dear authors,

Thank you for revising your work according to the reviews.

After reading and evaluating the reviews given by the referees, and after my personal check on your last version's manuscript, I guess we are almost finished and that your paper may be considered acceptable provided that you are able to answer a few remaining doubts:

- line 163 - Please provide some basis for the choice of using SRTM (year of acquisition 2000) instead of ALOS DSM (year of acquisition 2007 and 2010). Is the area under investigation outside the ALOS DSM dataset coverage?

- line 260 - the sentence "... much debris led to slow velocities..." is not clear. Please rephrase

- lines 300-306 - Could you add some considerations on cases that do not fall on or near the regression line in Fig. 9? You use eq. to compute volumes but what about cases where the fit is not good?


I will personally review the corrections that you will make, without recurring to a new review round.
I am confident that this will greatly expedite the publication process.

Thank you for choosing NHESS Journal.

Looking forward to your response,
best regards
Filippo Catani

dear Authors

thank you for adding the last modifications to the manuscript that now is acceptable for publication.
You will shortly be contacted by the proof reading service for processing of the manuscript in the final form.

I think this would make an important contribution to our journal and I hope that you will publish with us again, in the future.

Thank you again,
My best wishes,
Filippo