Articles | Volume 26, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-863-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Beyond and beneath displacement time series: towards InSAR-based early warnings and deformation analysis of the Achoma landslide, Peru
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 23 Feb 2026)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 19 Jun 2025)
- Supplement to the preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1945', Anonymous Referee #1, 11 Sep 2025
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Benedetta Dini, 01 Dec 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1945', Maximillian Van Wyk de Vries, 13 Sep 2025
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Benedetta Dini, 01 Dec 2025
Peer review completion
AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (17 Dec 2025) by Olivier Dewitte
AR by Benedetta Dini on behalf of the Authors (23 Dec 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (02 Feb 2026) by Olivier Dewitte
AR by Benedetta Dini on behalf of the Authors (03 Feb 2026)
Manuscript
This paper describes the identification of precursory movements from the study of the wrapped phase of the interferograms. In particular, the authors suggest the use of coherence for the identification of gravitational structures that could be used to identify deformation processes and detect zones of weakness in extensive areas.
The paper is well structured and complete. The topic is very interesting, and covers a theme that is not yet fully exploited by the current InSAR applications state of the art..
The authors demonstrate a deep understanding of the processes involved in the case study, as well as in the technical aspects, i.e., remote sensing application. The methodology implemented is well described and the results are robust and validated. Thus, my opinion is the acceptance of the paper with just some following technicality revisions:
- Please adjust the reference to the figures as they are not correctly cited throughout the paper (e.g. line 333, 599)
- line 598. It is unclear what the authors aim to convey with the three inverse velocity plots. Is it that phase 4, which indeed led to failure, shows a different asymptoticity with respect to other accelerations? Please discuss this point further, as it is interesting.
- line 681: Please add a dot at the end of the sentence.