Dear Authors,
thank you for submitting your paper to this Special Issue. Your manuscript received two detailed reviews, somewhat similar. Both reviewers acknowledge a well-written and-structured paper which results in a good presentation quality of data and results.
However they both suggest major revisions for the manuscript.

Some comments on the input data and proposed method have arisen. In particular, the discussion on the scientific approach of the method needs to be strengthened. Concerning the input data, a description of the landslide database is also needed. In this regard, as also highlighted by both reviewers, could be useful to include a subsection describing the characteristics of the landslides present in the catalogue.

Please address each of the detailed comments and suggestions provided by the reviewers and utilize terminology that will be acceptable to experts in this field as well as to clarify some issues on the calibration process and the values obtained for some statistical indicators.

Based on the above considerations, I return the manuscript to you for major revision. When resubmitting your manuscript, please carefully address all issues mentioned in the reviewers' comments, and outline every change made point by point. Your revised version will receive a quick review process.

Best regards
Dr. Eng. Luca Piciullo

Dear Authors,
the new version of your manuscript satisfied me and the reviewer. All comments and suggestions made by the reviewers were accepted and the paper was improved.

Thus, the manuscript can be accepted for publication after two minor technical corrections:
1) Please correct "Tabela 3" at page 25.
2) Authors introduced a classification of the elevation in the legend of Figure 1. In order to avoid incongruities, I would suggest to separate the classes by using brackets, as done e.g. in Table 4.

Best regads
the Editor,
Luca Piciullo