Dear authors, your manuscript has now been evaluated by two reviewers. Based on their evaluation, your replies on the discussion stage and my own evaluation, the manuscript is returned for a major and mandatory revision. Please reply carefully to all the questions of the reviewers and implement the corresponding changes in the manuscript. In case you have not fully followed their comments, please provide a detailed justification.
Best regards
Joaquim Pinto
(handling editor).

Dear authors, your manuscript has now been re-evaluated by two reviewers, which are generally happy with the changes. Reviewer 2 asks for some minor changes, and it particularly this one is quite important

4. Please mention the use of Pseudo Global Warming method in the summary and conclusion. This is a pilar of your research and has not been mentioned. Mention its use to simulate past, present and future conditions. And highlight why is it relevant for this research. It means, you are not taking just a set of random TCs in a climatological dataset, but you are simulating specific events in different climates.

Therefore, the manuscript is returned for a hopefully straightforward minor revision, looking forward to recieving the updated version!
best regards
Joaquim Pinto
(handling editor)

Dear authors,
thanks for the revised version, which I am happy to accept for publication! The manuscript will now be forwarded to production.
thanks to submitting your original work to our journal
best regards
Joaquim Pinto
(handling editor)