Articles | Volume 18, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2697-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2697-2018
Research article
 | 
23 Oct 2018
Research article |  | 23 Oct 2018

Spatial consistency and bias in avalanche forecasts – a case study in the European Alps

Frank Techel, Christoph Mitterer, Elisabetta Ceaglio, Cécile Coléou, Samuel Morin, Francesca Rastelli, and Ross S. Purves

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by editor and referees) (22 Jul 2018) by Joaquim G. Pinto
AR by Frank Techel on behalf of the Authors (06 Sep 2018)  Manuscript 
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by editor and referees) (17 Sep 2018) by Joaquim G. Pinto
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (19 Sep 2018) by Joaquim G. Pinto
RR by Rune Engeset (24 Sep 2018)
RR by Karsten Müller (04 Oct 2018)
ED: Publish as is (05 Oct 2018) by Joaquim G. Pinto
AR by Frank Techel on behalf of the Authors (06 Oct 2018)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
In 1993, the European Avalanche Warning Services agreed upon a common danger scale to describe the regional avalanche hazard: the European Avalanche Danger Scale. Using published avalanche forecasts, we explored whether forecasters use the scale consistently. We noted differences in the use of the danger levels, some of which could be linked to the size of the regions a regional danger level is issued for. We recommend further harmonizing the avalanche forecast products in the Alps.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint