Articles | Volume 26, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-4353-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-4353-2026
Brief communication
 | 
08 Sep 2026
Brief communication |  | 08 Sep 2026

Brief communication: Keeping pace with human factors in avalanche decision-making – an update to the NHESS scoping review (2023–2026)

Audun Hetland, Olav K. Myksvoll, Tarjei Westerlund, Andrea Mannberg, and Rebecca A. Hetland

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3189', Benjamin Zweifel, 17 Jun 2026
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Audun Hetland, 24 Jul 2026
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3189', Philip A. Ebert, 24 Jun 2026
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Audun Hetland, 24 Jul 2026

Peer review completion

AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (27 Jul 2026) by Sven Fuchs
AR by Audun Hetland on behalf of the Authors (04 Aug 2026)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
Every year, people are caught in avalanches they themselves triggered, and most had some safety training. This study asked what research has learned about how people make decisions in avalanche terrain. We reviewed 35 recent studies and found growth concentrated in decision strategies and methods, with cognitive bias research notably absent. The findings point toward causal research designs and field-based education that meets recreationists where they actually are in the mountains.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint