki, M. J.: SPADE: An efficient algorithm for mining frequent sequences, Mach. Learn., 42, 31–60, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007652502315, 2001.
Zambelli, A. E.: A data-driven approach to estimating the number of clusters in hierarchical clustering, F1000Research, 5, PMC5373427, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10103.1, 2016.
Zink, M., Samaniego, L., Kumar, R., Thober, S., Mai, J., Schäfer, D., and Marx, A.: The German drought monitor, Environ. Res. Lett., 11, 074002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074002, 2016.
Zscheischler, J. and Fischer, E. M.: The record-breaking compound hot and dry 2018 growing season in Germany, Weather Clim. Extrem., 29, 100270, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2020.100270, 2020.
Zscheischler, J., Reichstein, M., Harmeling, S., Rammig, A., Tomelleri, E., and Mahecha, M. D.: Extreme events in gross primary production: a characterization across continents, Biogeosciences, 11, 2909–2924, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-2909-2014, 2014.
Short summary
We delved into the socio-economic impacts of the 2018–2022 drought in Germany. We derived a dataset covering the impacts of droughts in Germany between 2000 and 2022 on sectors such as agriculture and forestry based on newspaper articles. Notably, our study illustrated that the longer drought had a wider reach and more varied effects. We show that dealing with longer droughts requires different plans compared to shorter ones, and it is crucial to be ready for the challenges they bring.
We delved into the socio-economic impacts of the 2018–2022 drought in Germany. We derived a...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint