Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
NHESS
Articles | Volume 25, issue 6
Articles | Volume 25, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1789-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1789-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 25, issue 6
Research article
 | 
02 Jun 2025
Research article |  | 02 Jun 2025

Consistency between a strain rate model and the ESHM20 earthquake rate forecast in Europe: insights for seismic hazard

Bénédicte Donniol Jouve, Anne Socquet, Céline Beauval, Jesus Piña Valdès, and Laurentiu Danciu

Viewed

Total article views: 4,735 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,764 1,795 176 4,735 234 341
  • HTML: 2,764
  • PDF: 1,795
  • XML: 176
  • Total: 4,735
  • BibTeX: 234
  • EndNote: 341
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 May 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 May 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,735 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,675 with geography defined and 60 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 13 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
We investigate how geodetic monitoring enhances accuracy in seismic hazard assessment. By utilizing geodetic strain rate maps for Europe and the European Seismic Hazard Model 2020 source model, we compare geodetic and seismic moment rates across the continent while addressing associated uncertainties. Our analysis reveals primary compatibility in high-activity zones. In well-constrained regions of lower activity, we also observed an overlap in the distribution of seismic and geodetic moments.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint