23 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Engineering geology maps: landslides and geographical information systems J. Chacón et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-006-0064-z
2. Debris flow susceptibility assessment based on an empirical approach in the central region of South Korea S. Kang & S. Lee https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.01.025
3. Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using GIS-based Vector Grid File (VGF) Validating with InSAR Techniques: Three Gorges, Yangtze River (China) C. Kıncal et al. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2017.1.116
4. Hazard assessment and formation mechanism of debris flow outbursts in a small watershed of the Linxia Basin W. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.994593
5. Risk Assessment of Debris Flow in the Kashgar-to-Khunjerab Section of the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor J. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17192841
6. Regional bias of landslide data in generating susceptibility maps using logistic regression: Case of Hong Kong Island K. Chau & J. Chan https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-005-0024-x
7. Dynamic process-based risk assessment of debris flow on a local scale Q. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2016.1169477
8. Debris flow hazard assessment with numerical simulation K. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9285-8
9. Simulation and Management Impact Evaluation of Debris Flow in Dashiling Gully Based on FLO-2D Modeling X. Jia et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14104216
10. Physically-based modelling of granular flows with Open Source GIS M. Mergili et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-187-2012
11. Numerical Modelling of Debris Flows for Simulation-Based Decision Support: An Indian Perspective M. Abraham et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-024-00988-5
12. Susceptibility assessment of debris flow from Baoxing River basin in Lushan earthquake zone, China L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/861/5/052010
13. Assessment of potential outburst floods from the Tsho Rolpa glacial lake in Nepal B. Shrestha & H. Nakagawa https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0940-3
14. Debris flow hazard assessment by combining numerical simulation and land utilization J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1006-7
15. Refinement on non-hydrostatic shallow granular flow model in a global Cartesian coordinate system L. Yuan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-017-9672-x
16. Enhancing debris flow run-out hazard assessment through probabilistic post-event back analysis P. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-026-02746-5
17. Impact of Water-Induced Processes on the Development of Tarns and Their Basins in the High Tatras D. Tomko-Králo et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/eko-2017-0021
18. Regional risk assessment of debris flows in China—An HRU-based approach Q. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.04.027
19. Debris flow susceptibility assessment with a small sample based on SMOTE-RF coupling method: a case study in eastern Inner Mongolia Mountains M. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-026-02704-1
20. Establishing a GIS-based evaluation method considering spatial heterogeneity for debris flow susceptibility mapping at the regional scale S. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05487-5
21. Fast landslide events in calcareous debris and weathered pyroclastic soils: a case study in Southern Italy L. Massaro et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-026-04852-z
22. Comparing models of debris-flow susceptibility in the alpine environment A. Carrara et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.033
23. Simulation of debris flows in the Central Andes based on Open Source GIS: possibilities, limitations, and parameter sensitivity M. Mergili et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9965-7