Bremicker, M.: Das Wasserhaushaltsmodell LARSIM – Modellgrundlagen und Anwendungsbeispiele, Freiburger Schriften zur Hydrologie, Institut für Hydrologie der Universität Freiburg i. Br., Freiburg i. Br., Germany,
https://www.hydrology.uni-freiburg.de/publika/FSH-Bd11-Bremicker.pdf (last access: 22 September 2026), 2000. a
Carrera, L., Standari, G., Bosello, F., and Mysiak, J.: Assessing Direct and Indirect Economic Impacts of a Flood Event Through the Integration of Spatial and Computational General Equilibrium Modelling, Environ. Model. Softw., 63, 109–122,
https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep01092 (last access: 17 August 2026), 2014. a
Curran, A., de Bruijn, K., Klerk, W., and Kok, M.: Large Scale Flood Hazard Analysis by Including Defence Failures on the Dutch River System, Water, 11, 1732,
https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081732, 2019.
a,
b
Curran, A., de Bruijn, K., Domeneghetti, A., Bianchi, F., Kok, M., Vorogushyn, S., and Castellarin, A.: Large-scale stochastic flood hazard analysis applied to the Po River, Nat. Hazards, 104, 2027–2049,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04260-w, 2020.
a,
b
CUR/TAW: Probabilistic design of flood defences. Report 141., Technical Advisory Committee on Water Defences, Center for Civil Engineering Research and Codes, Gouda, the Netherlands, ISBN 978-9037600001, 1990. a
de Bruijn, K., Wagenaar, D., Slager, K., de Bel, M., and Burzel, A.: Updated and improved method for flood damage assessment: SSM2015 (version 2), Tech. rep., Deltares, Delft,
https://open.rijkswaterstaat.nl/@273917/updated-and-improved-method-for-flood/ (last access: 22 September 2026), 2015. a
Deltares: SOBEK. Hydrodynamics, Rainfall Runoff and Realtime Control, User Manual, Tech. rep., Delft,
https://content.oss.deltares.nl/sobek2/SOBEK_User_Manual.pdf (last access: 22 September 2026), 2018. a
de Moel, H., Jongman, B., Kreibich, H., Merz, B., Penning-Rowsell, E., and Ward, P. J.: Flood risk assessments at different spatial scales, Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Gl., 20, 865–890,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9654-z, 2015.
a
Domeneghetti, A., Vorogushyn, S., Castellarin, A., Merz, B., and Brath, A.: Probabilistic flood hazard mapping: effects of uncertain boundary conditions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3127–3140,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3127-2013, 2013.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
Förster, S., Kneis, D., Gocht, M., and Bronstert, A.: Flood risk reduction by the use of retention areas at the Elbe River, International Journal of River Basin Management, 3, 21–29,
https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2005.9635242, 2005.
a,
b
Gamper, C. D., Thöni, M., and Weck-Hannemann, H.: A conceptual approach to the use of Cost Benefit and Multi Criteria Analysis in natural hazard management, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 293–302,
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-6-293-2006, 2006.
a
geomer GmbH and Ruiz Rodriguez + Zeisler + Blank, GbR: Bewertung des Hochwasserrisikos auf der Grundlage von Schadenspotenzialen – Anwendung von Schadensfunktionen in repräsentativen Beispielsregionen im Rahmen des Länderfinanzierungsprogramms “Wasser, Boden und Abfall 2020”, Tech. rep.,
https://www.laenderfinanzierungsprogramm.de/static/LFP/Dateien/LAWA/Sonstige/H_4.20.21%20Abschlussbericht_SchadenpotentialBEAM_%2814.07.22%29.pdf (last access: 22 September 2026), 2022.
a,
b
Gouldby, B., Sayers, P., Mulet-Marti, J., Hassan, M. A. A. M., and Benwell, D.: A methodology for regional-scale flood risk assessment, P. I. Civil Eng.-Wat. M.,
https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.2008.161.3.169, 2008.
a,
b
Guan, X., Nguyen, V. D., Voit, P., Merz, B., Heistermann, M., and Vorogushyn, S.: The ability of a stochastic regional weather generator to reproduce heavy-precipitation events across scales, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3075–3086,
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3075-2025, 2025.
a
Hall, J. and Solomatine, D.: A framework for uncertainty analysis in flood risk management decisions, International Journal of River Basin Management, 6, 85–98,
https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2008.9635339, 2008.
a,
b,
c,
d
Hall, J. W., Dawson, R. J., Sayers, P. B., Rosu, C., Chatterton, J. B., and Deakin, R.: A methodology for national-scale flood risk assessment, P. I. Civil Eng.-Water, 156, 235–247,
https://doi.org/10.1680/wame.2003.156.3.235, 2003.
a,
b
IPCC: Summary for Policymakers, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA, ISBN 9789291691388, 2013. a
Kamrath, P., Disse, M., Hammer, M., and Köngeter, J.: Assessment of Discharge through a Dike Breach and Simulation of Flood Wave Propagation, Nat. Hazards, 38, 63–78,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-005-8600-x, 2006.
a
Koks, E. E., Bočkarjova, M., de Moel, H., and Aerts, J. C. J. H.: Integrated Direct and Indirect Flood Risk Modeling: Development and Sensitivity Analysis, Risk Anal., 35, 882–900,
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12300, 2015.
a
Ludwig, R., Wood, R. R., Willkofer, F., Mittermeier, M., Böhnisch, A., and Poschlod, B.: Klimawandel und Extremereignisse. Risiken und Perspektiven für die Bayerische Wasserwirtschaft, Abschlussbericht, München, Germany, 2019.
a,
b
Merz, B., Hall, J., Disse, M., and Schumann, A.: Fluvial flood risk management in a changing world, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 509–527,
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-509-2010, 2010a.
a,
b,
c,
d
Merz, B., Kreibich, H., Schwarze, R., and Thieken, A.: Review article “Assessment of economic flood damage”, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 1697–1724,
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-1697-2010, 2010b.
a
Merz, B., Nguyen, D., Guse, B., Kreibich, H., Sairam, N., Apel, H., Farrag, M., Han, L., and Vorogushyn, S.: Kontinuierliche, räumlich verteilte Langzeitsimulation zur Abschätzung des Hochwasserrisikos für Deutschland, Hydrologie & Wasserbewirtschaftung, 68,
https://doi.org/10.5675/HYWA_2024.4_2, 2024.
a
Messner, F., Penning-Rowsell, E., Green, C., Meyer, V., Tunstall, S., and Veen, A.: Evaluating flood damage: guidance and recommendations on principles and methods, Tech. rep., FLOOD Site Project Report,
https://cepri.info/tl_files/pdf/messnerf2007a.pdf (last access: 22 September 2026), 2007.
a,
b,
c,
d
Metin, A. D., Dung, N. V., Schröter, K., Guse, B., Apel, H., Kreibich, H., Vorogushyn, S., and Merz, B.: How do changes along the risk chain affect flood risk?, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3089–3108,
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-3089-2018, 2018.
a
Olesen, L., Löwe, R., and Arnbjerb-Nielsen, K.: Flood Damage Assessment. Literature review and recommended procedure, Tech. rep., Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia, ISBN 978-1-921912-39-9, 2017. a
Petrow, T., Thieken, A. H., Kreibich, H., Merz, B., and Bahlburg, C. H.: Improvements on Flood Alleviation in Germany: Lessons Learned from the Elbe Flood in August 2002, Environ. Manage., 38, 717–732,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-6291-4, 2006.
a
Pfurtscheller, C.: Regional economic impacts of natural hazards – the case of the 2005 Alpine flood event in Tyrol (Austria), Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 359–378,
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-359-2014, 2014.
a
Pianosi, F., Beven, K., Freer, J., Hall, J. W., Rougier, J., Stephenson, D. B., and Wagener, T.: Sensitivity analysis of environmental models: A systematic review with practical workflow, Environ. Model. Softw., 79, 214–232,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.008, 2016.
a
Sairam, N., Brill, F., Sieg, T., Farrag, M., Kellermann, P., Nguyen, V. D., Lüdtke, S., Merz, B., Schröter, K., Vorogushyn, S., and Kreibich, H.: Process‐Based Flood Risk Assessment for Germany, Earths Future, 9, e2021EF002259,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002259, 2021.
a,
b,
c
Schulla, J. and Jasper, K.: Model description WaSiM-ETH, Zürich, Switzerland,
https://www.wasim.ch/downloads/doku/wasim/wasim_2007_en.pdf (last access: 21 September 2026), 2007. a
Schultz, M. T., Gouldby, B. P., Simm, J. D., and Wibowo, J. L.: Beyond the Factor of Safety: Developing Fragility Curves to Characterize System Reliability, Tech. rep., Defense Technical Information Center, Fort Belvoir, VA,
https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA525580, 2010.
a
Sieg, T., Schinko, T., Vogel, K., Mechler, R., Merz, B., and Kreibich, H.: Integrated assessment of short-term direct and indirect economic flood impa
cts including uncertainty quantification, PLOS ONE, 14, e0212932,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212932, 2019.
a
Straub, D., Betz, W., Ruf, M., Hoffmann, A., Landgraf, A., Friedli, L., and Papaioannou, I.: Sensitivity measures for engineering and environmental decision support, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.08488, 2025.
a,
b,
c
Thieken, A. H., Kienzler, S., Kreibich, H., Kuhlicke, C., Kunz, M., Mühr, B., Müller, M., Otto, A., Petrow, T., Pisi, S., and Schröter, K.: Review of the flood risk management system in Germany after the major flood in 2013, Ecol. Soc., 21, 51,
https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08547-210251, 2016.
a,
b
Thomas, F. and Knüppe, K.: From Flood Protection to Flood Risk Management: Insights from the Rhine River in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, Water Resour. Manage., 30, 2785–2800,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1323-9, 2016.
a
USACE: Benefit determination involving existing levees. Policy Guide Letter 26, Memorandum for Major Subordinate Commands and District Commands., Tech. rep., U.S. Army Corps of Engineering,
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/24/Subject-_Policy_guidance_letter_no._26%2C_benefit_determination_involving_existing_levees_-_USACE-p16021coll9-1421.pdf (last access: 22 September 2026), 1991. a
Vitale, C.: Understanding the shift toward a risk-based approach in flood risk management, a comparative case study of three Italian rivers, Environ. Sci. Policy, 146, 13–23,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.04.015, 2023.
a
Vorogushyn, S.: Analysis of flood hazard under consideration of dike breaches, PhD thesis, Universität Potsdam,
https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/opus4-ubp/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/2595/file/vorogushyn_diss.pdf (last access: 22 September 2026), 2008.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h,
i,
j,
k
Vorogushyn, S., Merz, B., Lindenschmidt, K., and Apel, H.: A new methodology for flood hazard assessment considering dike breaches, Water Resour. Res., 46, 2009WR008475,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008475, 2010.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
