Articles | Volume 26, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-4723-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-4723-2026
Research article
 | 
02 Oct 2026
Research article |  | 02 Oct 2026

Seasonal influence on post-fire debris flow likelihood after the 2020 Lake Fire

Jeng-Hann Chong, Adit Ghosh, Brandon T. Page, Greg Jesmok, Denise V. Berg, Marlene Lopez, Deepshikha Upadhyay, David J. Stone, Scott C. Hauswirth, Eric O. Lindsey, and Louis A. Scuderi

Viewed

Total article views: 3,369 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,208 970 191 3,369 460 147 145
  • HTML: 2,208
  • PDF: 970
  • XML: 191
  • Total: 3,369
  • Supplement: 460
  • BibTeX: 147
  • EndNote: 145
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Oct 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Oct 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,369 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,339 with geography defined and 30 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 02 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Post-fire debris flows or mudflows, can occur during intense rainfall following wildfires. Yet, it remains unclear how seasonal variation affects debris-flow initiation years after the fire. Using simulations of the 2020 Lake Fire in California, we show that debris-flow likelihood varies drastically between drier and wetter months, even four years after the fire. This study highlights the need to consider climatic and seasonal patterns in post-fire debris-flow assessment.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint