The manuscript was evaluated by two reviewers who acknowledged the novelty and potential impact of the proposed spatio-temporal wavelet framework for analysing precipitation extremes. Reviewer 1 highlighted that the methodology is robust and provides a valuable framework for understanding the organisation of extreme precipitation, but suggested improvements in clearly articulating the research gap, uncertainties related to radar and wavelet approaches, and the physical interpretation of some results. Reviewer 2 recognised the method as a reusable and potentially transformative approach for analysing precipitation fields, while recommending clearer presentation, particularly a better separation between theory and experimental application and clearer explanation of methodological choices. Both reviewers also provided several technical and structural suggestions aimed at improving clarity, transparency, and reproducibility. We invite author(s) to submit the revised manuscript.

Both reviewers agree that the manuscript suitable for publication. Reviewer 2 recommends acceptance without revision and considers the work a valuable contribution. Reviewer 1 also supports publication but requests a few minor revisions, mainly seeking clearer justification for the introduction and physical interpretation of the characteristic scale (S), along with several small textual and figure corrections. I recommend acceptance subject to minor revisions, with particular attention to strengthening the explanation of the proposed scale parameter and addressing all the specific suggesitions provided.

We thank the author for incorporating all the suggestions and answering to the concerns raised. Indeed, the readability and quality of the manuscript has increased significantly. Manuscript in the present form shall be accepted for publication.