The authors answered most of the reviewers’ comments. I do agree with the authors that the most important aspect of this paper is the fact that they test the vulnerability models in a real case event whereas most of these applications are used in hypothetical scenarios. I do appreciate the fact that the authors do some modifications in the vulnerability model. Particular attention should be given to the comment by referee 3 on the need to check the terms related to tsunami inundation. The international scientific community uses words such as Inundation height, Flow depth (or inundation depth) and Run-up.
Having said that I believe that the authors should produce a revised manuscript including the reviewers’ comments. I invite the authors to submit the revised paper.

The authors successfully answered most of the reviewers comments.
The manuscript can now be accepted for publication