Thank you for provide the answers to all the reviewers comments. Please provide the revised version of the manuscript.

Best regards

The manuscript has improved a lot from its previous version. Many thanks for your effort. Anyway the reviewers have few minor suggestions to improve the manuscript:
- Page 4, line 7 change CLC by CORINE Land Cover
- Page 4, line 12 INE is not necessary you can delete.
- Page 4, line 14 you can delete Vegetation Condition Index, you have introduce the acronym in page 3 line 26. The same for the Temperature Condition Index
- The recent paper of Leng and Hall 2019 could be useful in the introduction and/or discussion section, to provide a world context of the use of copulas in the estimation of yield loss risk under droughts.
Leng, G., & Hall, J. (2019). Crop yield sensitivity of global major agricultural countries to droughts and the projected changes in the future. Science of the Total Environment, 654, 811-82
- Page 11, line 7: please use "hazardous events" instead "hazard events"
- The final paragraph of page 11, first paragraphs on page 12: Usually discussion does not include calls to Figures or specific data from figures. Instead it should be formulated as general statements, as for instance:
Instead
“While in Fig. 5 the values of PNE the crop-loss threshold range between 22% (wheat in cluster 1) and 19.2% (barley in cluster 2)…”
You could say
“While values of PNE the crop-loss threshold were low and similar for wheat in cluster 1 and barley in cluster 2….”
etc., (remove also Figure 5 from page 12, line 11)
- Conclusions: I appreciate the synthesis effort, but some improvements are still possible. Please remove calls to figures. Do not use the technical names of variables but the represented concepts instead (probability of xxx, standard deviation, variability, etc.). Numerical values (unless really outstanding) should be avoided, use general description (low, moderate, high risk, etc).