Articles | Volume 20, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2091-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2091-2020
Research article
 | 
06 Aug 2020
Research article |  | 06 Aug 2020

Evaluating the efficacy of bivariate extreme modelling approaches for multi-hazard scenarios

Aloïs Tilloy, Bruce D. Malamud, Hugo Winter, and Amélie Joly-Laugel

Viewed

Total article views: 3,097 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,093 906 98 3,097 335 81 78
  • HTML: 2,093
  • PDF: 906
  • XML: 98
  • Total: 3,097
  • Supplement: 335
  • BibTeX: 81
  • EndNote: 78
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Feb 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Feb 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,097 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,774 with geography defined and 323 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
Estimating risks induced by interacting natural hazards remains a challenge for practitioners. An approach to tackle this challenge is to use multivariate statistical models. Here we evaluate the efficacy of six models. The models are compared against synthetic data which are comparable to time series of environmental variables. We find which models are more appropriate to estimate relations between hazards in a range of cases. We highlight the benefits of this approach with two examples.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint