Articles | Volume 26, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-571-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-571-2026
Research article
 | 
27 Jan 2026
Research article |  | 27 Jan 2026

Large discrepancies between event- and response-based compound flood hazard estimates

Sara Santamaria-Aguilar, Pravin Maduwantha, Alejandra R. Enriquez, and Thomas Wahl

Viewed

Total article views: 5,010 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,695 1,138 177 5,010 292 118 191
  • HTML: 3,695
  • PDF: 1,138
  • XML: 177
  • Total: 5,010
  • Supplement: 292
  • BibTeX: 118
  • EndNote: 191
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 May 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 May 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,010 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,974 with geography defined and 36 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 09 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
Traditional flood assessments use an event-based approach, assuming flood risk matches the chance of flood drivers. However, flooding also depends on topography and the spatio-temporal features of events. The response-based approach uses many events to estimate flood hazard directly. In Gloucester City (NJ, U.S.), we find that frequent events can cause rare (1 %) flood levels due to their spatio-temporal characteristics. Including these factors is key for accurate flood hazard estimates.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint