Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
NHESS
Articles | Volume 26, issue 7
Articles | Volume 26, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-3273-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-3273-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 26, issue 7
Research article
 | 
15 Jul 2026
Research article |  | 15 Jul 2026

Benefits of the simplified MEV for analyzing hourly precipitation extremes in a changing climate

Marc Lennartz, Benjamin Poschlod, and Bruno Merz

Viewed

Total article views: 2,644 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,536 851 257 2,644 410 175 206
  • HTML: 1,536
  • PDF: 851
  • XML: 257
  • Total: 2,644
  • Supplement: 410
  • BibTeX: 175
  • EndNote: 206
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Jan 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Jan 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,644 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,535 with geography defined and 109 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 16 Sep 2026
Download
Short summary
Predicting hourly rainfall extremes under climate change is crucial yet highly uncertain. Using convection-permitting climate model data over Germany, we compare stationary and non-stationary general extreme value (GEV) and simplified metastatistical extreme value (sMEV) methods. We show that the sMEV approach exhibits lower uncertainty across return periods. Moreover, the non-stationary sMEV better captures climate-change-induced changes, though care is needed when projecting future extremes.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint