This review paper aims to analyse how socio-economic conditions and climate change impact Inequality, Climate Resilience, and Sustainable Management of the urban parks in Berlin. The topic is pertinent and has growing importance in recent years.

The aim of the study is not clearly stated in lines 99-100. Sustainability is a very generic term, but in this paper, it seems that the focus is on the sustainable maintenance of urban green spaces and their contribution to "urban resilience to climate extremes" and not bout the adaptability of green spaces in Berlin to "climate change". This has to be clarified because the analyses of the bibliography are about resilience. 

The last paragraph of the introduction, lines 105-109, does not mention the description of the case study.

Chapter 5 does not show the Impacts on Berlin from climate change. Berlin has a moderate continental climate (Dfb), and it was the same moderate continental climate 100 years ago. Figure 5 shows an increasing trend in temperature, but this might be the effect of urbanisation because the population doubled in this period. As it is correctly written in lines 349-350 UHI would still exist in cities even without global warming, as it is inherently linked to the urban form and density. 

Chapter 5.4. Biodiversity Loss is about the huge effect of urbanisation and not about the light effect of temperature change in Berlin. 

In line 447, Air and Water Purification is about lower precipitation, but Figure 5 does not show a significant change. The ozone problem is due to UHI and transportation pollution and not because of climate change. 

The title of chapter 6 repeats twice Berlin’s Urban Park management.

Chapter 6 should discuss all urban green spaces (green infrastructure) and not only parks.

Chapter 6 is a well-documented discussion; however, the conclusion chapter is very extensive and should be shortened. The last two paragraphs can be deleted. 

The paper can be accepted after the above minor revision

This scientific review paper is very structured by focusing on multiple physical and social dynamics of parks in Berlin. Surprisingly, this review must outline the background of future research works on topics such as sustainable urban green spaces and the rehabilitation of green infrastructures. Hence, I strongly recommend that you accept and publish this paper. However, I have 3 particular comments, but it is completely up to the authors whether they want to include them or not -

(1) Surely, there are a few legal interventions to restore the parks in Berlin (i.e., the Public Parks Law in 1997), which can be incorporated in the manuscript.

(2) Maps and diagrams can be a little bit higher resolution

(3) Lastly, if possible, the abstract can be more concise