Articles | Volume 24, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1223-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1223-2024
Research article
 | 
05 Apr 2024
Research article |  | 05 Apr 2024

Exploring inferred geomorphological sediment thickness as a new site proxy to predict ground-shaking amplification at regional scale: application to Europe and eastern Türkiye

Karina Loviknes, Fabrice Cotton, and Graeme Weatherill

Related authors

Strategies for comparison of modern probabilistic seismic hazard models and insights from the Germany and France border region
Graeme Weatherill, Fabrice Cotton, Guillaume Daniel, Irmela Zentner, Pablo Iturrieta, and Christian Bosse
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3755–3787, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3755-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3755-2024, 2024
Short summary
The 2020 European Seismic Hazard Model: overview and results
Laurentiu Danciu, Domenico Giardini, Graeme Weatherill, Roberto Basili, Shyam Nandan, Andrea Rovida, Céline Beauval, Pierre-Yves Bard, Marco Pagani, Celso G. Reyes, Karin Sesetyan, Susana Vilanova, Fabrice Cotton, and Stefan Wiemer
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3049–3073, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3049-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3049-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modelling seismic ground motion and its uncertainty in different tectonic contexts: challenges and application to the 2020 European Seismic Hazard Model (ESHM20)
Graeme Weatherill, Sreeram Reddy Kotha, Laurentiu Danciu, Susana Vilanova, and Fabrice Cotton
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1795–1834, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1795-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1795-2024, 2024
Short summary
Enriching the GEOFON seismic catalog with automatic energy magnitude estimations
Dino Bindi, Riccardo Zaccarelli, Angelo Strollo, Domenico Di Giacomo, Andres Heinloo, Peter Evans, Fabrice Cotton, and Frederik Tilmann
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 1733–1745, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1733-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1733-2024, 2024
Short summary
The communication strategy for the release of the first European Seismic Risk Model and the updated European Seismic Hazard Model
Irina Dallo, Michèle Marti, Nadja Valenzuela, Helen Crowley, Jamal Dabbeek, Laurentiu Danciu, Simone Zaugg, Fabrice Cotton, Domenico Giardini, Rui Pinho, John F. Schneider, Céline Beauval, António A. Correia, Olga-Joan Ktenidou, Päivi Mäntyniemi, Marco Pagani, Vitor Silva, Graeme Weatherill, and Stefan Wiemer
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 291–307, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-291-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-291-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Earthquake Hazards
Dynamic fragility of a slender rock pillar in a carbonate rock mass
Alaa Jbara and Michael Tsesarsky
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2197–2213, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2197-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2197-2025, 2025
Short summary
Lesser Antilles seismotectonic zoning model for seismic hazard assessment
Océane Foix, Stéphane Mazzotti, Hervé Jomard, Didier Bertil, and the Lesser Antilles Working Group
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1881–1900, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1881-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1881-2025, 2025
Short summary
Consistency between a strain rate model and the ESHM20 earthquake rate forecast in Europe: insights for seismic hazard
Bénédicte Donniol Jouve, Anne Socquet, Céline Beauval, Jesus Piña Valdès, and Laurentiu Danciu
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1789–1809, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1789-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1789-2025, 2025
Short summary
A grid-level fixed-asset model developed for China from 1951 to 2020
Danhua Xin, James Edward Daniell, Zhenguo Zhang, Friedemann Wenzel, Shaun Shuxun Wang, and Xiaofei Chen
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1597–1620, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1597-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1597-2025, 2025
Short summary
An Updated, Homogeneous, and Declustered Earthquake Catalog for South Korea and Neighboring Regions
Soumya Kanti Maiti and Byungmin Kim
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-197,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-197, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for NHESS
Short summary

Cited articles

Al Atik, L., Abrahamson, N., Bommer, J. J., Scherbaum, F., Cotton, F., and Kuehn, N.: The variability of ground-motion prediction models and its components, Seismol. Res. Lett., 81, 794–801, https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.81.5.794, 2010. a, b
Allen, T. I. and Wald D. J.: Topographic slope as a proxy for seismic site-conditions (VS30) and amplification around the globe, US Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept. 2007-1357, 69 pp., US Geological Survey [data set], https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20071357, 2007. a
Amemiya, T.: Tobit models: A survey, J. Econometr., 24, 3–61, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(84)90074-5, 1984. a
Atkinson, G. M.: Single-station sigma, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, 446–455, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050137, 2006. a
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., and Walker, S. C.: Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4, J. Stat. Softw., 67, 1–48, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01, 2015. a
Download
Short summary
Earthquake ground shaking can be strongly affected by local geology and is often amplified by soft sediments. In this study, we introduce a global geomorphological model for sediment thickness as a protentional parameter for predicting this site amplification. The results show that including geology and geomorphology in site-amplification predictions adds important value and that global or regional models for sediment thickness from fields beyond engineering seismology are worth considering.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint