Articles | Volume 26, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-4353-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Brief communication: Keeping pace with human factors in avalanche decision-making – an update to the NHESS scoping review (2023–2026)
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 08 Sep 2026)
- Preprint (discussion started on 12 Jun 2026)
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3189', Benjamin Zweifel, 17 Jun 2026
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Audun Hetland, 24 Jul 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3189', Philip A. Ebert, 24 Jun 2026
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Audun Hetland, 24 Jul 2026
Peer review completion
AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (27 Jul 2026) by Sven Fuchs
AR by Audun Hetland on behalf of the Authors (04 Aug 2026)
Manuscript
Thanks to the authors for this update, which keeps the overview of human-factor-related research in avalanche terrain up to date. I recommend accepting the manuscript in its current form. I have only one minor comment.
The term New Work (as used in the abstract) appears to be used somewhat inaccurately in this context. New Work traditionally refers to a broader concept encompassing autonomy, meaningful work, self-determination, and organisational transformation. The authors may wish to reconsider the use of this term or clarify its intended meaning. If the authors simply refer to newly published studies, the term “new studies” may be more appropriate.