Bayless, J. and Abrahamson, N. A.: Summary of the BA18 ground-motion model for Fourier amplitude spectra for crustal earthquakes in California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 109, 2088–2105,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120190077, 2019.
a
Bergamo, P., Hammer, C., and Fäh, D.: On the relation between empirical amplification and proxies measured at Swiss and Japanese stations: Systematic regression analysis and neural network prediction of amplification, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 111, 101–120,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120200228, 2021.
a
Bergamo, P., Hammer, C., and Fäh, D.: Correspondence between Site Amplification and Topographical, Geological Parameters: Collation of Data from Swiss and Japanese Stations, and Neural Networks-Based Prediction of Local Response, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 112, 1008–1030,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120210225, 2022.
a,
b
Bindi, D., Spallarossa, D., and Pacor, F.: Between-event and between-station variability observed in the Fourier and response spectra domains: comparison with seismological models, Geophys. J. Int., 210, 1092–1104,
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx217, 2017.
a
Boore, D. M., Thompson, E. M., and Cadet, H.: Regional correlations of VS 30 and velocities averaged over depths less than and greater than 30 meters, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 101, 3046–3059,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110071, 2011.
a
Bora, S. S., Cotton, F., and Scherbaum, F.: NGA-West2 empirical Fourier and duration models to generate adjustable response spectra, Earthq. Spectra, 35, 61–93,
https://doi.org/10.1193/110317EQS228M, 2019.
a
CEN: Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance – part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels,
https://www.saiglobal.com/PDFTemp/Previews/OSH/IS/EN/2005/I.S.EN1998-1-2005.pdf (last access: 21 February 2024), 2004. a
Crowley, H., Dabbeek, J., Despotaki, V., Rodrigues, D., Martins, L., Silva, V., Romão, X., Pereira, N., Weatherill, G., and Danciu, L.: European seismic risk model (ESRM20), EFEHR Technical Report, 002 V1.0.1, ETH Zürich, 1–85 ,
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000590388, 2021.
a,
b,
c
Cultrera, G., Cornou, C., Di Giulio, G., and Bard, P.-Y.: Indicators for site characterization at seismic station: recommendation from a dedicated survey, Bull. Earthq. Eng., 19, 4171–4195,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01136-7, 2021.
a
Derras, B., Bard, P. Y., and Cotton, F.:
VS30, slope,
H800 and
f0: Performance of various site-condition proxies in reducing ground-motion aleatory variability and predicting nonlinear site response 4. Seismology, Earth Planets Space, 69, 133,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0718-z, 2017.
a,
b
Edwards, B., Michel, C., Poggi, V., and Fäh, D.: Determination of site amplification from regional seismicity: application to the Swiss National Seismic Networks, Seismol. Res. Lett., 84, 611–621,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0220120176, 2013.
a
Foster, K. M., Bradley, B. A., McGann, C. R., and Wotherspoon, L. M.: A
VS30 map for New Zealand based on geologic and terrain proxy variables and field measurements, Earthq. Spectra, 35, 1865–1897,
https://doi.org/10.1193/121118EQS281M, 2019.
a
Holbrook, W. S., Riebe, C. S., Elwaseif, M., L. Hayes, J., Basler-Reeder, K., L. Harry, D., Malazian, A., Dosseto, A., C. Hartsough, P., and W. Hopmans, J.: Geophysical constraints on deep weathering and water storage potential in the Southern Sierra Critical Zone Observatory, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 39, 366–380,
https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3502, 2014.
a
Hollender, F., Roumelioti, Z., Maufroy, E., Traversa, P., and Mariscal, A.: Can we trust high-frequency content in strong-motion database signals? Impact of housing, coupling, and installation depth of seismic sensors, Seismol. Res. Lett., 91, 2192–2205,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190163, 2020.
a
Kotha, S. R., Bindi, D., and Cotton, F.: Site-corrected magnitude-and region-dependent correlations of horizontal peak spectral amplitudes, Earthq. Spectra, 33, 1415–1432,
https://doi.org/10.1193/091416eqs150m, 2017.
a
Kotha, S. R., Cotton, F., and Bindi, D.: A new approach to site classification: mixed-effects ground motion prediction equation with spectral clustering of site amplification functions, Soil Dynam. Earthq. Eng., 110, 318–329,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.051, 2018.
a,
b,
c,
d
Kotha, S. R., Weatherill, G., Bindi, D., and Cotton, F.: A regionally-adaptable ground-motion model for shallow crustal earthquakes in Europe, Bull. Earthq. Eng., 18, 4091–4125,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00869-1, 2020.
a
Kotha, S. R., Bindi, D., and Cotton, F.: A regionally adaptable ground-motion model for fourier amplitude spectra of shallow crustal earthquakes in Europe, Bull. Earthq. Eng., 20, 711–740,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01255-1, 2022.
a,
b,
c,
d
Ktenidou, O.-J., Roumelioti, Z., Abrahamson, N., Cotton, F., Pitilakis, K., and Hollender, F.: Understanding single-station ground motion variability and uncertainty (sigma): lessons learnt from EUROSEISTEST, Bull. Earthq. Eng., 16, 2311–2336,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0098-6, 2018.
a
Lanzano, G., Sgobba, S., Luzi, L., Puglia, R., Pacor, F., Felicetta, C., D'Amico, M., Cotton, F., and Bindi, D.: The pan-European Engineering Strong Motion (ESM) flatfile: compilation criteria and data statistics, Bul. Earthq. Eng., 17, 561–582,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0480-z, 2019.
a,
b
Lemoine, A., Douglas, J., and Cotton, F.: Testing the applicability of correlations between topographic slope and
VS30 for Europe, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 102, 2585–2599,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110240, 2012.
a,
b
Li, M., Rathje, E. M., Cox, B. R., and Yust, M.: A Texas-specific
VS30 map incorporating geology and
VS30 observations, Earthq. Spectra, 38, 521–542,
https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930211033622, 2022.
a
Loviknes, K., Kotha, S. R., Cotton, F., and Schorlemmer, D.: Testing nonlinear amplification factors of ground-motion models, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 111, 2121–2137,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120200386, 2021.
a
Luzi, L., Lanzano, G., Felicetta, C., D'Amico, M., Russo, E., Sgobba, S., and Pacor, F.: ORFEUS Working Group 5: Engineering Strong Motion Database (ESM) (Version 2.0), INGV – Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia [data set],
https://doi.org/10.13127/ESM.2, 2020.
a,
b,
c
Melgar, D., Taymaz, T., Ganas, A., Crowell, B., Öcalan, T., Kahraman, M., Tsironi, V., Yolsal-Çevikbilen, S., Valkaniotis, S., Irmak, T. S., Eken, T., Erman, C., Özkan, B., Dogan, A. H., and Altuntaş, C.: Sub- and super-shear ruptures during the 2023
Mw 7.8 and
Mw 7.6 earthquake doublet in SE Türkiye, Seismica, 2, 2,
https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v2i3.387, 2023.
a,
b
Mori, F., Mendicelli, A., Moscatelli, M., Romagnoli, G., Peronace, E., and Naso, G.: A new
VS30 map for Italy based on the seismic microzonation dataset, Eng. Geol., 275, 105745,
https://doi.org/10.17632/8458tgzc73.1, 2020.
a
Nakano, K., Matsushima, S., and Kawase, H.: Statistical properties of strong ground motions from the generalized spectral inversion of data observed by K-NET, KiK-net, and the JMA Shindokei network in Japan, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 105, 2662–2680,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140349, 2015.
a
Paolucci, R., Aimar, M., Ciancimino, A., Dotti, M., Foti, S., Lanzano, G., Mattevi, P., Pacor, F., and Vanini, M.: Checking the site categorization criteria and amplification factors of the 2021 draft of Eurocode 8 Part 1–1, Bull. Earthq. Eng., 19, 4199–4234,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01118-9, 2021.
a
Pelletier, J. D., Broxton, P. D., Hazenberg, P., Zeng, X., Troch, P. A., Niu, G.-Y., Williams, Z., Brunke, M. A., and Gochis, D.: A gridded global data set of soil, intact regolith, and sedimentary deposit thicknesses for regional and global land surface modeling, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 8, 41–65,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000526, 2016a.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h,
i,
j,
k,
l,
m,
n
Pelletier, J. D., Broxton, P. D., Hazenberg, P., Zeng, X., Troch, P. A., Niu, G.-Y., Williams, Z., Brunke, M. A., and Gochis, D.: Global 1-km Gridded Thickness of Soil, Regolith, and Sedimentary Deposit Layers, ORNL DACC [data set],
https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1304, 2016b.
a,
b
Petersen, G. M., Büyükakpinar, P., Vera Sanhueza, F. O., Metz, M., Cesca, S., Akbayram, K., Saul, J., and Dahm, T.: The 2023 Southeast Türkiye Seismic Sequence: Rupture of a Complex Fault Network, Seismic Rec., 3, 134–143,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0320230008, 2023.
a,
b
Rodriguez-Marek, A., Cotton, F., Abrahamson, N. A., Akkar, S., Al Atik, L., Edwards, B., Montalva, G. A., and Dawood, H. M.: A model for single-station standard deviation using data from various tectonic regions, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 103, 3149–3163,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120130030, 2013.
a
Seyhan, E. and Stewart, J. P.: Semi-empirical nonlinear site amplification from NGA-West2 data and simulations, Earthq. Spectra, 30, 1241–1256,
https://doi.org/10.1193/063013EQS181M, 2014.
a
Silva, V., Amo-Oduro, D., Calderon, A., Costa, C., Dabbeek, J., Despotaki, V., Martins, L., Pagani, M., Rao, A., Simionato, M., Viganò, D., Yepes-Estrada, C., Acevedo, A., Crowley, H., Horspool, N., Jaiswal, K., Journeay, M., and Pittore, M.: Development of a global seismic risk model, Earthq. Spectra, 36, 372–394,
https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019899953, 2020.
a
Stewart, J. P., Afshari, K., and Goulet, C. A.: Non-ergodic site response in seismic hazard analysis, Earthq. Spectra, 33, 1385–1414,
https://doi.org/10.1193/081716eqs135m, 2017.
a,
b
Thompson, E., Wald, D. J., and Worden, C.: A
VS30 Map for California with Geologic and Topographic Constraints, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 104, 2313–2321,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120130312, 2014.
a
Thompson, E. M., Baise, L. G., Kayen, R. E., Tanaka, Y., and Tanaka, H.: A geostatistical approach to mapping site response spectral amplifications, Eng. Geol., 114, 330–342,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.05.010, 2010.
a
Vilanova, S. P., Narciso, J., Carvalho, J. P., Lopes, I., Quinta-Ferreira, M., Pinto, C. C., Moura, R., Borges, J., and Nemser, E. S.: Developing a Geologically Based
VS30 Site-Condition Model for Portugal: Methodology and Assessment of the Performance of ProxiesDeveloping a Geologically Based
VS30 Site-Condition Model for Portugal, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 108, 322–337,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170213, 2018.
a,
b,
c
Wald, D. J. and Allen, T. I.: Topographic slope as a proxy for seismic site conditions and amplification, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97, 1379–1395,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060267, 2007.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h,
i,
j,
k,
l
Wang, Z., Nakano, K., Ito, E., Kawase, H., and Matsushima, S.: A hybrid approach for deriving horizontal site amplification factors considering both the similarity of HVSRe and the vertical amplification correction function, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 52, 128–146, 2023. a
Weatherill, G., Kotha, S. R., and Cotton, F.: Re-thinking site amplification in regional seismic risk assessment, Earthq. Spectra, 36, 274–297,
https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019899956, 2020.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h
Weatherill, G., Crowley, H., Roullé, A., Tourlière, B., Lemoine, A., Gracianne, C., Kotha, S. R., and Cotton, F.: Modelling site response at regional scale for the 2020 European Seismic Risk Model (ESRM20), Bull. Earthq. Eng., 21, 665–714,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01526-5, 2023.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h,
i,
j,
k
Weatherill, G. A., Crowley, H., Roullé, A., Tourlière, B., Lemoine, A., Gracianne Hidalgo, C., Kotha, S. R., Cotton, F., and Dabbeek, J.: European Site Response Model Datasets Viewer (v1.0), European Site Response Model Datasets Viewer [data set],
https://doi.org/10.7414/EUC-EUROPEAN-SITE-MODEL-DATA-VIEWER, 2021.
a
Zhu, C., Weatherill, G., Cotton, F., Pilz, M., Kwak, D. Y., and Kawase, H.: An open-source site database of strong-motion stations in Japan: K-NET and KiK-net (v1. 0.0), Earthq. Spectra, 37, 2126–2149,
https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020988028, 2021.
a,
b
Zhu, C., Cotton, F., Kawase, H., Haendel, A., Pilz, M., and Nakano, K.: How well can we predict earthquake site response so far? Site-specific approaches, Earthq. Spectra, 38, 1047–1075,
https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930211060859, 2022.
a,
b
