Dear Authors,
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to the Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS). Your paper “Current and Future Climate Compound-Event Flood Impact on Coastal Critical Infrastructures“ has been critically reviewed by outside peer reviewers. After the discussion round, the reviewers recommend reconsideration of your paper following major revisions. We invite you to resubmit your corrected manuscript after addressing all reviewer comments.
When resubmitting your manuscript, please carefully consider all issues mentioned in the reviewers' comments. For a revised manuscript version, in order to make it easier and faster for the reviewers to check the final manuscript, we require two separate documents:
1. Author response, it is Revision Notes explaining how and where (citing line number) each point of the Editor's/Reviewers' comments has been addressed. Should you disagree with any part of the reviews, please explain why. At the end of this revision notes a version of the revised manuscript showing the new/changed text using track changes or highlighting. To facilitate further review, add line numbers in the text.
2. A version of the revised manuscript without showing the new/changed text using track changes or highlighting.
Final acceptance is, however, contingent upon satisfactory revision along the lines suggested. Please be sure to upload your revised manuscript back to the electronic system.
Sincerely,
Mauricio González
NHESS Editor

Dear Authors,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to the Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS). Your paper “Current and Future Climate Compound-Event Flood Impact on Coastal Critical Infrastructures “ has been critically reviewed by outside peer reviewers. The reviewers recommend reconsideration of your paper following minor revision. We invite you to resubmit your manuscript after addressing all reviewer comments. Please, pay attention to the comments of Referee 2, mainly in regards The “Concluding remarks”

When resubmitting your manuscript, please carefully consider all issues mentioned in the reviewers' comments, outline every change made point by point, and provide suitable rebuttals for any comments not addressed. I will not reiterate the details of the various suggestions because they seem clear enough. I hope that you find these comments useful and I will anticipate receiving your revision in due course.

Final acceptance is, however, contingent upon satisfactory revision along the lines suggested. Please be sure to upload your revised manuscript back to the electronic database.

Sincerely,
Mauricio González
Associated Editor NHESS

Dear Mrs Khanam,

Your last corrected version of the paper “Impact of Compound Flood Event on Coastal Critical Infrastructures Considering Current and Future Climate” including the last comments of the reviewers have been satisfactorily revised by I. I am pleased to report that the results of the peer review process are favorable and I accept to publish the paper as is.

Sincerely,

Mauricio González